Alternative Investment Funds, often abbreviated as AIFs, have become a buzzword among sophisticated investors, especially High Net Worth Individuals (HNIs).
As of February 2026, there are 1,768 registered AIFs in India1. This domain has witnessed remarkable growth, underscored by an almost 110% surge in commitments which escalated to Rs. 13.49 trillion in the fiscal year 2024-25 from Rs. 6.41 trillion in 2021-22.2. This growth translated to a substantial Rs. 7.07 trillion jump within three years. AIFs have shown superior IRRs (Internal Rate of Returns) compared to traditional Asset Management Companies (AMCs). This higher performance has led to a higher valuation premium for AIFs over traditional AMCs.
The total assets under management (AUM) of AIFs have grown at a CAGR (Compound Annual Growth Rate) of 28% between June FY19 and June FY24s3. 75% of AIFs have successfully generated positive alpha, compared to a lower alpha generation in equity AMCs, where 51% of large-cap funds and 26% of mid-cap funds were unable to deliver alpha over the past year4.
Equity AIFs have outperformed the BSE Sensex TRI index PME+ for five consecutive years. 80% of registered AIFs fall under Category I & II (venture capital, private equity, debt funds). ~₹4.4Tn invested, with ~70% allocated to unlisted securities. 44% of new schemes (2022–2024) were launched by first-time fund managers, highlighting strong market confidence.5.
The breakdown of the alternatives market is dominated by Private Equity (PE) and Real Assets, which are USD 250 billion and USD 125 billion, respectively. Private Credit, a growing segment, stands at USD 25 billion in the Indian market. AIFs are projected to represent 15% of the total AUM in India’s wealth management industry by 2027.
In light of the burgeoning AIF industry, its regulatory authority, the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI), hasn’t remained a silent observer. SEBI has proactively been fortifying protocols to guarantee investor safety, heighten transparency, and ensure fair practices within the AIF guidelines.
So, the question arises, what exactly are AIFs? And how do they function within the Indian regulatory landscape?
An Alternative Investment Fund (AIF) is a privately pooled and managed investment vehicle established in India structured as a trust, company, Limited Liability Partnership (LLP), or body corporate that gathers funds from sophisticated Indian or foreign investors for investment according to a defined investment policy for their benefit. These funds are explicitly regulated by the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) under the SEBI (Alternative Investment Funds) Regulations, 2012, and focus on non-traditional, less liquid assets such as private equity, venture capital, and real estate. Unlike mutual funds, AIFs are characterized by higher minimum investment requirements, longer lock-in periods, and a focus on specialized investment strategies.
AIFs are becoming a favoured choice for discerning investors, including High Net Worth Individuals (HNIs), Institutional Buyers and Family Offices. With their promise of high returns across diverse asset classes, AIFs are attractive for those aiming to diversify and enhance their portfolios. While these funds often involve complex strategies and higher risk, they provide unique opportunities for capital appreciation and exposure to non-traditional asset classes.
To better understand how AIFs differ from traditional investments, consider these core features:
In India, AIFs operate under the purview of the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI).
Since their establishment in the late 1980s, Venture Capital Funds (VCFs) have been a significant focus for the government to bolster the growth of specific sectors and early-stage companies. However, the desired outcomes in supporting emerging sectors and startups were not realized, largely due to regulatory uncertainties. Recognizing this challenge, in 2012, the Securities and Exchange Board of India unveiled the SEBI (Alternative Investment Funds) Regulations. This was done to categorize AIFs as a unique asset class, similar to Private Equities (PEs) and VCFs.
Any entity wishing to function as an AIF must seek registration with SEBI. While there are various legal structures under which an AIF can be established – such as a trust, a company, an LLP, or a body corporate – trusts are the most commonly chosen form in India.
A typical AIF structure looks like the following –
![Alternative Investment Funds(AIFs) in India : Framework, Types, Meaning [March 2026] AIF Structure in India, Structure of AIFs in India](https://cdn.treelife.in/2025/06/AIF-Structure-in-India.jpg)
The entities are:
It’s noteworthy that the roles of the Sponsor and Investment Manager can be unified, with one entity performing both functions.
Under the SEBI AIF Regulations, AIFs are classified into 3 distinct categories namely Category 1, Category 2 and Category 3 AIFs. Each category serves a unique purpose and is characterized by specific investment conditions and varying degrees of regulatory oversight. Below is an overview of the categories, highlighting their primary purpose and key conditions:
| Parameters | Category I AIF | Category II AIF | Category III AIF |
| Definitions | Funds with strategies to invest in start-up or early stage ventures or social ventures or SMEs or infrastructure or other sectors or areas which the government or regulators consider as socially or economically desirable. Includes: Venture Capital Funds (angel funds are a sub-category of VCFs)SME fundsSocial Impact FundsInfrastructure FundsSpecial Situation Funds | Funds that cannot be categorized as Category I AIFs or Category III AIFs. These funds do not undertake leverage or borrowing other than to meet day-to-day operational requirements and as permitted in the AIF Regulations. Examples – Private Equity or Debt Funds | Funds which employ diverse or complex trading strategies and may employ leverage including through investment in listed or unlisted derivatives. Examples – Hedge funds or funds which trade with a view to make short-term returns |
| AIF Minimum ticket size | INR 1 crore | INR 1 crore | INR 1 crore |
| AIF Minimum fund size | INR 20 crore | INR 20 crore | INR 20 crore |
| Open or close ended AIF | Close-ended fund | Close-ended fund | Can be open or close-ended fund |
| Tenure | Minimum tenure of 3 years | Minimum tenure of 3 years | NA |
| Continuing interest of Sponsor / Manager (a.k.a skin in the game) | Lower of:2.5 % of corpusINR 5 crores | Lower of:2.5 % of corpusINR 5 crores | Lower of:5 % of corpusINR 10 crore |
| Investment outside India | Permissible subject to SEBI approval | Permissible subject to SEBI approval | Permissible subject to SEBI approval |
| Concentration norms | Cant invest more than 25% in 1 investee company | Cant invest more than 25% in 1 investee company | Cant invest more than 10% in 1 investee company |
| Borrowing | To not borrow funds except for : (a) temporary funds not more than 30 days (b) less than 4 occasions in a year Borrowing shall be limited to the lower of:i) 10% of investable fundsii) 20% of the proposed investment in the investee companyiii) undrawn commitment from investors other than the defaulting investors | (Same as Category 1 AIF) | Can engage in leverage & borrowing as per prescribed rules |
| Overall restrictions / compliances | Low | Medium | High |
| SEBI registration fees | INR 500,000 | INR 1,000,000 | INR 1,500,000 |
| Per scheme filing fees | INR 100,000 | INR 100,000 | INR 100,000 |
Table 1: Categories of AIFs
Apart from the categories mentioned above, any of the three categories of AIFs can be classified as a large-value fund (LVFs), provided that each investor is an “accredited investor” as per the AIF Regulations and invests a minimum of INR 70 crores in the AIF. LVFs have certain investment and compliance related exemptions.
Category I Alternative Investment Funds (AIFs) are investment vehicles designed to promote economic development, entrepreneurship, innovation, and social impact. These funds channel capital into sectors that are considered socially or economically desirable by regulators and the government, and therefore often receive policy support, incentives, or concessions.
Regulated by Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI), Category I AIFs primarily focus on long-term value creation rather than short-term liquidity.
Category I AIFs invest in areas that contribute directly to nation-building and economic expansion, including:
These investments are typically unlisted, early-stage, or financially complex, which increases both risk and return potential.
This structure aligns investor capital with long-term developmental outcomes.
Key Risk Characteristics:
Category I AIFs enjoy pass-through tax status:
To ensure alignment of interest between fund managers and investors:
Venture Capital Funds invest in early-stage and high-growth unlisted companies with scalable business models. These funds play a vital role in:
VCFs carry higher risk, but also the potential for outsized returns.
Angel Funds are a specialized sub-category of Venture Capital Funds focused on seed-stage and early-stage startups.
Key Characteristics:
Angel Funds act as the first institutional capital for many startups. Angel Funds also hold a distinct categorization under the AIF Regulations. These funds are a sub-category of Category I AIFs – VCFs, primarily designed to acknowledge and support the unique role of angel investors in the startup ecosystem. The key characteristics of Angel funds are summarised below:
| Parameters | Category 1 AIFs |
| Conditions | Minimum corpus – None Minimum number of investors – 5 Accredited Investors to declare first closeMaximum investors per scheme – No limit |
| Continuing interest of Sponsor / Manager(a.k.a skin in the game) | Minimum continuing interest to be maintained in each investment of the Angel Fund at higher of:0.5% of investment amount or INR 50,000 |
| Angel Investor | An Accredited Investor or KMP of an angel fund / manager |
| Accredited Investor (AIs) | “accredited investor” means any person who is granted a certificate of accreditation by an accreditation agency and who:Individuals, HUFs, Family trusts and sole proprietorship meeting any of the following criteria:Annual income >= INR 2 crore; or Net-worth >= INR 7.5 crore (with >= INR 3.75 crore in financial assets); orAnnual income >= INR 1 crore and net-worth >= INR 5 crore (with >= INR 2.5 crore in financial assets)Partnership firms: Eligible only if each partner meets the above criteriaTrusts (excluding family trusts) and Body-corporates: Net-worth >= INR 50 crores |
| Investments | Can invest directly in startups (without launching separate schemes)Minimum investment: Rs. 10 lakhs Maximum investment: Rs. 25 croresLock-in: 1 year (Reduced to 6 months if its a third party sale)Can invest 25% of the Fund corpus outside India subject to SEBI approvalCan invest entirely into one startup (with minimum 2 Accredited Investors) |
| Open or close ended fund | Close-ended |
| Investor Approval | Manager to obtain prior approval from each angel investor before making investment |
| SEBI registration fees | INR 200,000 |
Table 2: Angel Funds
Special Situation Funds invest in financially distressed assets, including:
Additional Conditions:
These funds aim to unlock value from distressed but viable businesses.
Social Venture Funds pursue a dual mandate:
They invest in organizations addressing challenges such as:
These funds demonstrate that profitability and social good can coexist.
Category II Alternative Investment Funds (AIFs) represent the most widely used AIF category and include all funds that do not fall under Category I or Category III. These funds are designed to provide investors with structured exposure to private markets while operating under defined regulatory constraints. Category II AIFs are funds that neither qualify for incentives under Category I nor engage in leverage or complex trading strategies like Category III. They are not permitted to use leverage for investment purposes, except for temporary borrowing strictly to meet day-to-day operational requirements. These funds typically invest in unlisted entities, real estate, or distressed assets and are structured as close-ended vehicles with a defined tenure.
Category II AIFs primarily invest in:
This investment approach offers diversification through unlisted private markets and is generally associated with moderate-to-high risk and stable long-term return potential.
The close-ended nature aligns with the long-term investment horizon required for private market value creation.
Leverage and Borrowing:
This restriction ensures lower systemic risk and preserves the long-term investment focus of the fund.
The pass-through mechanism ensures that income is taxed directly in the hands of investors rather than at the fund level.
This requirement ensures sponsor alignment with investor interests.
Custodianship provides an additional layer of asset safety and oversight for large funds.
Private Equity Funds form a major component of Category II AIFs. These funds invest in mature, unlisted companies with the objective of growth, expansion, acquisitions, or restructuring. Investments are typically made by acquiring controlling or significant minority stakes. Fund managers actively engage with portfolio company management to enhance operational efficiency and value creation.
Debt Funds under Category II focus on investing in debt instruments issued by unlisted companies. These may include structured debt, mezzanine financing, or convertible debt. Such funds provide alternative financing solutions for companies that may not rely solely on traditional bank funding.
Fund of Funds under the AIF framework invest in other AIFs instead of directly investing in companies or assets. This structure enables diversification across multiple strategies and fund managers through a single investment.
Category III AIFs are designed to capitalize on short-term and medium-term market opportunities through active trading strategies. Unlike Category I and II AIFs, these funds are permitted to use leverage and sophisticated financial instruments. Their goal is not merely to outperform a benchmark but to achieve positive returns in both rising and falling markets.
Category III AIFs primarily invest in:
These funds actively trade across asset classes and market segments to exploit inefficiencies and price movements.
Category III AIFs employ diverse and complex trading strategies, including but not limited to:
They frequently use leverage (borrowed capital to amplify returns) and derivatives such as futures, options, and swaps for both hedging and speculative purposes. Due to these characteristics, Category III AIFs exhibit high volatility and complex valuation methodologies, making them suitable only for sophisticated investors with higher risk tolerance.
This flexibility allows fund managers to dynamically adjust portfolios based on market conditions.
The ability to employ leverage differentiates Category III AIFs from other AIF categories.
This higher sponsor contribution reflects the elevated risk and complexity of Category III AIFs.
Custodianship ensures enhanced transparency, asset safety, and regulatory oversight.
Hedge Funds are the most prominent segment of Category III AIFs. They operate with flexible investment mandates and typically charge higher fees due to their active management style and use of advanced financial instruments. Their primary objective is to generate alpha, or market-beating returns, irrespective of overall market direction.
The key investment team of the Investment Manager of all AIFs have to comply with certain qualification conditions which are specified below:
| Experience | Minimum 1 key person to obtain certification from the NISM by passing the NISM Series-XIX-C: Alternative Investment Fund Managers Certification Examination or NISM Series-XIX-D: AIF Cat I and II examination or NISM Series-XIX-E: AIF Cat III examination |
| Educational Qualification | Minimum 1 key person with professional qualification in any of the below from a university or an institution recognized by Central Government or any State Government or a foreign university – Finance Accountancy Business management Commerce Economics Capital markets or Banking CFA charter from the CFA institute |
Table 3: Criteria for Key Investment Team
The experience and education qualification criteria may be satisfied by the same person.
The taxation of Alternative Investment Funds (AIFs) in India depends on whether the fund enjoys pass-through status or is taxed at the fund level:
Category I and II AIFs are granted pass-through status from an income-tax perspective, whereby any income earned by these AIFs (other than profits or gains from business) is not taxed at the AIF level, but directly taxed as income at the hands of the investors as if these investors had directly received this income from the investments.
Unabsorbed losses (other than business losses) of the AIF may be allocated to the investors for them to set off against their respective individual incomes, subject to such investors having held the units in the AIF for at least 12 months.
Further, the distributions from Category I and II AIFs are subject to a withholding tax of 10% in the case of resident investors, and at the rates in force in the case of non-resident investors (after giving due consideration to any benefit available to them under the applicable tax treaty).
The Finance Act, 2025 has introduced a clarificatory amendment to the definition of ‘capital asset’ by expressly including investments made by Category I and II AIFs. This amendment resolves the long-standing ambiguity regarding the characterization of income clarifying that gains from investments made by Category I and II AIF shall be taxable under the head ‘Capital Gains’.
Category III AIFs have not been granted statutory pass-through status. Typically, they are set up as “determinate and irrevocable trusts.” This means the trusts have identifiable beneficiaries, and their respective beneficial interests can be determined at any given time. In such trusts, the trustee can discharge the tax obligation for the income of the trust on behalf of its beneficiaries (i.e., the investors) in a representative capacity. This is similar to the tax liability an investor would face if they had received the income directly. However, there’s an exception: trusts with any business income must pay tax at the MMR i.e., 39% where the trust pays tax under the new regime. As per income-tax law, tax authorities can recover tax either from the trustee or directly from the beneficiaries. Given this flexibility, a trustee might opt to pay the entire tax amount at the AIF level. Moreover, the law permits the trustee (acting as a representative assessee) to recover from investors any taxes it has paid on their behalf.
We have not covered tax implications for investment managers and sponsor entities above.
Private Placement Memorandum (PPM):
The PPM provides comprehensive details about the AIF. Contents include information about the manager, key investment team, targeted investors, proposed fees and expenses, scheme tenure, redemption conditions or limits, investment strategy, risk factors and management, conflict of interest procedures, disciplinary history, service terms and conditions by the manager, affiliations with intermediaries, winding up procedures, and any other relevant details helping investors make informed decisions about investing in an AIF scheme.
SEBI has introduced mandatory templates for PPMs (for and) which provides for two parts:
There are two templates – one for Category I and II AIFs and the other for Category III AIFs.
Angel Funds, LVFs and AIFs in which each investor commits to a minimum capital contribution of INR 70 crores are exempted from following the aforementioned template.
Indenture of Trust / Trust Deed:
This document is an agreement between the settlor and the trustee. It involves the settlor transferring an initial settlement (can be nominal) to the trustee to create the fund’s assets. The Indenture details the roles and responsibilities of the trustee.
Investment Management Agreement:
This agreement is entered between the trustee and the investment manager. Here, the trustee designates the investment manager and transfers most of its management powers regarding the fund to them. However, certain powers retained by the trustee are outlined in the Indenture of Trust.
Contribution Agreement:
This agreement is between the contributor (investor), the trustee, and the investment manager. It mentions the terms of an investor’s participation in the fund, covering areas like beneficial interest computation, distribution mechanism, expense list to be borne by the fund, and the investment committee’s powers. SEBI mandates that the Contribution Agreement’s terms should align with the PPM and shouldn’t exceed its provisions.
Understanding the tenure and liquidity aspects of AIFs is crucial for investors, as it dictates the duration of their capital commitment and the ease with which they can exit an investment.
The tenure of an Alternative Investment Fund, or its individual schemes, varies based on its category:
While AIFs are primarily private investment vehicles, SEBI regulations permit the optional listing of AIF units on recognized stock exchanges. This provision aims to offer a potential avenue for liquidity to investors.
To register an AIF with SEBI, the fund needs to make an application to SEBI on its online portal.
The trust deed i.e. incorporation document of the fund where it is set up as a trust, needs to be registered with the local authorities. Further, the PAN needs to be obtained before making the application to SEBI.
The application to SEBI has the following key documents to be submitted:
Further, before submitting the application to SEBI, the AIF must engage a merchant banker who performs due diligence on the PPM and subsequently provides a certification that needs to be filed with SEBI. However, there’s an exemption for LVFs and Angel Funds for this requirement.
Once the application is submitted, SEBI will evaluate the application. Generally, the entire AIF setup and registration process, including SEBI’s assessment, spans around four to six months.
Broadly, the process flow looks as follows:
![Alternative Investment Funds(AIFs) in India : Framework, Types, Meaning [March 2026] AIF SEBI Process Flow](https://cdn.treelife.in/2025/06/AIF-SEBI-Process-Flow.jpg)
AIF Process Flow
Alternative Investment Funds (AIFs) are designed for high-net-worth individuals (HNWI), institutional investors, and sophisticated investors. These investors typically include:
For a broader audience of investors looking to diversify their portfolios, it is important to understand that AIFs generally require a minimum investment of ₹1 crore (approximately $135,000), a barrier to entry for retail investors. Moreover, certain funds like Category III AIFs, which invest in more volatile assets like hedge funds, require highly experienced investors to take calculated risks.
Investing in Alternative Investment Funds (AIFs) requires careful consideration due to their unique nature. Before investing, assess these critical factors:
Taxation plays a significant role in the decision-making process for potential investors in AIFs. Understanding the structure of taxation on both the fund and the investor level is crucial:
AIFs offer several attractive benefits for high-net-worth individuals and institutional investors looking to diversify their portfolios. The key benefits include:
With their ability to diversify investment portfolios and provide potential high returns, AIFs undeniably present an attractive avenue for investment in today’s dynamic market scenario.The regulatory framework, set by SEBI, ensures transparency, credibility, and alignment with global best practices, further instilling confidence among stakeholders. However, AIFs can be tricky to understand because of the different types, how they are taxed, and the many documents involved. It’s like trying to put together a puzzle with lots of pieces.
India’s AIF industry continues its strong upward trajectory, driven by rising domestic capital, technology adoption, and regulatory maturity. As of September 2025, total AIF commitments crossed ₹15 lakh crore (USD ~180 billion), reflecting robust year-on-year growth of around 18–20%. Fund managers are increasingly leveraging advanced analytics, AI-led risk monitoring, and automated compliance systems, with adoption expanding steadily through 2025. Private credit has solidified its position as a core strategy, contributing roughly 15% of total AIF commitments, supported by tighter bank lending and demand for structured yield products. The investor mix is now firmly dominated by HNWIs and family offices, which account for nearly 80–90% of total inflows; HNI investments alone reached approximately ₹5.38 lakh crore by March 2025, growing over 30% year-on-year. On the regulatory front, SEBI continues to strengthen disclosure, valuation, and governance norms while simplifying accreditation frameworks, reinforcing AIFs as a cornerstone of sophisticated portfolio construction in India.
For both potential AIF managers and investors, understanding this intricate ecosystem is crucial. It is recommended to talk to experts who know the details. They can guide you through the process, help you understand the rules, and make sure you’re making the best decisions. As the world of AIFs keeps changing, staying informed and getting the right advice will be key to success.
At Treelife, we specialize in helping investors and fund managers navigate the complexities of the AIF landscape. Whether it’s SEBI registration, fund structuring, or regulatory compliance, our team of experts is here to guide you through every step of the process.
Reach out to us today and ensure your AIF investment strategies are aligned with the latest regulations and market trends.
Contact Us: support@treelife.in
Call Us: +91 99301 56000
References:
︎
︎
︎
︎
︎The landscape for Indian startups has fundamentally shifted. A growing number of founders are making a deliberate choice to re-domicile their businesses from offshore jurisdictions like Delaware, Singapore, or Mauritius back to India. This strategic move, known as a “reverse flip” or re-domiciliation, is no longer niche its becoming mainstream.
But what’s driving this trend? And more importantly, is it right for your company?
At its core, a reverse flip is a straightforward concept: migrating your offshore holding company structure so that an Indian entity becomes the consolidated parent of your group. What sounds simple in theory, however, involves navigating complex legal, tax, regulatory, and operational dimensions.
For many founders, this process unlocks significant strategic advantages that were previously unavailable to them.
SEBI doesn’t negotiate on this point: if you want to list on the NSE, BSE, or GIFT City exchanges, your listing entity must be Indian-incorporated. For any founder with IPO ambitions within the next three to five years, a reverse flip isn’t optional it’s essential.
The domestic investment landscape has matured dramatically. Large family offices, alternative investment funds (AIFs), and strategic investors now deploy substantial capital into Indian startups. Many of these investors have FEMA-linked mandates that restrict or prohibit direct investment into foreign entities. By flipping to India, you’re removing a structural barrier to accessing this growing pool of capital.
One of the most underestimated tax risks for Indian-operated companies with foreign holding structures is POEM (Place of Effective Management) exposure. If your entire management team, operations, and decision-making centers are in India, the Indian tax authority can argue that your offshore entity itself is an Indian tax resident potentially subjecting it to Indian taxation on global income at rates exceeding 40%. A reverse flip eliminates this uncertainty permanently.
PLI scheme eligibility. DPIIT startup benefits including the 80-IAC three-year profit deduction. Government procurement preferences. These aren’t marginal advantages; they can materially impact your unit economics and growth trajectory. Offshore-incorporated entities are excluded from all of them.
Maintaining dual-entity structures across two jurisdictions requires parallel audits, transfer pricing studies, FEMA compliance filings, and coordinated governance. The annual cost of this dual-jurisdiction burden typically ranges from ₹30 to 60 lakhs per year. A single-jurisdiction Indian structure reduces this to ₹10 to 25 lakhs annual savings that recover the entire cost of the flip within two to three years.
Not every company should flip immediately. A few critical questions should guide your decision:
Is 90 percent or more of your revenue, operations, or customer base already in India? If yes, you’re a strong candidate. If your business is genuinely global or primarily offshore-focused, the economics shift.
Are you planning an India IPO in the next three to five years? This is a binary yes-or-no question with clear implications.
Do you hold material intellectual property, contracts, or international business operations offshore? Complexity here doesn’t kill the flip, but it does require careful planning. You may want to consider IP migration or partial flip strategies first.
Do key investors have FEMA restrictions or RBI approval requirements? This is often the longest-lead-time item in a flip. Mapping it early is critical.
Is your ESOP pool primarily held by Indian resident employees? Post-flip ESOP plans are cleaner for Indian residents. Foreign ESOP holders require additional FEMA structuring.
The tax code and corporate law provide three distinct pathways to execute a reverse flip, each with different timelines, costs, and implications.
This is the legally cleanest route. Your offshore entity merges into your Indian subsidiary through a National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) scheme, and the merged entity survives as your new Indian holding company.
The timeline is the longest, typically nine to eighteen months because NCLT approval is required. But the benefits are substantial: Section 47 tax neutrality is often available, the offshore entity is fully eliminated, and the structure is IPO-ready from day one.
This route is ideal if you have a clean cap table and aligned investors. It’s the preferred path for companies seriously tracking toward an IPO.
Here, offshore shareholders exchange their shares for shares in a new Indian holding company. The offshore entity may be retained as a subsidiary or wound down over time.
The legal basis is found in FEMA regulations and the Income Tax Act. Section 47(viab) can provide tax neutrality if structuring conditions are met, though arm’s-length valuation is required.
The timeline is considerably faster four to nine months because NCLT isn’t involved. This makes it attractive for companies with tight funding timelines or complex cap tables where NCLT consensus is harder to achieve.
The fastest route, typically three to six months. The offshore entity is liquidated, its assets and IP are distributed to the Indian company, and the offshore entity is wound up.
This works best for early-stage companies with simple structures, few active investors, and limited offshore assets. The tradeoff: potential capital gains tax on asset transfers, and valuation of IP becomes critical. It’s the most tax-exposed route but operationally the simplest.
A reverse flip triggers multiple tax checkpoints. Understanding them upfront prevents surprises.
Capital gains on the share swap or merger: Depending on the route chosen and how it’s structured, this could be entirely tax-neutral (Section 47 treatment) or trigger capital gains tax. Proper structuring and advance tax opinions are essential.
ESOP perquisite tax for employees: ESOPs held by employees are subject to perquisite tax upon exercise, typically at slab rates up to 30%. However, employees of registered DPIIT startups can defer this tax to the earlier of five years from exercise, exit, or sale of securities. This is a powerful but often-overlooked benefit.
Indirect transfer tax exposure: Non-resident shareholders may face Indian indirect transfer tax under Section 9 if the flip results in a change of control over an Indian asset. DTAA (Bilateral Tax Treaty) protections may apply, but this requires early assessment.
IP transfer and royalty implications: If intellectual property is migrating from offshore to India, transfer pricing arm’s-length valuation is mandatory, and withholding tax may apply.
POEM-based taxation: This is perhaps the single biggest tax risk in the pre-flip state. If your offshore holding company has established a place of effective management in India which it likely has if all operations and management are Indianit’s already a taxable resident of India. A flip eliminates this exposure.
A reverse flip is not a three-week process. Depending on the route, expect a total timeline of three to eighteen months from start to finish.
The process breaks into six overlapping phases:
Phase One: Diagnostic and Structuring (4-8 weeks) – Cap table audit, POEM risk assessment, tax exposure mapping, and route selection.
Phase Two: Board and Investor Approvals (6-10 weeks) – Board resolutions, investor consent letters, SHA review, and waiver of rights from minority shareholders.
Phase Three: Regulatory Filings (8-16 weeks) – NCLT petitions (if merger), RBI and FEMA filings, MCA filings, and tax authority notifications.
Phase Four: Execution and Asset Migration (4-8 weeks) – Share issuance and cancellation, contract novation, IP transfer, and banking restructuring.
Phase Five: ESOP Restructuring (4-6 weeks) – New Indian ESOP plan adoption, employee communications, and option conversion or buyout mechanics.
Phase Six: Post-Flip Compliance (4-8 weeks) – DPIIT registration (do this within the first 30 days), updated statutory registers, first-year audit, and offshore entity wind-down.
Professional fees for a complete reverse flip typically range from ₹25 to 95 lakhs, depending on complexity.
Legal fees (NCLT and documentation) run ₹15 to 60 lakhs. This varies significantly based on cap table complexity and whether NCLT is required.
Tax advisory and transfer pricing studies cost ₹8 to 25 lakhs. This scales with the value of IP being transferred and the number of tax jurisdictions involved.
Regulatory and FEMA filings add ₹3 to 10 lakhs, driven primarily by the number of offshore investors and jurisdictions.
These are significant costs, but remember: dual-jurisdiction compliance costs typically recover this entire investment within two to three years.
A reverse flip introduces several material risks that require proactive mitigation.
NCLT and regulatory timeline overruns are the highest-probability risk. Build a four-month buffer into your planning. Maintain bridge financing capacity. Communicate transparently with investors about timeline variability.
Investor consent bottlenecks can be the critical path item. Map all consent rights and investor veto provisions at the start. Engage your top investors at least 90 days before your target flip date. Provide them with a clear, written information memorandum outlining the rationale, tax implications, and timeline.
Unexpected tax liabilities can emerge from careful examination of capital gains treatment or Section 56(2)(x) gift tax on asset transfers. Commission a comprehensive tax opinion from a Big Four firm or specialist early. If stakes are high, consider requesting an advance ruling from the tax authority.
ESOP valuation disputes can create employee dissatisfaction. Engage a registered valuer for the conversion. Conduct transparent employee Q&A sessions. Provide written FAQs. Consider offering independent employee counsel during the process.
Contract continuity risks with customers and vendors require proactive legal review of change-of-control clauses and novation mechanics. Provide customers and vendors with 90 days notice and clear communication about the structural change.
The biggest operational risk in a reverse flip is often not legal or tax, its investor alignment.
Begin investor outreach at least 90 days before your target flip date. Surprises generate resistance. Early engagement builds consensus.
Provide investors with a written information memorandum that covers the strategic rationale for the flip, the specific legal route you’ve chosen, the detailed tax analysis for their specific share class (different shareholders have different tax exposures), and the expected timeline with buffers.
Address FEMA and repatriation concerns head-on. Many offshore investors worry about their ability to get money out of India post-flip. Provide them with a clear FEMA compliance roadmap and RBI approval timeline upfront. This preempts the biggest objection before it hardens.
Segment your investor base. Angels, VCs, strategic investors, and ESOP holders all have different concerns and information needs. Tailor your communication accordingly rather than sending a single all-hands memo.
Identify potential dissenters early and engage directly. If your structure requires NCLT approval, understand the fair exit mechanisms available to minority shareholders who object.
Document everything. Board resolutions, consents, waivers, shareholder communication keep detailed records. This documentation is critical for RBI filings, NCLT proceedings, and future due diligence.
When a reverse flip is executed well, the benefits compound quickly.
You gain immediate eligibility for government schemes like PLI and DPIIT startup registration. The 80-IAC three-year profit deduction can be worth multiples of the flip’s cost.
You unlock access to domestic institutional capital that was previously unavailable or reluctant to invest. This often results in higher valuation multiples from Indian AIFs compared to foreign-focused structures.
You eliminate POEM tax risk permanently, providing both certainty and long-term tax efficiency.
You simplify operations, reduce annual compliance costs, and accelerate your readiness for IPO-track activities like financial restatement and governance upgrades.
Most importantly, you position your company as an Indian-owned and Indian-headquartered signal that increasingly matters to customers, regulators, and capital providers.
A reverse flip is not right for every company. But for founders with substantial Indian operations, strong domestic market positioning, and medium-term growth ambitions, it’s increasingly a strategic necessity rather than an optional step.
The window to execute a flip is often narrow. Timing matters you want to flip before you become too large or too complex, but after you’ve achieved enough scale that the cost is justified.
If you’re considering a reverse flip, the time to assess feasibility is now. The longer you wait, the more complex your cap table becomes, the more difficult investor alignment grows, and the larger your tax exposure potentially becomes.
The best flips happen quietly, well-planned and well-executed, with full investor buy-in and clear strategic purpose. That takes time to set up correctly.
]]>Union Budget 2026–27 signals a decisive strategic pivot: India is moving from being a consumer and services executor of global digital technologies to becoming a producer, owner, and exporter of AI-driven digital infrastructure.
Three structural themes dominate the budget’s technology agenda:
India currently generates ~20% of the world’s data, yet ~95% of Indian-origin data is processed or stored overseas creating security, competitiveness, latency, and economic leakage risks.
Budget 2026–27 directly targets this mismatch through tax architecture, compliance simplification, and infrastructure constraints (power, water, materials) that govern real-world feasibility.
Budget 2026–27 builds on a digital economy that already has scale but is constrained by physical and regulatory dependencies.
As of Q3 2025, India’s data centre capacity reached 1.5 GW, distributed primarily across seven urban clusters: Mumbai, Chennai, Hyderabad, NCR, Bengaluru, Pune, GIFT City and Noida.
Interpretation:
The attached Report provides a concise sector table with market sizes, projections, and growth drivers.
Table 1: India Technology Segment Outlook
| Sector | 2025 Market Size (Estimated) | 2030–2033 Projection | Anticipated CAGR | Primary Growth Driver |
| Artificial Intelligence | $13.05B | $325.3B (by 2033) | 38.1%–39% | Social AI, Enterprise GenAI, GPU clusters |
| Cybersecurity Products | $4.46B | $6.0B (by 2026) | 25% annual | DPDP Act, AI-powered threat defense |
| Data Center Services | $3.88B | $21.03B (by 2031) | 13.59%–15.3% | Data localisation, 5G, hyperscale cloud |
| IT Spending (Total) | $159B | $176.3B (by 2026) | 10.6% | Software + data centre systems |
| SaaS Market | $15.5B | $50.0B (by 2030) | High (Trend) | AI integration, global SMB demand |
Implications for strategy:
India is cited as having the second-highest AI talent base globally, with 420,000+ employees in AI-specific job functions, expected to grow at ~15% CAGR till 2027, with demand rising to ~1.25 million professionals.
What this signals for businesses:
Founder lens (practical):
Budget 2026–27 reframes data centres from support facilities into the foundational layer for digital architecture across sectors.
The report explicitly positions technology infrastructure data centres, cloud platforms, cybersecurity, and digital public infrastructure on the same footing as roads, power, and logistics.
This implies:
The documents highlight a structural mismatch:
Why it matters beyond compliance:
Capacity snapshot:
The Report references a policy-driven expectation of capacity expansion citing a shift from ~1 GW baseline in the projection logic toward ~10 GW potential under investment attraction expectations.

The budget’s headline move is a 21-year tax holiday until March 31, 2047 for foreign companies providing global cloud services via India-based data centres.
The Report adds structure to eligibility, including:
Table 2: 2047 Tax Holiday Qualification Checklist
| Requirement | What it means for operators | Why it exists |
| Specified DCs notified under MeitY scheme | Use approved/nominated DCs | Ensures compliance and strategic alignment |
| Indian-owned and operated DC | Physical asset anchored in India | Builds domestic infrastructure capability |
| Local Indian reseller for Indian customers | Domestic tax base preserved (25.7%) | Balances investment attraction + revenue |
| Foreign provider asset-light | Cloud provider avoids owning DC assets | Encourages rapid entry + local partnership |
Reports state an expectation to attract >$70 billion in cumulative investments over 5–7 years, potentially expanding capacity toward ~10 GW (from the baseline cited in the projection logic).
Investor interpretation:
Budget 2026–27 introduces a 15% cost-based safe harbour margin for Indian data centre entities providing services to related foreign companies.
Key impact:
Table 3: Safe Harbour Reform Summary
| Element | Budget 2026–27 Change | Who benefits most |
| DC related-party services | 15% cost-based safe harbour | DC operators, foreign affiliates, infra investors |
| IT services safe harbour | Single category + 15.5% | Mid/large IT + GCC service providers |
| Threshold expansion | ₹300cr → ₹2,000cr | Scaled firms previously outside safe harbour |
| Process | Automated approvals + faster APAs | CFOs and tax teams; improves predictability |
AWS, Azure, and Google Cloud control ~63% of global cloud infrastructure.
Combined announced investments in India exceeding $30 billion over 14 years.
Post-budget India becomes viable for:
Strategic shift: India moves from “regional node” to “global compute base.”
A large share of startup unit economics especially in AI-native businesses depends on compute price stability, predictable data localisation, and scalable infrastructure access.
Budget-induced implications:
The structural opportunity is not only in DC real estate, but in:
Budget 2026–27 reframes AI as a general-purpose governance and productivity engine a “utility layer,” not a lab experiment.
Bharat-VISTAAR is presented as a multilingual AI integrating AgriStack with ICAR data for farmer advisories.
Why this is strategically meaningful:
The AI-driven use-cases including:

AI market scaling cited in the sector outlook table $13.05B (2025) to $325.3B (by 2033) with ~38–39% CAGR implies enormous compute scaling, tightening the coupling between AI growth and data centre buildout, power availability, and cooling innovation.
Budget 2026–27 embeds cybersecurity into digital governance, shifting from compliance checklists to continuous, decision-grade visibility and accountability.
Growth projected as below:
Table 4: Cybersecurity Shift Governance Implications
| Dimension | Legacy posture | Budget-era posture |
| Visibility | Periodic assessment | Continuous risk visibility |
| Objective | Compliance | Exposure reduction + accountability |
| Stakeholder | IT/security team | Board + business leadership |
| Driver | Audit cycles | DPDP enforcement + AI threat evolution |
The budget recognizes that compute sovereignty cannot be achieved through tax provisions alone; it must be executed through the physical layer.
Key measures described include:
Investor implication:
The investable universe expands from DC shells into integrated energy + compute platforms: PPAs, grid storage, modular edge units, and cooling innovation.

Table 5: Materials and Real Estate Demand Linked to DC Expansion
| Material/Resource | Projected Demand/Impact | Strategic relevance |
| Copper | 330,000–420,000 tonnes annually by 2030 | Supply constraint; 5x–6x higher than standard buildings |
| Fiber optic cable | 36x higher demand for AI clusters | Transceivers + optical networking boom |
| Real estate | 50–55 million sq ft by 2030 | Shift toward tier-1 peripheries + dedicated tech parks |
| Power consumption | ~3% of national grid by 2030 | Renewable PPAs + industrial grid storage opportunity |
Budget 2026–27 strengthens the thesis that AI sovereignty is not only about models; it is about compute, storage, and hardware control.
ISM 2.0 is positioned as moving beyond assembly toward:
The Electronic Component Scheme outlay is cited as increased to ₹40,000 crore.
Investor lens:
The opportunity is not limited to fabs; it includes equipment, materials, and supply chain resilience layers that reduce exposure to global disruptions.
Budget 2026–27 includes reforms that encourage India’s IT sector and GCC ecosystem to evolve from execution to ownership design, build, run, and govern mission-critical platforms globally.
The data states:
GCCs increasingly become:
Business takeaway:
For multinationals, India’s positioning becomes less “cost centre” and more “operational command centre,” supported by regulatory simplification and tax predictability.
Budget 2026–27 introduces targeted measures to attract global expertise and remove friction for returning Indians and non-resident professionals.
Non-resident professionals relocating to India under government-notified schemes receive:
The Report describes:
This is positioned as a mechanism to clean up legacy compliance issues tied to foreign bank accounts, RSUs, ETFs, and other overseas holdings.
Budget 2026–27 signals a deliberate shift toward manufacturing-led entrepreneurship and scalable, compliance-forward MSMEs.
The Report references:
This fund is presented as a move from credit-heavy interventions to equity and structured support:
The Report lists three primary entry routes:
The report notes:
This functions as a financial cushion during formative years, but it is most valuable when paired with improved compute access, governance readiness, and scalable infrastructure.
India’s development costs for data centres are stated as:
The report provides comparative indicators, including:
Table 6: Regional Competitive Snapshot
| Metric | India (2026) | Malaysia (Johor) | Vietnam | Japan |
| Primary tax incentive | 21-year tax holiday | 5–10 year ITA/PS | Effective ~1% tax | Limited |
| Yield on cost | Moderate (7–8% cap rate) | ~6–7% | High (17.5–18.8%) | Moderate |
| Renewable capacity | High headroom (10% demand headroom) | Tight supply (grid pressure) | 30% pledges | Transitioning |
| Regulatory stability | New IT Act 2025 | Established | Evolving | High |
| Digital sovereignty stance | Strong Data-in-India focus | Emerging | Emerging | Moderate |
This hereby frames the budget as catalysing a “re-contracting” between the state and the technology ecosystem.
The report cites:
Business opportunity implication:
This creates structured pipeline conditions for:
ISM 2.0 plus the 2047 horizon signals India is building for the next quarter century moving from service destination to “intelligence engine room” framing.
Future infrastructure will integrate:
AI-powered scanning expansion targets full container scanning across major ports, with implications for logistics costs, risk, dwell times, and export competitiveness for “Champion MSMEs.”
The report cites:
The data sources provide a clear investor framing of high-conviction themes.
The data sources collectively signal that investors must price “infrastructure externalities,” not just tax benefits.
Key risk variables:
Budget 2026–27 functions as a declaration of intent and a scaffolding for execution:
Prioritise opportunities where budget architecture reduces structural friction:
Founder operating principle: build on nationally prioritised infrastructure with security and governance baked in not bolted on later.
Use the tax and compliance simplification to accelerate structural upgrades:
The compounding window is real, but returns will favour players that integrate policy advantage with physical execution:
References:
India enters FY 2025–26 with a strong and unusually balanced macroeconomic position. Real GDP growth is estimated at ~7.4%, with real GVA growth at ~7.3%, reaffirming India’s position as the fastest-growing major economy. Growth is broad-based, supported simultaneously by consumption recovery, sustained investment, and improving financial stability.
This combination of growth, low inflation, and financial system resilience creates a more predictable operating environment for businesses and investors.
At the national level, India’s economic scale has itself become a structural advantage. The domestic market is now deep enough to support large, scalable businesses without over-dependence on exports or global capital cycles. The Economic Survey characterises FY26 growth as being driven by a “double engine” of consumption and investment, rather than short-term policy stimulus.
India’s global economic position continues to strengthen, particularly through services, remittances, and capital inflows. While global trade remains fragmented, India’s services-led model provides relative insulation from external shocks.

India’s growth composition remains structurally diversified, with services continuing to lead while manufacturing shows clear signs of revival. This diversification reduces vulnerability to sector-specific or cyclical shocks.
India’s fiscal strategy reflects a deliberate shift toward asset creation and long-term productivity enhancement. Public finances are increasingly geared toward capital expenditure rather than consumption-led spending, while medium-term debt sustainability indicators have improved.
India continues to attract sustained foreign capital, with inflows increasingly directed toward services, manufacturing, and technology-led sectors.

India’s startup ecosystem has transitioned from rapid expansion to a phase of consolidation and maturity.
Domestic investment remains a central pillar of India’s medium-term growth trajectory, supported by policy-led manufacturing and infrastructure creation.

India’s export resilience is increasingly driven by services and supported by large-scale infrastructure upgrades that reduce logistics and transaction costs.

India’s FY 2025–26 economic environment offers a rare combination of growth visibility, financial stability, and execution capacity. Strong domestic demand, improving credit conditions, and sustained public and private investment create a favourable backdrop for scaling businesses and deploying long-term capital.
References :-
Treelife is one of India’s most trusted legal and financial consulting firms, we simplify complex legal and financial challenges faced by startups, investors, and global businesses, by offering a wide range of services, including Virtual CFO, Legal Support, Tax & Regulatory, and Global Expansion assistance.
We have our offices in 4 cities, Mumbai, Delhi, Bangalore and GIFT City (Gujarat).
Our clients span diverse sectors such as technology, fintech, D2C, and foreign businesses. A few notable names include CleverTap, Rentomojo, Piper Serica, Snapwork, The Souled Store, and more.
]]>The Lenskart IPO has marked a defining chapter in India’s startup and retail evolution. Valued at an ambitious ₹70,000 crore ($8 billion), this initial public offering wasn’t just a fundraising event it was a statement of confidence in India’s maturing consumer-tech ecosystem.
Lenskart, India’s largest organized eyewear retailer, raised approximately ₹7,278 crore, pricing shares at ₹402 apiece. The offering commanded an eye-popping valuation multiple 235x–285x its FY25 earnings sparking intense discussion over whether the company was “priced for perfection.” Yet, the overwhelming investor response proved otherwise.
Founded as an online eyewear platform, Lenskart has transformed into an omnichannel powerhouse with over 2,800 stores across 14 countries. Its evolution represents a paradigm shift in Indian retail integrating technology, in-house manufacturing, and physical presence to solve long-standing inefficiencies in the eyewear market.
| Year | Milestone | Strategic Outcome |
|---|---|---|
| 2010 | Launch of Lenskart.com | Democratized access to eyewear in India |
| 2018 | Expansion to Tier-2 & Tier-3 cities | Captured unorganized market share |
| 2022 | Acquisition of Owndays (Japan) | Strengthened global presence |
| 2025 | IPO at ₹70,000 crore valuation | Established Lenskart as India’s optical leader |
Before its public debut, Lenskart executed a strategic three-phase valuation build-up that bridged its private-market credibility with public-market expectations.
Founder Peyush Bansal purchased 17 million shares at ₹52, establishing a conservative internal benchmark.
DMart founder Radhakishan Damani invested ₹90–₹100 crore pre-IPO a move that validated Lenskart’s valuation narrative and reassured investors.
IPO launched at ₹382–₹402 per share, almost 8x the founder’s purchase price, signaling strong growth conviction.
By securing a respected anchor investor before listing, Lenskart effectively de-risked valuation concerns and built market confidence ensuring a blockbuster IPO launch.
Lenskart’s Manufacturer-to-Consumer (M2C) model eliminates middlemen, capturing value across manufacturing, distribution, and retail.
Core advantages:
This vertical control drives efficiency, ensuring faster scalability and consistent product quality key factors behind the company’s lofty valuation.
India’s eyewear market, worth ₹74,000–₹78,800 crore, remains 77% unorganized. Lenskart’s structured approach gives it a first-mover advantage in formalizing the segment.
| Category | FY25 Share | FY30 Projection |
|---|---|---|
| Organized Retail | 20% | >30% |
| Unorganized Retail | 80% | Declining share |
With an estimated 4–6% overall market share and dominance in organized retail, Lenskart’s expansion potential remains massive. Its international reach (669 stores) and ownership of brands like Owndays, John Jacobs, and Vincent Chase enhance its global identity.
The ₹7,278 crore IPO received an overwhelming response across all investor categories:
| Investor Category | Subscription Level | Key Motivation |
|---|---|---|
| Qualified Institutional Buyers (QIBs) | 40× | Confidence in scalability and business model |
| Non-Institutional Investors (NIIs) | 18× | Strong faith in listing gains |
| Retail Investors | 8× | Trust in Lenskart’s brand and growth story |
The grey market premium (GMP) indicated potential listing gains of 8–18%, reaffirming Lenskart’s credibility as a growth-driven consumer brand.
The ₹2,150 crore raised through fresh issue will fund expansion across three focus areas domestic growth, international scaling, and technology upgrades.
This expansion aims to bridge India’s accessibility gap while enhancing brand penetration.
This ensures Lenskart sustains its technological edge while driving profitability.
Going public brings new responsibilities and scrutiny.
Delivering predictable results will determine whether Lenskart can justify its premium valuation long-term.
The Lenskart IPO represents a maturing moment for India’s startup ecosystem proving that local consumer-tech companies can achieve scale, profitability, and investor confidence simultaneously.
From a ₹5 billion private valuation to a ₹70,000 crore public listing, Lenskart’s journey exemplifies:
This success sets the tone for upcoming Indian startup IPOs, inspiring companies to build not just for valuation but for sustainable leadership.
References:
https://www.bqprime.com/markets/lenskart-ipo-details-valuation-growth-outlook
]]>The Open Network for Digital Commerce (ONDC) is India’s government-backed initiative designed to make online commerce as open and interoperable as UPI made digital payments. Instead of being locked into a single platform like Amazon or Flipkart, ONDC allows buyers and sellers to connect across multiple apps, ensuring wider choice for consumers and fairer access for startups, MSMEs, and kirana stores. Launched by the Department of Industry and Internal Trade (DPIIT), Ministry of Commerce and Industry, India and Incorporated under the Companies Act on December 30, 2021, ONDC is supported by leading banks including State Bank of India, Axis Bank, Kotak Mahindra Bank, HDFC Bank, ICICI Bank, and Punjab National Bank.
In 2026, this matters more than ever. India’s e-commerce sector is on track to exceed USD 200 billion by 2030, yet traditional platforms have often favored large players with high commissions and restrictive policies. Through ONDC, the government aims to democratize digital trade, reduce monopolistic control, and empower small businesses to participate equally in this booming market. For startups, this means lower costs, greater reach, and a level playing field in India’s fast-growing digital economy.
The Open Network for Digital Commerce (ONDC) is a government-backed interoperable network for digital commerce that allows buyers and sellers to transact across multiple apps, much like how UPI transformed digital payments in India. Instead of being restricted to one platform, ONDC creates a common, open ecosystem where startups, small businesses, and consumers can interact without monopolistic barriers.
| Feature | ONDC | Traditional Platforms (Amazon, Flipkart) |
| Ownership | Open Network, non-profit Section 8 | Private companies |
| Access | Open to any buyer or seller app | Walled garden, platform-locked |
| Pricing | Transparent, lower commissions (3–5%) | High commissions (15–30%) |
| Interoperability | Yes, cross-app connectivity | No, siloed ecosystems |
In short, ONDC = open access, lower costs, and more opportunities a framework built to democratize digital commerce in India and fuel its projected $200+ billion e-commerce market by 2030
The Open Network for Digital Commerce (ONDC) is built to function like a digital marketplace infrastructure, connecting buyers, sellers, and logistics providers across multiple apps. Unlike traditional platforms where everything is locked within one ecosystem, ONDC ensures interoperability through the Beckn Protocol, an open-source framework designed for seamless discovery and transactions.
| Step | Traditional E-Commerce | ONDC (Open Network for Digital Commerce) |
| Product Search | Limited to one app’s sellers | Discovery across all registered seller apps |
| Seller Choice | Only platform-registered sellers | Any seller connected to ONDC network |
| Delivery | Platform’s own logistics only | Multiple third-party logistics partners |
| Payments | Platform-controlled checkout | Open network with secure reconciliation |
In simple terms, ONDC works like the “UPI of commerce”—buyers and sellers use their preferred apps, but the network connects them all, ensuring open access, fair competition, and seamless delivery.
The Open Network for Digital Commerce (ONDC) is designed to solve the biggest challenges faced by Indian startups, MSMEs, and kirana stores trying to sell online. By breaking platform monopolies and lowering entry barriers, ONDC empowers smaller players to compete fairly with large e-commerce giants.
| Metric | Value (Jan 2025) | Source |
| Sellers onboarded | 3.5 lakh+ | PIB |
| Monthly transactions | 1.2 crore+ | PIB |
| Average commission rate | 3–5% | Protean |
| Potential market size | $200B+ by 2030 | EY |
The Open Network for Digital Commerce (ONDC) is more than just another digital initiative—it is a structural reform for India’s e-commerce sector. By creating an open, interoperable, and government-backed network, ONDC addresses long-standing challenges such as platform monopolies, high costs for small sellers, and limited consumer choices.
| Impact Area | Traditional Platforms | ONDC Advantage |
| Seller Visibility | Restricted to platform policies | Open & equal access |
| Participation of MSMEs/Kiranas | Limited due to costs & tech barriers | Inclusive onboarding |
| Market Structure | Oligopolistic, dominated by few players | Open, competitive |
| Consumer Benefits | Limited choice, high pricing | Wider options, transparent pricing |
ONDC is positioned as the “UPI moment for e-commerce”—breaking down barriers, fostering inclusivity, and ensuring that India’s projected $200B+ digital commerce market by 2030 is not controlled by a handful of players. For both startups and kiranas, it creates a sustainable path to growth, while consumers enjoy greater choice and better pricing.
For Indian startups, joining the Open Network for Digital Commerce (ONDC) is a straightforward process that opens doors to nationwide visibility, lower costs, and access to millions of digital buyers. Unlike traditional marketplaces, onboarding to ONDC does not require exclusive contracts or high platform fees.
Pro Tip: Many startups choose to work with Technology Service Providers (TSPs), who offer API integration, catalog management, and logistics support—helping businesses onboard faster and scale efficiently.
| Step | Requirement | Outcome |
| Seller App Selection | GoFrugal, Digiit, Mystore, eSamudaay | Access to ONDC network |
| Compliance | KYC + GST registration | Verified business profile |
| Catalog Upload | Products, pricing, logistics preferences | Nationwide visibility across buyer apps |
| Go Live | Final approval on Seller App | Sales enabled via ONDC ecosystem |
For early-stage startups, ONDC is not just an alternative channel—it’s a gateway to compete with large players and build a sustainable digital presence.
The Open Network for Digital Commerce (ONDC) makes online shopping as easy and universal as UPI payments. Consumers don’t need to download a new app to use ONDC—instead, they can access it through familiar buyer apps like Paytm, PhonePe, Meesho, and Magicpin.
Imagine craving biryani in Delhi:
| Feature | Traditional Platforms | ONDC Advantage |
| App Dependence | Limited to one app (e.g., Amazon, Zomato) | Multiple apps connected to one network |
| Seller Visibility | Only platform-listed sellers | Access to local kiranas, startups, and FPOs |
| Pricing Options | Controlled by platforms | Transparent & competitive pricing |
| Payment Options | Platform checkout only | UPI + multiple digital payments |
In short, ONDC puts consumers at the center of digital commerce by offering choice, transparency, and convenience—all within apps they already use daily.
While the Open Network for Digital Commerce (ONDC) has made impressive progress onboarding over 3.5 lakh sellers and processing 1.2 crore+ monthly transactions as of January 2025, the network is still in its early growth phase. Startups and policymakers must be mindful of certain challenges and limitations that need to be addressed for ONDC to achieve its full potential.
| Challenge | Impact on Ecosystem | Next Steps Needed |
| Low Awareness outside metros | Slower consumer adoption in Tier 2/3 | Awareness campaigns, digital literacy |
| Complex Seller Integration | Slower MSME onboarding | Simplified TSP tools, training support |
| Weak Dispute Resolution | Lower consumer trust | Strong grievance framework, verified ratings |
| Logistics Fragmentation | Inconsistent delivery experience | Standardized SLAs, nationwide partnerships |
As of January 2025, ONDC has moved from pilot phase to large-scale adoption, showing measurable traction across India. These figures highlight how the Open Network for Digital Commerce is rapidly shaping India’s e-commerce ecosystem.
Key ONDC Metrics (2025)
| Metric | Value (2025) | Source |
| Sellers onboarded | 3.5 lakh+ | PIB |
| Cities covered | 600+ | PIB |
| Monthly transactions | 1.2 crore+ | PIB |
| Commission range | 3–5% | Protean |
| Market potential (2030) | $200B+ | EY |
These numbers show that ONDC is already creating critical mass, reducing costs for sellers, and opening up nationwide access to consumers.
The next phase of ONDC’s growth focuses on scale, inclusivity, and innovation. Industry experts (EY, Antler, PIB) project that ONDC could fundamentally transform India’s digital commerce landscape by 2030.
The Open Network for Digital Commerce (ONDC) is India’s bold step towards building an open, transparent, and inclusive e-commerce ecosystem. By lowering commissions to 3–5%, enabling 3.5 lakh+ sellers across 600+ cities, and providing nationwide access through apps like Paytm, PhonePe, and Meesho, ONDC empowers startups, kiranas, MSMEs, and consumers alike. Much like UPI transformed digital payments, ONDC is set to democratize digital trade, reduce monopolistic control, and drive India’s $200B+ e-commerce market potential by 2030. For entrepreneurs and small businesses, joining ONDC today means securing a fair, scalable, and future-ready presence in India’s digital economy.
]]>Key components of the MII framework include a focus on improving the Ease of Doing Business (EoDB), liberalizing Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) policies, developing robust physical and digital infrastructure through programs like PM GatiShakti and the National Logistics Policy, and implementing targeted interventions such as the Production Linked Incentive (PLI) scheme across strategic sectors. The initiative is further supported by an interconnected ecosystem encompassing Skill India, Startup India, Digital India, taxation reforms (like the Goods and Services Tax – GST), and efforts towards harmonizing labor laws.
Over the past decade, MII has contributed to a significant rise in FDI inflows, notable improvements in India’s EoDB rankings, and substantial growth in specific manufacturing sectors, particularly electronics, defence, and pharmaceuticals, often catalyzed by the PLI scheme. However, challenges persist, including the unmet target of increasing manufacturing’s share in GDP to 25%, ensuring broad-based job creation commensurate with initial ambitions, bridging persistent skill gaps, and ensuring consistent implementation of reforms across states and sectors.
This report provides a comprehensive analysis of the Make in India initiative, detailing its origins, objectives, framework, focus sectors, and key schemes like PLI. It examines the procedures for investment, the legal and regulatory landscape, the role of supporting ecosystem initiatives, and assesses the overall impact through statistical data and sector-specific case studies. The report concludes with an outlook on the future trajectory of India’s manufacturing ambitions and potential considerations for stakeholders.
The launch of the Make in India initiative occurred during a period of considerable economic concern for India. After years of robust growth averaging around 7.7% between 2002 and 2011, India’s GNP growth rate had decelerated significantly, hovering around 5% in 2013 and 2014.1 The optimism surrounding emerging markets had waned, and India found itself labelled as one of the ‘Fragile Five’ economies, perceived as vulnerable to global economic shocks.2 This slowdown raised questions among global investors about India’s potential and prompted domestic concerns about sustaining the country’s development trajectory.3 The lagging manufacturing sector was identified as a key area needing revitalization to spur broader economic growth and create employment.4 India seemed poised on the brink of economic challenges, necessitating a significant policy push.3
The timing and stated goals of MII suggest it was not merely a promotional campaign but a strategic response aimed at addressing these perceived economic vulnerabilities. The ambitious targets set for manufacturing’s GDP contribution and job creation point towards an intention to engineer a structural shift in the economy, reducing over-reliance on the services sector and building greater industrial resilience.5
Against this critical backdrop, the Make in India initiative was formally launched by Prime Minister Narendra Modi on September 25, 2014.1 Its overarching vision was to transform India into a leading global destination for design and manufacturing.2 The core objectives articulated were multi-fold:

Beyond being an economic program or a marketing slogan (‘Goodbye red tape, hello red carpet’ 1), Make in India was presented as representing a fundamental shift in the government’s approach towards industry.3 It signified a move away from a purely regulatory role towards becoming a facilitator and partner in economic development, embodying the principle of ‘Minimum Government, Maximum Governance’.3 This involved a comprehensive overhaul of outdated policies and processes.3 The emphasis on changing the governmental mindset suggests an official acknowledgment that previous administrative and policy environments were perceived as impediments to industrial growth, necessitating internal process re-engineering alongside external promotion efforts.3
MII was positioned as a pioneering ‘Vocal for Local’ initiative, aimed at showcasing India’s industrial potential globally while boosting domestic capabilities.2 It served as a galvanizing call to action for India’s citizens, business leaders, and potential international partners.3 An underlying theme was the pursuit of quality and environmental consciousness, encapsulated in the slogan ‘Zero Defect, Zero Effect’, aiming for products manufactured without defects and without adverse environmental impact.29
The Make in India initiative is structured around four key pillars, designed to create a synergistic effect boosting entrepreneurship and manufacturing.13
The explicit articulation of these four pillars demonstrates a structured, holistic approach. It recognizes that improvements in the regulatory environment (‘New Processes’), physical connectivity (‘New Infrastructure’), targeted sector promotion (‘New Sectors’), and government engagement (‘New Mindset’) are interconnected and mutually reinforcing elements necessary for boosting manufacturing.
The Make in India initiative has evolved since its inception:
This evolution from planning (1.0) to implementation (2.0) and a proposed future focus on global integration and resilience (3.0) suggests an adaptive strategy. The initiative appears to be learning from initial outcomes and responding to changing global economic dynamics, moving beyond basic promotion to tackle more complex structural and international challenges.6
The implementation of Make in India involves several key government bodies and agencies:
Under Make in India 2.0, the government identified 27 specific sectors as priority areas for development, aiming to leverage India’s strengths and attract investment across a diverse range of industries.2 These sectors are broadly categorized into manufacturing and services, with coordination handled by DPIIT and the Department of Commerce, respectively.20
The inclusion of a significant number of service sectors within an initiative primarily aimed at boosting manufacturing underscores a broader economic development perspective. It acknowledges the critical interdependencies between goods production and supporting services like logistics, IT, finance, design, and R&D. A competitive manufacturing sector requires a robust service ecosystem, and conversely, a thriving service sector often supports and enables manufacturing growth. This integrated approach aims to strengthen the entire value chain, not just isolated factory operations.
| Manufacturing Sectors (Coordinated by DPIIT) | Service Sectors (Coordinated by Dept. of Commerce) |
| 1. Aerospace and Defence | 16. Information Technology & IT enabled Services (IT & ITeS) |
| 2. Automotive and Auto Components | 17. Tourism and Hospitality Services |
| 3. Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices | 18. Medical Value Travel |
| 4. Bio-Technology | 19. Transport and Logistics Services |
| 5. Capital Goods | 20. Accounting and Finance Services |
| 6. Textile and Apparels | 21. Audio Visual Services |
| 7. Chemicals and Petro chemicals | 22. Legal Services |
| 8. Electronics System Design and Manufacturing (ESDM) | 23. Communication Services |
| 9. Leather & Footwear | 24. Construction and Related Engineering Services |
| 10. Food Processing | 25. Environmental Services |
| 11. Gems and Jewellery | 26. Financial Services |
| 12. Shipping | 27. Education Services |
| 13. Railways | |
| 14. Construction | |
| 15. New and Renewable Energy |
(Source: Derived from 4)
Introduced in March 2020 and expanded subsequently, the Production Linked Incentive (PLI) scheme has emerged as a central pillar of the government’s ‘Atmanirbhar Bharat’ (Self-Reliant India) vision and a key implementation tool for the Make in India initiative.2 It represents a significant strategic shift from the broad promotional activities of MII 1.0 towards a more targeted, incentive-driven industrial policy focused on specific sectors deemed critical for national self-reliance and global competitiveness.30
The PLI scheme aims to achieve several interconnected objectives:
The government committed a significant financial outlay of ₹1.97 lakh crore (approximately US$24-28 billion) for the PLI schemes across 14 sectors, typically spread over a five-to-six-year incentive period.2 An additional allocation of ₹19,500 crore was made specifically for the High Efficiency Solar PV Modules PLI scheme in the 2022-23 budget.30
The PLI scheme strategically targets 14 key sectors identified as critical for India’s industrial growth, technological advancement, and self-reliance.
| Sector |
| 1. Large Scale Electronics Manufacturing (including Mobile Phones) |
| 2. IT Hardware (Laptops, Tablets, PCs, Servers) |
| 3. Critical Key Starting Materials (KSMs)/Drug Intermediaries & Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients (APIs) |
| 4. Pharmaceuticals Drugs |
| 5. Manufacturing of Medical Devices |
| 6. Automobiles and Auto Components |
| 7. Telecom & Networking Products |
| 8. Specialty Steel |
| 9. White Goods (Air Conditioners and LEDs) |
| 10. Food Products |
| 11. Textile Products: Man-Made Fibre (MMF) Segment and Technical Textiles |
| 12. High Efficiency Solar PV Modules |
| 13. Advanced Chemistry Cell (ACC) Battery |
| 14. Drones and Drone Components |
(Source: Derived from 2)
The defining feature of the PLI scheme is its performance-linked incentive structure.47 Eligible companies receive financial incentives calculated as a percentage (typically ranging from 4% to 6%, but varying significantly by sector, year, and product category) of their incremental sales or production value achieved over a pre-defined base year (commonly FY 2019-20).14 This incentive is provided for a specified duration, usually five consecutive years, subsequent to the base year.30 In essence, the scheme functions as a direct payment or subsidy rewarding increased domestic manufacturing output.30
While specific criteria vary by sector, general eligibility requirements typically include:
The application process for PLI schemes is generally managed online through dedicated portals set up by the respective implementing Ministries or designated Project Management Agencies (PMAs).
The PLI schemes, across the 14 sectors, have shown considerable traction in attracting investment and boosting manufacturing output, although disbursements took time to ramp up.
| Key Metric | Value / Number | Source / Date Reference |
| Approved Applications | ~755 – 764 | 2 (Dec 2024 – Mar 2025) |
| Investment Realized | ₹1.23 – ₹1.46 Lakh Crore | 2 (Mar – Aug 2024) |
| Incremental Production / Sales | ₹10.9 – ₹12.5 Lakh Crore | 37 (June – Aug 2024) |
| Exports Attributed | ~₹4 Lakh Crore | 30 (June – Aug 2024) |
| Employment Generated | ~8 – 9.5 Lakh (Direct & Indirect) | 2 (Mar – Aug 2024) |
| MSME Beneficiaries | ~176 | 30 (Aug 2023 – Mar 2025) |
| Incentive Disbursed | ₹14,020 Crore (across 10 sectors) | 54 (Mar 2025) |
Note: Figures represent cumulative data reported across various sources and dates. Investment realized and production generated figures reflect progress, while disbursements represent actual incentives paid out based on performance verification.
The reported metrics, especially the high investment commitments and production figures relative to the incentive outlay, suggest that the PLI mechanism has been effective in mobilizing capital and scaling up manufacturing in targeted sectors like electronics and auto. However, the disbursement figures, particularly in the initial years 54, were relatively low compared to the potential incentives earned, possibly indicating lags in project commissioning, meeting performance thresholds, claim submission, or verification processes. This highlights the importance of efficient scheme administration alongside attractive incentives.
Successfully participating in the Make in India initiative requires understanding the facilitative mechanisms, regulatory policies, and available incentives. The government has undertaken numerous reforms aimed at creating a more conducive environment for manufacturing investment.
India maintains a generally liberal FDI policy, aiming to attract foreign capital, technology, and expertise to fuel economic growth, particularly under the Make in India initiative.
| Sector | FDI Limit (%) | Route | Key Conditions/Notes |
| Manufacturing (General) | 100% | Automatic | Subject to applicable laws/regulations. |
| Defence Manufacturing | 100% | Up to 74% Auto | Above 74% via Government route. Subject to security clearance and specific conditions. 5 |
| Pharmaceuticals (Greenfield) | 100% | Automatic | |
| Pharmaceuticals (Brownfield) | 100% | Up to 74% Auto | Above 74% via Government route. 42 |
| Medical Devices | 100% | Automatic | 13 |
| Telecom Services | 100% | Automatic | Previously capped, liberalized to 100% Auto. 19 |
| E-commerce (Marketplace Model) | 100% | Automatic | Subject to specific conditions (e.g., cannot own inventory). |
| E-commerce (Inventory-Based Model) | Prohibited | – | |
| Food Processing (Manufactured/Produced India) | 100% | Government | For trading, including through e-commerce. |
| Automotive | 100% | Automatic | 42 |
| Renewable Energy | 100% | Automatic | 43 |
| Construction Development (Townships, etc.) | 100% | Automatic | Subject to conditions like minimum area, lock-in periods (may have been eased). 42 |
| Railway Infrastructure | 100% | Automatic | For construction, operation, maintenance in specific permitted areas (e.g., high-speed projects). 13 |
| Insurance Companies | 74% | Automatic | Requires Indian management & control. Proposal for 100% exists with conditions. 13 |
| Banking (Private Sector) | 74% | Up to 49% Auto | Above 49% up to 74% via Government route. 42 |
| Air Transport Services (Scheduled/Regional) | Up to 100% | Up to 49% Auto | Above 49% via Government route. Substantial ownership & effective control must remain with Indian nationals. |
| Print Media (News & Current Affairs) | 26% | Government | 42 |
(Source: Derived from.5 Note: FDI policy is dynamic; investors must consult the latest official Consolidated FDI Policy document issued by DPIIT.)
The tax regime is a critical factor influencing manufacturing investment decisions. India has undertaken significant reforms in both indirect and direct taxation.
Protecting innovation is vital for a manufacturing-led growth strategy. India has a comprehensive IPR framework and has taken steps to strengthen it.
Navigating the regulatory landscape is essential for manufacturers in India. Compliance requirements vary significantly depending on the industry.
The overall ecosystem reflects a dynamic mix of liberalization (like high FDI limits and corporate tax cuts) and targeted state intervention (PLI, PMP). Simultaneously, there are ongoing efforts to simplify the operating environment through EoDB reforms, GST implementation, single window systems, and the proposed consolidation of labor laws. Successfully navigating this landscape requires businesses to understand both the broad policy direction and the specific regulations, incentives, and procedures applicable to their sector, scale of operation, and chosen location(s) within India. While national EoDB rankings show improvement, the actual experience on the ground can vary significantly due to sector-specific rules (e.g., stringent pharma regulations 104), investment size triggering different approval layers 42, and the varying pace at which different states adopt and implement central reforms.35
The Make in India initiative does not operate in isolation. Its success is intrinsically linked to a range of complementary government programs aimed at strengthening various facets of the Indian economy and creating a supportive ecosystem for industrial growth. These initiatives work synergistically to address critical prerequisites for a thriving manufacturing sector.
Launched in July 2015 24, the Skill India Mission is fundamental to realizing MII’s goals by addressing the critical need for a skilled workforce.2 Manufacturing, especially advanced manufacturing involving automation and precision engineering, requires workers proficient in specific technical skills.33 India faces a recognized skill gap, where many individuals lack the practical, industry-relevant skills demanded by employers.8 Skill India aims to bridge this gap by providing vocational training and upskilling opportunities across numerous sectors, with ambitious targets like training over 400 million people by 2022 (initial goal).24 Key components include the National Skill Development Corporation (NSDC) facilitating private sector participation, and schemes like Pradhan Mantri Kaushal Vikas Yojana (PMKVY) offering short-term training.24 The mission focuses on aligning training with industry needs, promoting apprenticeships, and establishing skill development centers.24 Equipping the workforce with skills relevant to Industry 4.0 (AI, robotics, digital manufacturing) is also a focus area.8 A readily available pool of skilled labor enhances India’s attractiveness for manufacturing investment.33
Launched in January 2016 2, the Startup India initiative aims to build a robust ecosystem for nurturing innovation, entrepreneurship, and new business ventures.2 This directly supports the MII objective of fostering innovation.11 Startups often drive technological advancements and can play a significant role in developing new products and processes within the manufacturing sector, particularly in emerging fields like drones, AI, and medtech.47 Startup India provides a range of support measures, including:
The Digital India programme, launched around 2014-15 1, aims to transform India into a digitally empowered society and knowledge economy. It provides the essential digital infrastructure – widespread internet connectivity, digital identity (Aadhaar), digital payments – that underpins the adoption of advanced manufacturing technologies.27 This initiative is a key enabler for Industry 4.0, the fourth industrial revolution characterized by the integration of cyber-physical systems, IoT, AI, big data analytics, cloud computing, robotics, and automation into manufacturing processes.27
Digital India facilitates the creation of ‘smart factories’ where machines communicate, processes are optimized in real-time using data analytics, quality control is enhanced through AI-driven vision systems, and supply chains become more transparent and efficient.27 This leads to increased productivity, reduced waste and downtime (e.g., through predictive maintenance), enhanced product quality, and greater flexibility to meet changing market demands.28 Government initiatives like the India Semiconductor Mission, aiming to build a domestic semiconductor and display ecosystem 2, and support for AI and robotics 109 further align MII with Industry 4.0 trends. The adoption of these digital technologies is seen as crucial for Indian manufacturing to become globally competitive.107
Addressing India’s historical infrastructure deficit is critical for manufacturing competitiveness. Several large-scale initiatives aim to create seamless connectivity and reduce logistics costs:
The concerted push on infrastructure development, particularly through the integrated planning approach of GatiShakti and NLP, addresses a long-standing bottleneck for Indian manufacturing. High logistics costs and inefficient transport networks have historically hampered competitiveness. These initiatives, by focusing on both physical infrastructure and process improvements, offer the potential for a more tangible and significant boost to manufacturing efficiency compared to earlier MII phases that relied more heavily on promotion and incremental regulatory reforms.2
As detailed in Section 6, the implementation of GST 1 and the reduction in corporate tax rates 14 are integral parts of the ecosystem supporting Make in India. They collectively aim to simplify the tax structure, reduce the tax burden on manufacturers, lower operational and logistics costs, eliminate tax cascading, and improve overall competitiveness, thereby creating a more favorable fiscal environment for domestic production and investment.92
Recognizing that complex and archaic labor laws could impede EoDB and manufacturing growth, the government undertook a major reform by consolidating approximately 29-30 central labor laws into four comprehensive codes 35:
The stated objectives of these codes are to simplify compliance for businesses, improve EoDB, promote formalization of the workforce, enhance worker safety and welfare, and provide greater flexibility in labor deployment.35 However, the implementation of these codes has been delayed. While the central government passed the codes, labor is a concurrent subject, requiring states to frame and notify their own rules for the codes to become effective nationwide.35 As of early 2025, while many states had reportedly drafted rules, universal notification and a final implementation date were still pending.35 Some trade unions have also expressed concerns, arguing that certain provisions, particularly in the Industrial Relations Code, could dilute worker protections.119 If and when implemented effectively, these codes have the potential to significantly impact the manufacturing landscape by simplifying the complex web of legacy regulations.33
These interconnected initiatives demonstrate that the government views Make in India not just as a manufacturing policy, but as part of a broader economic transformation strategy. Success hinges on the effective functioning and synergy between these programs – manufacturing growth requires skilled people, innovative ideas, digital tools, efficient movement of goods, a fair tax system, and modern labor regulations.6
A decade since its launch, the Make in India initiative has demonstrably influenced India’s economic trajectory, policy landscape, and global positioning. Assessing its impact requires examining key performance indicators, celebrating successes through specific examples, and acknowledging the persistent challenges.
The divergence between strong FDI/export performance in specific areas and the stagnant overall manufacturing GDP share is notable. It suggests that while MII and associated policies like PLI have successfully attracted capital and boosted output and exports in targeted, often high-value sectors, this hasn’t yet translated into the broad-based industrial expansion needed to significantly lift the entire manufacturing sector’s weight in the overall economy.
| Indicator | FY 2014 (approx.) | FY 2019 (approx.) | FY 2024 (approx.) / Latest | Notes |
| Manufacturing Share of GDP (%) | ~16-17% | ~15-16% | ~15.9% | Target was 25% by 2022/25. Stagnation/slight decline observed. 5 |
| Total FDI Inflow (USD Bn) | $36.0 (FY14) | $62.0 (FY19) | $70.97 (FY23) | Significant overall increase post-MII launch. 16 |
| Manufacturing FDI Equity Inflow (USD Bn) | ~$12 (FY14 est.) | ~$8 (FY19) | ~$20 (FY23) | Shows growth 2014-2023 compared to 2005-2014, but annual figures fluctuate. 15 |
| Merchandise Exports (USD Bn) | $314.4 (FY14) | $330.1 (FY19) | $437.1 (FY24) | Reached record $451bn in FY23, slight dip in FY24 amid global slowdown. 121 |
| Overall Unemployment Rate (%) (PLFS) | N/A (Pre-PLFS) | 5.8% (2018-19) | 3.2% (2023-24) | Shows decline, indicating improved employment situation nationally. 84 |
(Note: Data compiled from various sources 5 and external references like RBI/DPIIT data for consistency. Exact figures may vary slightly based on reporting methodology and specific time periods. FY refers to Financial Year ending March 31st.)
The impact of Make in India is best illustrated through progress in specific sectors:
These case studies suggest that targeted policy interventions, particularly the PLI scheme, combined with liberalized FDI and government focus, can yield significant results in specific sectors. Success appears concentrated where India has existing strengths (Pharma, Textiles), where global supply chains are shifting (Electronics), or where strategic imperatives drive investment (Defence, Renewables). This implies that while the broad MII umbrella provides direction, sector-specific strategies and incentives are crucial drivers of tangible outcomes.
Despite the successes, the Make in India journey faces several persistent challenges:
Over the past decade, the Make in India initiative has undeniably reshaped India’s industrial policy landscape and its engagement with the global economy. Launched as a strategic response to economic headwinds, it evolved from a broad promotional campaign into a multi-faceted program encompassing significant reforms in Ease of Doing Business, Foreign Direct Investment liberalization, targeted sectoral interventions like the Production Linked Incentive scheme, and massive investments in physical and digital infrastructure. Key successes include attracting record levels of FDI, improving India’s standing in global EoDB rankings (prior to their discontinuation), and catalyzing impressive growth and export competitiveness in specific strategic sectors such as electronics, defence, pharmaceuticals, and renewable energy components, often driven by the PLI scheme.
However, the initiative’s journey has also been marked by persistent challenges. The ambitious goal of raising the manufacturing sector’s share in GDP to 25% remains elusive, indicating that a fundamental structural shift towards manufacturing-led growth has yet to fully materialize. Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s flagship “Make in India” initiative was launched with the ambitious goal of transforming India into a global manufacturing powerhouse. While the campaign successfully captured international attention and positioned India as an attractive investment destination, critics argue that the ground realities haven’t fully matched the hype. Industry leaders and policy analysts have urged PM Modi to bridge the gap between vision and execution by addressing long-standing structural challenges such as bureaucratic inefficiencies, regulatory hurdles, and inadequate infrastructure. Without these systemic reforms, many warn that “Make in India” risks being seen more as a branding exercise than a catalyst for industrial transformation. While employment has grown in certain segments and overall unemployment has decreased, the scale of job creation specifically within manufacturing may not have met the high initial expectations. Implementation consistency, bridging the skill gap for modern industry, further reducing compliance burdens (especially for SMEs), and overcoming infrastructure deficits continue to be critical areas requiring sustained focus.
India currently stands as a significant and rapidly evolving player in the global manufacturing landscape. Its primary strengths include a large and growing domestic market, favorable demographics providing a large potential workforce, a stable democratic polity, continuous government focus on manufacturing, improving physical and digital infrastructure, and a burgeoning innovation ecosystem fueled by initiatives like Startup India. The country has demonstrated resilience, maintaining relatively strong economic growth despite recent global uncertainties.84 However, weaknesses such as relatively high logistics costs (though declining), persistent skill mismatches, complex regulatory navigation (despite improvements), and varying levels of implementation effectiveness across states need continued attention.
The trajectory of Make in India appears set towards deepening domestic capabilities and enhancing global integration. Potential future directions include:
In conclusion, Make in India has set a clear direction for India’s industrial ambitions. While significant progress has been achieved in attracting investment and boosting capabilities in key areas, sustained effort in implementation, skill development, infrastructure creation, and continued policy adaptation is necessary to overcome the remaining challenges and fully realize the vision of transforming India into a truly global manufacturing powerhouse.
Works Cited:
India’s online gaming industry is at a decisive turning point. With over 500 million users and revenues crossing ₹25,000–31,000 crore in 2024, gaming has been one of the fastest-growing segments of the digital economy. Real-Money Gaming (RMG) including fantasy sports, rummy, and poker contributed nearly 85% of industry revenues, with projections of reaching ₹50,000 crore by 2028.
The Promotion and Regulation of Online Gaming Bill, 2025 (“Gaming Bill 2025”) aims to reshape this sector by banning all forms of real-money gaming while promoting e-sports and social gaming. While the Bill seeks to protect users from risks like addiction and financial losses, it has also sparked debates about economic disruption, constitutional validity, and employment impact.
The Bill introduces three key categories:
The Bill sets up a Central Gaming Authority with powers to classify games, regulate platforms, and conduct searches in virtual digital spaces. Penalties include:
| Impact Area | Details |
|---|---|
| Industry Loss | RMG (USD 2.2B in 2023, projected USD 8.6B by 2028) faces elimination. |
| Tax Revenue | Potential loss of ₹20,000 crore; GST collections of ₹75,000+ crore at risk. |
| Startups & Investment | Over 400 startups and ₹22,931 crore of funding endangered. |
| Employment | Over 100,000 jobs directly at risk; sector had potential to create 250,000 more. |
| User Safety | Ban could push 568 million gamers to offshore platforms with no consumer protection. |
| Innovation | Sector employing 200,000+ professionals and attracting ₹25,000 crore FDI could stagnate. |
Indian courts have upheld skill-based games (like fantasy sports and poker) as legitimate businesses, not gambling. A blanket ban may be struck down as disproportionate under Article 19(1)(g), which protects the right to carry on business.
The Bill allows warrantless searches, arrests, and digital surveillance. Critics argue this violates privacy rights under the Puttaswamy judgment (2017) and could be seen as excessive and unconstitutional.
The government insists that the law is not against gaming as a whole:
The Gaming Bill 2025 is a watershed moment for India’s digital economy. While it attempts to regulate harmful practices, its blanket prohibition on real-money games risks:
The future of India’s gaming sector will depend on judicial review of the Bill and the government’s ability to balance user protection with economic growth.
Treelife helps entrepreneurs and investors navigate legal and financial complexities in emerging sectors like gaming, technology, and digital platforms.
Write to us: support@treelife.in
India is experiencing a significant surge in wealth, with the Hurun India Rich List 2024 reporting a total of 1,539 Ultra High Net-Worth Individuals (UHNWI), a substantial increase from 140 in 2013. The country’s billionaire count has also reached a record 334, marking a 29 percent increase from the previous year, with a new billionaire emerging every five days in 2024. This growth isn’t limited to established tycoons; a new generation of wealth creators, including Harshil Mathur & Shashank Kumar (Razorpay) and Kaivalya Vohra (Zepto), are also contributing to this rise. Alongside this, the HNI (High Net-Worth Individual) population, defined as individuals with investable assets exceeding $1 million, saw a 4.5% year-on-year growth in 2022. This era of burgeoning wealth underscores the critical importance of robust succession planning.
At Treelife, we have developed an in-depth guide to help UHNWIs and families understand the need for succession planning and how it can be used to secure and transfer wealth efficiently.
Succession planning is the strategic process of managing and distributing your assets both during your lifetime and after your passing. Its primary objective is to ensure a smooth transfer of business ownership, leadership, and family wealth, while proactively maintaining harmony and preventing disputes among beneficiaries.
With an increasing number of High Net-Worth Individuals (HNIs) and families in India, succession planning has never been more crucial. Below are the reasons why it is needed:
When it comes to succession planning, two common legal instruments are used: Wills and Trusts.
A Will is a legal document that dictates how assets are to be distributed after death. It offers straightforward benefits for individuals with simple estates or those who wish to maintain control of their assets posthumously.
Who it works for: Individuals with straightforward estates and clear heirs, and those who desire immediate, direct legal control over their estate after death.
Process Flow:
Important Note: If a person dies without a will, their wealth is distributed to legal heirs as per the applicable succession law based on their faith.
A Trust, on the other hand, is a legal arrangement where assets are transferred to a trustee for the benefit of designated beneficiaries. Trusts are effective in maintaining privacy, protecting assets from creditors, and ensuring long-term control.
Typical Structure:
Pros of a Trust:
Cons of a Trust:
Understanding how trusts are taxed is essential for effective succession planning. The type of trust and its setup can significantly affect the tax liabilities of the trust and its beneficiaries.
Proper tax planning ensures that the trust’s assets are maximized and wealth is protected for future generations.
Practical Insights:
Succession planning isn’t just about creating legal documents—it’s about understanding how your family and business will function in the future. The right strategy balances the ownership and management of wealth, ensuring that both are protected.
| Key Parameters | Will | Trust |
| Meaning | Provides for asset disposition upon death | Created by a settlor contributing wealth |
| Modification | Can be amended unlimited times; the latest will is valid | Terms can be modified based on trust deed provisions |
| Execution Timing | Becomes operational after the transferor’s death | Can be operational during the settlor’s lifetime or after death |
| Process of Disposition | Assets pass through the probate process | Assets are transferred based on predefined trust conditions |
| Court Involvement | Probate is required in most Indian states | Generally, no court involvement unless contested |
| Beneficiaries | Named in the will and receive assets post-probate | Defined in the trust deed |
| Conditions for Distribution | Specified in the will | Conditions can be set by the Trustee |
| Management | Executor is appointed to carry out the will | Trustees are appointed for ongoing management |
| Asset Protection | Limited protection, as assets remain in individual ownership | Provides protection from creditors and legal claims |
| Control & Governance | No control after death | Ensures long-term control and governance |
| Cost | The cost of preparing a will is minimal | Cost of setting up and upkeep for trust structure is high compared to a will |
With the increase in wealth across India, succession planning has become more than just an option; it’s a necessity for those looking to protect their legacy. By establishing clear governance, selecting the right tools (Will or Trust), and planning for potential tax implications, individuals can ensure that their wealth is preserved, protected, and efficiently passed down.
At Treelife, we specialize in succession planning to help you safeguard your wealth, protect your family’s interests, and ensure the smooth transition of your assets. Let’s work together to secure your legacy for future generations.
Contact us today to get started on your succession planning journey:
support@treelife.in
+91 99301 56000 | +91 22 6852 5768
Book a Consultation
In an increasingly interconnected global economy, startups and growing companies face the challenge of managing cross-border operations efficiently while complying with complex tax regulations. One critical area demanding attention is transfer pricing the pricing of transactions between related companies operating in different jurisdictions.
This comprehensive guide demystifies transfer pricing concepts, methods, regulatory frameworks, common challenges, and best practices, helping founders, CFOs, and finance teams navigate this complex terrain with confidence.
Transfer pricing refers to the price charged for goods, services, or intangible assets (like intellectual property) exchanged between related entities within the same multinational group. For example, when a U.S.-based startup sells software licenses to its Indian subsidiary, the price charged is a transfer price.
Why does this matter? Transfer pricing directly affects how profits are allocated among the entities and, consequently, how much tax is paid in each jurisdiction. Incorrect transfer prices can trigger tax audits, adjustments, penalties, and in some cases, double taxation where the same income is taxed in more than one country.
With estimates showing that over 60% of global trade occurs between related parties, governments worldwide prioritize transfer pricing enforcement to protect their tax base. For startups scaling internationally, understanding and managing transfer pricing is crucial to avoid costly disputes and maintain investor confidence.
The Arm’s Length Principle (ALP) is the foundation of transfer pricing globally. It requires that transactions between related parties be priced as if they were conducted between independent, unrelated parties under similar circumstances. This principle ensures fairness and prevents multinational companies from shifting profits artificially to minimize taxes.
For startups, this means intercompany transactions—whether for goods, services, royalties, or loans—must be priced at fair market value. Applying ALP involves comparing related-party transactions with similar transactions between independent parties, often through benchmarking studies and economic analyses.
Several internationally recognized methods exist to determine arm’s length prices, each with specific applications:
Choosing the right method requires careful consideration of the transaction type, data availability, and functional analysis.
The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) provides internationally accepted transfer pricing guidelines adopted by over 120 countries. Its Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (BEPS) project strengthened rules on transparency and documentation, introducing mandatory country-by-country reporting and master/local file documentation.
India’s transfer pricing laws, under the Income Tax Act, 1961, align closely with OECD standards but have unique features:
Coca-Cola vs. IRS:
One of the most prominent examples discussed in the guide is the transfer pricing dispute involving Coca-Cola and the U.S. Internal Revenue Service (IRS). This case highlights the complexity and financial risks associated with transfer pricing compliance, especially for multinational corporations with substantial intangible assets.
Coca-Cola faced scrutiny over the allocation of profits between its U.S. headquarters and foreign subsidiaries involved in the manufacturing and distribution of concentrate. The IRS challenged the transfer pricing methodology used for royalty payments on intangible assets, asserting that Coca-Cola’s pricing undervalued the profits attributable to the U.S. operations.
The U.S. Tax Court upheld the IRS’s adjustments, significantly increasing Coca-Cola’s taxable income in the United States. The case underscored the importance of a rigorous transfer pricing framework, especially in valuing intangibles and conducting detailed functional analyses.
Transfer pricing is a complex but critical area in international business and taxation. Startups, CFOs, and finance teams must understand and apply transfer pricing principles to maintain compliance, reduce tax risks, and support sustainable growth.
By adopting a clear transfer pricing policy, maintaining robust documentation, choosing appropriate methods, and staying abreast of evolving regulations—especially under India’s regime and global OECD standards—businesses can confidently navigate transfer pricing challenges.
If your company needs assistance in managing transfer pricing risks or compliance, Treelife’s experts are ready to help. Reach out to priya@treelife.in for tailored solutions.
The International Financial Services Centre (IFSC) at GIFT City has emerged as a pivotal platform for Indian financial institutions to tap into international capital markets. The debt market at IFSC showed impressive growth in FY 2024-25, with total issuances reaching USD 6.99 billion across 57 listings, underscoring its growing role as a global capital hub. This article provides an in-depth analysis of the trends, sectoral shifts, and emerging patterns shaping the debt landscape at IFSC.
Cumulative Issuance:
In FY 2024-25, GIFT IFSC facilitated 57 debt issuances, totaling USD 6.99 billion, reflecting its strong presence in the global debt market. Although issuance volumes fluctuated throughout the year, the total issuance volume for the year remained significant, reinforcing IFSC’s role as a key player in global capital flow.
Sectoral Distribution:
The Non-Banking Financial Companies (NBFCs) dominated the market, accounting for 50 issuances totaling USD 5.23 billion. This highlights IFSC’s critical role in facilitating funding for Indian financial institutions, especially NBFCs, that are leveraging international capital markets to fuel their growth.
Issuer Profile:
The top five issuers by volume in FY 2024-25 were:
Together, these five issuers accounted for nearly 40% of the total market volume, highlighting some concentration within the market.
Fixed vs Floating Rate:
The market exhibited a clear preference for fixed-rate bonds, which made up 95% of the total value, with 22 issuances totaling USD 6.66 billion. In contrast, floating-rate bonds represented only 5% of the total value, with 35 issuances totaling USD 329.2 million. This reflects a demand for larger, more stable issuances through fixed-rate bonds, while floating-rate bonds cater to more specialized, smaller funding needs.
Coupon Rates:
Sustainable finance has gained significant traction at IFSC. In FY 2024-25, ESG-focused instruments accounted for 39.4% of the total debt issuance, with green bonds leading the charge.
This shift towards sustainable finance underlines the increasing interest in ESG investments and positions IFSC as a hub for sustainable capital flow.
The trustee services market at IFSC was split between Indian and foreign trustees. Key participants include global entities such as BNY Mellon, Deutsche Bank, and Citicorp International, along with Indian trustees like Catalyst Trusteeship.
This distribution shows the global and local participation in the IFSC debt market, further enhancing its accessibility to a wide range of institutional investors.
Out of the 57 issuances, 45.6% were rated, representing 89.5% of the total issuance volume. The ratings were predominantly high yield (BB+ and below), with 20 issuances amounting to USD 4.63 billion, while investment-grade bonds (BBB- and above) accounted for 6 issuances, totaling USD 1.63 billion.
The debt market at IFSC is evolving rapidly, offering substantial opportunities for investors and issuers alike. To navigate this dynamic market and explore tailored solutions for your business, connect with Treelife’s expert team.
Maharashtra continues to assert its dominance as India’s economic powerhouse, and the recently released Economic Survey 2024-25 not only reinforces this status but also sets the tone for a forward-looking growth narrative. From impressive economic fundamentals to a vibrant startup ecosystem, robust infrastructure, and strategic policy reforms, Maharashtra is setting benchmarks for inclusive and sustainable development.
This article presents a comprehensive deep dive into the highlights of the survey, accompanied by contextual insights and implications for entrepreneurs, investors, and businesses seeking to scale in India’s most dynamic state economy.
Solid Fundamentals, Strong Outlook Maharashtra’s economy is projected to grow at 7.3% in FY25 — a rate higher than India’s overall growth estimate of 6.5%. This comes on the back of a strong 7.6% real GSDP growth in FY24. More importantly, Maharashtra’s per capita income stands at ₹2.79 lakh (FY24), nearly 47% above the national average (₹1.89 lakh), highlighting superior prosperity levels and strong consumption potential.
| Category | Maharashtra | India |
| Population- 2011 census | 11.24 crore (9.3% of India) | 121.08 crore |
| Urbanization – 2011 census | 45.2% | 31.1% |
| Literacy Rate – 2011 census | 82.3% | 73% |
| Sex Ratio (females per 1,000 males) – 2011 census | 929 | 943 |
| Net Sown Area (2021-22) (lakh hectares) | 16.59 (11.8% of India) | 141 |
| Major Crops | Jowar (44.4%), Cotton (34%), Wheat (3.7) | Wheat ( 115.4 metric ton) Cotton (299.26 lakh bales) |
| Livestock (2019 Census) | 3.3 crore (6.2 of India) | 53.67 crore |
| Forest Area (2021) (sq.km) | 61,952 (8% of India) | 7,75,377 |
| Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) (2019-24) | 31% of India’s total | $709.84 billion |
| Small & Medium Enterprises | 46.74 lakh (14.3) | 326.65 lakh (total MSMEs in India) |
| Electricity Generation (2023-24) (million kWh) | 1,43,746 (8.3% of India) | 17,34,375 |
| Bank Branches (2024) | 13,929 (8.8% of India) | 1,59,130 |
| Gross State Domestic Product (GSDP) (2023-24) (₹ lakh crore) | 40.55 (13.5% of India) | 301.22 |
| Per Capita Income (₹) as per 31st March 2024 | 2,78,681 | 1,88,892 |
These figures are a testament to Maharashtra’s structural resilience and diversified growth engines, positioning it as an engine of India’s broader economic momentum.
Maharashtra by the Numbers The state accounts for 13.5% of India’s GDP — the highest share among all states. Its nominal GSDP is estimated at ₹40.56 lakh crore (~$550 billion), which places it ahead of many countries including Portugal, UAE, and Thailand.
With this scale, Maharashtra is not only the largest subnational economy in India but also one of the top 20 economic regions globally. The depth of its economy is driven by a diversified industrial base, high financial inclusion, and strong urban-rural economic linkages.
Not Just a Regional Leader If Maharashtra were a standalone nation, it would rank among the top 20 global economies in terms of GDP. Mumbai — the capital — is the nerve center of India’s financial ecosystem. It hosts institutions like RBI, SEBI, BSE, NSE, and serves as the operational base for many global banks and corporations.
This global positioning enhances investor confidence, facilitates capital flows, and elevates Maharashtra’s strategic significance on the international map. Moreover, the state’s efforts to integrate into global value chains through trade and investment policies further strengthen this standing.
A Balanced Growth Engine The GSDP composition highlights a structurally balanced economy:
Such diversification acts as a natural buffer against sector-specific downturns and underpins Maharashtra’s sustained economic momentum.
Sound and Sustainable Public Finances Maharashtra has demonstrated fiscal prudence while pursuing economic development:
Notably, committed expenditure (salaries, pensions, interest) forms about 60% of total expenditure — a fiscal challenge that requires efficiency reforms. Still, the state has fiscal headroom to expand capital investments and welfare spending.
Maharashtra Leads from the Front Maharashtra continues to be the top destination for foreign direct investment:
The government has complemented this with proactive facilitation through initiatives like MAITRI (single-window clearance), district investment councils, and sector-specific promotion.
Deep and Distributed Innovation Maharashtra has emerged as India’s most prolific startup hub:
Support infrastructure includes over 125 incubators, state-backed venture funds, innovation grants (like Maharashtra Startup Week), and women-focused startup incentives. The Maharashtra State Innovation Society (MSInS) has been instrumental in coordinating startup policy and programs.
Capital Inflows Beyond Metros In early 2024, the state conducted investment drives across 34 districts:
This decentralization of investment reflects the state’s commitment to inclusive industrial growth and job creation beyond Tier 1 cities.
A Trade Powerhouse Maharashtra ranks second in India’s merchandise exports with a 15.4% share in FY24. Key sectors include:
Infrastructure Highlights:
These trade-enabling assets position Maharashtra as a global manufacturing and services export hub.
The state’s fiscal headroom, deep consumer base, and integrated markets provide unparalleled leverage for long-term business expansion.
At Treelife, we work with high-growth businesses, startups, funds, and global investors to navigate Maharashtra’s economic landscape — from fundraising, structuring, tax & compliance to legal enablement.
If you’re looking to grow or invest in India’s most powerful state economy, let’s talk.
We simplify the complex — so you can focus on what matters most: building, scaling and creating impact.
Mahakumbh 2025 was more than just a spiritual event—it was a massive economic catalyst that reshaped Prayagraj and beyond. With 660 million attendees from 76 countries, this grand gathering generated ₹3 lakh crore (approximately $36 billion) in transactions, highlighting the intersection of faith and finance. From tourism and hospitality to fintech and startups, Mahakumbh 2025 showcased how religious events can fuel an entire ecosystem of economic growth.
Unlike the regular Kumbh Mela held every 12 years, Mahakumbh 2025 was a once-in-144-years occurrence due to a rare alignment of the Sun, Moon, and Jupiter. Held at the sacred Triveni Sangam in Prayagraj, where the Ganga, Yamuna, and the mythical Saraswati rivers meet, this event attracted the highest number of religious tourists ever recorded.
Mahakumbh’s scale dwarfed global festivals:
The massive footfall cemented Mahakumbh’s place as the largest religious gathering in human history.
Religious tourism in India is experiencing unprecedented growth:
Mahakumbh 2025 played a major role in this growth, surpassing previous records and driving domestic and international tourism to new heights.
Mahakumbh 2025 wasn’t just a spiritual milestone; it was an economic powerhouse that fueled multiple industries.
To accommodate the massive influx of visitors, major infrastructure upgrades were undertaken:
These enhancements not only improved the Mahakumbh experience but will continue benefiting the region for years.
Mahakumbh significantly boosted employment:
Hospitality, travel, and financial services flourished, further expanding economic opportunities.
Devotees and tourists drove enormous spending:
These transactions reflect the massive economic potential of faith-based tourism.
Mahakumbh 2025 provided a platform for startups and digital innovations that enhanced visitor experiences:
These startups blended technology with tradition, making Mahakumbh more accessible, organized, and efficient.
Mahakumbh 2025 inspired creative entrepreneurs who turned religious tourism into innovative business ideas:
These initiatives showcase how faith-based tourism fuels grassroots innovation and micro-entrepreneurship.
Mahakumbh 2025 attracted global icons, industrialists, and political leaders:
Even cricketer Suresh Raina described Mahakumbh as his “karm bhoomi”, further cementing its cultural impact.
The success of Mahakumbh 2025 marks a turning point for India’s religious tourism industry:
With the next Mahakumbh over a century away, India’s religious tourism sector is poised for long-term expansion, attracting global investments and fostering innovation.
Mahakumbh 2025 was not just a religious event—it was a global spectacle, a booming economy, and a launchpad for startups. It showcased how faith, business, and innovation can co-exist to create a once-in-a-lifetime experience.
For entrepreneurs, investors, and businesses, Mahakumbh 2025 opened doors to limitless possibilities. Whether it’s startups in Mahakumbh, fintech innovations, or tourism ventures, this event has redefined the role of religious tourism in India’s economy.
Concerts aren’t just about music—they’re multi-billion-dollar economic engines that impact multiple industries, from ticketing platforms to tourism, hospitality, taxation, and sustainability.
As Coldplay’s 2025 India tour took the country by storm, we at Treelife took a closer look at the numbers, stakeholders, and economic impact behind this massive event. With revenue numbers, total attendees, and a ripple effect across various sectors, this was more than just a concert—it was a case study in how live events fuel economy and growth.
A concert economy refers to the ripple effect large-scale music events have on multiple industries, including hospitality, transport, food & beverages, merchandise, and other local businesses.
When a global artist like Coldplay performs in India, the financial impact extends far beyond ticket sales. The entire event ecosystem—from airlines and hotels to restaurants, transport, and local businesses—experiences a surge in revenue.
Concerts drive employment, generate tax revenue, and contribute to the growth of industries like ticketing, event management, and streaming platforms. The Indian live events market was valued at ₹88 billion in 2023 and is projected to reach ₹143 billion by 2026, reflecting a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 17.6%. The ticketed live music segment alone is expected to reach ₹1,864 crore ($223 million) in 2025. Music events form a substantial part of this ecosystem, with concert numbers expected to double from 8,000 in 2018 to over 16,700 by 2025.
In essence, a concert isn’t just a musical event—it’s a massive business operation that impacts multiple industries.
Here’s a breakdown of the financial impact Coldplay’s concerts had in India:
Coldplay’s concerts didn’t just impact the fans inside the stadiums—it boosted local businesses, increased hospitality demand, and drove digital engagement across streaming platforms.
A concert of this scale involves multiple stakeholders working together to create a profitable and smooth experience.
From ticketing to brand partnerships, venue revenues to tax collections, the concert economy is an interconnected web of businesses, governments, and event specialists working together.
While concerts bring massive economic benefits, they also come with significant challenges that impact the overall experience for fans, organizers, and businesses. Addressing these barriers is essential for the growth of India’s live music industry.
India’s live concert economy is on the verge of massive expansion, driven by increasing demand, rising disposable incomes, and global interest in music tourism. Here’s what lies ahead:
India’s concert economy is poised to become a global leader, benefiting from strong growth, technological advancements, and an increasing global appetite for music tourism. As the industry evolves, it presents a wealth of opportunities for businesses, brands, and fans alike.
Read our report for more information on how India’s concert economy is evolving and the opportunities it presents for businesses and artists alike.
The Union Budget 2025 presents a reform-driven and growth-focused vision for India’s economic trajectory, aligning with the government’s long-term goal of Viksit Bharat 2047. With a strong emphasis on fiscal prudence, policy continuity, and structural transformation, the budget outlines measures to accelerate infrastructure growth, economic stability, and private sector participation.
India remains one of the fastest-growing major economies, with a real GDP growth forecast of 6.4% for FY 2025 and a fiscal deficit target of 4.4% for FY 2026. The budget’s total expenditure stands at ₹50.65 lakh crore, reflecting a 14% increase, largely focused on investment-led growth.
The government reiterates its commitment to inclusive development for GYAN, centering its initiatives around Garib (poor), Yuva (youth), Annadata (farmers), and Nari (women). The budget also prioritizes MSMEs, exports, energy security, and employment generation, ensuring long-term economic resilience.
The Union Budget 2025 is structured around six core reform domains:
Additionally, the budget introduces sector-specific funds, regulatory overhauls, and incentives for startups and MSMEs to drive innovation and economic growth.
The Union Budget 2025 highlights several major reforms and policy announcements:
A new Income Tax Bill will be introduced to modernize and simplify India’s tax laws, promoting efficiency and predictability in the tax regime.
Budget 2025 brings notable tax reforms aimed at boosting the startup ecosystem and improving business ease. Key highlights include:
Treelife Insight: While these changes improve compliance efficiency, the impact on startup liquidity and cash flow management will be key to watch.
The Budget introduces critical reforms for Alternative Investment Funds (AIFs) and institutional investors, ensuring regulatory clarity and tax stability.
Treelife Insight: These reforms simplify fund structures and reduce compliance friction, making India’s investment ecosystem more competitive.
Personal taxation changes in Budget 2025 focus on increasing exemptions, easing compliance, and rationalizing TDS/TCS:
Treelife Insight: While these changes offer tax relief for middle-income earners, the lack of direct income tax cuts may leave higher-income taxpayers wanting more.
Budget 2025 strengthens GIFT City’s role as a global financial hub with extended tax incentives and new opportunities:
Treelife Insight: These reforms strengthen India’s global positioning in financial services, but long-term success will depend on ease of implementation and market response.
Budget 2025 introduces progressive tax reforms aimed at simplifying compliance, encouraging investment, and driving economic growth. With reforms as the fuel, inclusivity as the guiding spirit, and Viksit Bharat as the destination, the government reaffirms its commitment to policy stability and long-term transformation.
By reducing administrative burdens, improving tax certainty, and fostering a business-friendly environment, these reforms create a strong foundation for India’s evolving economic landscape. While some measures may require further refinements, the overall direction of Budget 2025 marks a positive shift towards a predictable, stable, and globally competitive tax regime.
With the new Income Tax Bill set to be unveiled soon, anticipation is high for further transformative reforms that will shape India’s tax landscape and its emergence as a global economic powerhouse.
The Software as a Service (SaaS) industry is transforming how businesses operate, enabling organizations to scale rapidly, reduce costs, and enhance accessibility. India’s SaaS story is particularly compelling: once a nascent segment, the Indian SaaS market is now projected to reach $50 billion by 2030, contributing significantly to the global market valued at over $200 billion in 2024. The country is home to over 1,500 SaaS companies, several of which have achieved unicorn status, contributing to a market valued at approximately $13 billion in 2023.
In India, the SaaS ecosystem is experiencing an unprecedented boom, becoming a global hub for innovation, entrepreneurship, and investment. Treelife’s SaaS Blueprint: Unlocking India’s Potential with Industry Insights and Regulatory Guide offers a comprehensive exploration of the Indian SaaS landscape, delving into industry growth trends, regulatory frameworks, investment landscape, risk mitigation strategies, and key government initiatives driving the sector. Whether you’re an entrepreneur, investor, or an industry observer, this handbook provides actionable insights and a clear roadmap to navigate the opportunities in this vibrant and fast growing ecosystem.
If you have any questions or need further clarity, please don’t hesitate to reach out to us at garima@treelife.in
The Indian SaaS sector stands at the intersection of global opportunity and local ingenuity, ready to redefine industries with cutting-edge solutions. As businesses embrace technologies like artificial intelligence, blockchain, and machine learning, the potential for innovation and impact is limitless. The SaaS model is projected to surpass $300 billion globally by 2026 – a testament to its scalability and adaptability. From CRM and ERP solutions to AI-driven platforms and industry-specific tools, SaaS caters to diverse business needs. In India, the sector’s growth is equally remarkable, with the market expected to reach $50 billion by 2030. Fueled by affordable cloud infrastructure, a highly skilled workforce, and supportive government policies, the Indian SaaS sector has become a powerhouse of global significance.
However, navigating the complexities of regulation, compliance, and market dynamics is essential for long-term success. With actionable insights and a deep dive into the regulatory framework, this handbook equips businesses and stakeholders to harness the immense potential of SaaS while staying compliant and resilient.
The handbook provides an analysis of the SaaS industry’s evolution, market size, and the role of technology in driving transformation. Key highlights include:
The legal and regulatory landscape for SaaS businesses is complex, with both domestic and international considerations. The handbook covers:
India’s SaaS sector has emerged as an attractive destination for venture capital and private equity investment, with the handbook providing:
The digital nature of SaaS exposes companies to unique risks, including data breaches and operational disruptions. Learn more about strategies to mitigate risk and build resilience through::
Aimed at fostering innovation and promoting adoption of SaaS, the Government of India has launched multiple initiatives and policies, the most prominent of which are below:
Whether you’re an entrepreneur, investor, or policymaker, this handbook provides actionable insights to navigate the opportunities and challenges of the SaaS ecosystem. Key takeaways include:
Download the SaaS Blueprint today and take the next step in shaping the future of SaaS in India. For inquiries or further guidance, reach out to us at garima@treelife.in.
Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) principles have evolved from being a global framework for responsible business practices into a cornerstone of sustainable and ethical growth. In India, the prominence of ESG is rapidly increasing, with the total assets under management (AUM) of ESG funds reaching substantial growth of USD 1.17 billion (INR 9,753 crores) in March 2024. In fact, ESG could represent approximately 34% of the total domestic AUM by 2051.
These principles originated as a response to growing concerns on climate change, social equity, and corporate accountability. Today, they are critical for businesses aiming to align with international sustainability goals. Startups are uniquely positioned to integrate ESG frameworks into their operations from the outset, contributing to global sustainability objectives while enhancing financial performance. Improved risk management, operational efficiencies, and stronger stakeholder trust are among the many benefits of embedding ESG practices. Furthermore, companies with strong ESG performance are increasingly favored by investors, reflecting a global shift toward sustainable financing and prioritizing climate action.
India’s ESG evolution mirrors international trends while addressing domestic opportunities and challenges. Initiatives such as the Business Responsibility and Sustainability Report (BRSR) framework and increasing green finance options have propelled India into the global spotlight. Startups can leverage these developments to scale responsibly, align with India’s international commitments, and position themselves as leaders in the evolving ESG landscape.
Tailored for practical insight, this handbook focuses on individual contributions to ESG as the building blocks for collective progress, enabling startups to align their practices with India’s international commitments and sustainability objectives, and to: (i) scale responsibly; (ii) contribute to global sustainability goals; and (iii) position themselves as leaders in India’s evolving ESG landscape.
This handbook is developed as a comprehensive look into the ESG framework in India covering the evolution of ESG in corporate governance, key components, the Indian regulatory landscape, accounting and reporting standards, and market trends. With case studies on Tata Power, Zomato and IKEA, the handbook also addresses challenges, investment opportunities, and the future of ESG in India. This handbook provides startups with practical strategies to integrate ESG principles into their operations, enabling them to align with India’s global sustainability goals and unlock opportunities for responsible growth. For further guidance or inquiries, reach out to us at garima@treelife.in
India’s Fintech Report 2024-25 by Treelife provides a data-driven analysis of the fintech industry in India, highlighting key trends, growth drivers, and future opportunities. As the fintech market size in India continues to expand rapidly, this report offers a comprehensive view of how fintech companies and fintech startups in India are transforming the financial landscape.
A major highlight of the India Fintech Report 2024-25 is the transformative role of India Stack in shaping the fintech ecosystem. India Stack, a government-backed digital infrastructure, provides a suite of open APIs that enable seamless integration between private companies and government services, paving the way for digital financial inclusion on an unprecedented scale.
India Stack has been a game-changer for fintech companies in India, democratizing access to banking, insurance, lending, and wealth management services. It has supported the rapid expansion of fintech startups in India by reducing barriers to entry, lowering costs, and enabling interoperability across financial services.
The implementation of India Stack has not only increased the fintech market size in India but also boosted financial inclusion, particularly in rural areas where traditional banking access is limited. By facilitating over 63 billion Aadhaar authentications and enabling UPI to process billions of transactions annually, India Stack has become the backbone of India’s digital economy.
The Treelife India Fintech Report 2024-25 covers a wide array of fintech segments that are driving innovation across the financial landscape in India:
Each of these segments plays a pivotal role in the fintech ecosystem, transforming how financial services are delivered and accessed in India.
The India Fintech Report 2024-25 by Treelife is a valuable resource for industry professionals, investors, and policymakers seeking in-depth insights into the growth of fintech in India. Covering all major segments of the fintech market in India, from digital payments to wealth management, the report provides essential data and analysis on the drivers, challenges, and future directions of this rapidly evolving sector.
Get the Treelife India Fintech Report 2024-25 to stay informed about:
Download your copy today to explore the latest trends and stay ahead in the evolving fintech sector in India.
The 2024 U.S. presidential election was a highly anticipated and fiercely contested affair, with the outcome having far-reaching implications globally. As the nation grappled with a range of pressing issues, from the economy and healthcare to climate change and social justice, the political landscape was marked by a clash of ideologies and the continued influence of money and celebrity in the electoral process. Here are 10 fascinating facts about the 2024 US elections:
These 10 fascinating facts from the 2024 U.S. elections provide a glimpse into the complex and dynamic landscape of American politics. As the nation moves forward, the key challenge will be to find ways to bridge the deep partisan divides and address the pressing issues facing the country.
The success or failure of the incoming administration in navigating these challenges will have far-reaching implications for the future of American democracy. The 2024 election has once again demonstrated the resilience and adaptability of the U.S. electoral system, as well as the enduring passions and loyalties that shape the political landscape.
As the nation looks ahead, the 2024 U.S. elections will undoubtedly be remembered as a pivotal moment in the country’s history, one that will continue to shape the course of the nation for years to come. The path forward will require a renewed commitment to bipartisanship, civic engagement and preservation of democratic norms.
As India marches towards its goal of becoming a $5 trillion economy, innovation and global connectivity in finance have become critical components of this journey. At the heart of this transformation lies the Gujarat International Finance Tec-City (GIFT City) India’s first operational International Financial Services Centre (IFSC). Launched in 2007, GIFT City is not just a hub for international finance; it represents India’s vision of becoming a leader in global finance, technology, and innovation. GIFT IFSC provides a comprehensive platform for financial activities, including banking, insurance, capital markets, FinTech, and Fund Management Entities (FMEs). Its attractive tax incentives and solid regulatory framework make it a gateway for both inbound and outbound global investments, drawing businesses and investors from around the world.
At Treelife, we are excited to present “Navigating GIFT City: A Comprehensive Guide to India’s First International Financial Services Centre (IFSC).” This guide offers insights into the current legal, tax, and regulatory framework within GIFT IFSC, highlighting the strategic advantages of establishing a presence here, with a focus on the FinTech and Fund Management sectors. Whether you’re an investor, financial institution, or corporate entity exploring opportunities, we believe this guide will be a valuable resource in navigating the exciting prospects within GIFT IFSC.
GIFT City is positioned as a global hub for financial services, offering a range of services across banking, insurance, capital markets, FinTech, and Fund Management Entities (FMEs). By combining smart infrastructure and a favorable regulatory environment, GIFT City is becoming the go-to destination for businesses seeking ease of doing business, innovation, and access to global markets.
Here are some key takeaways from the guide:
GIFT City is the epitome of India’s ambition to establish a world-class international financial center. The International Financial Services Centres Authority (IFSCA) is the primary regulatory body that oversees operations within GIFT City, ensuring a seamless and globally competitive financial environment. IFSCA’s unified framework offers businesses ease of compliance and flexibility, making it an attractive hub for both domestic and international entities.
Our guide provides an in-depth look at the regulatory landscape governing GIFT City’s key sectors, including banking, insurance, capital markets, and many more, with a special focus on FinTech, and Fund Management Entities (FMEs). Alongside Treelife insights, we highlight how the city’s regulatory framework promotes innovation, offering businesses a fertile ground for growth.
Our guide walks you through the step-by-step setup process for entities looking to establish operations. Whether you are a startup, a financial institution, or a multinational company, guide through GIFT City’s infrastructure and compliance processes.
One of the standout advantages of operating within GIFT City is its favorable tax regime. Businesses enjoy significant tax exemptions, including a 100% tax holiday on profits for 10 out of 15 years, exemptions on GST, and capital gains tax benefits. These incentives are designed to attract global businesses and investors, positioning GIFT City as a competitive alternative to other international financial hubs. Our guide details these tax benefits and how businesses can leverage them for maximum advantage.
Our guide provides a comprehensive overview of the opportunities within GIFT City, focusing on FinTech and Fund Management sectors. It also includes a detailed analysis of the tax incentives, setup processes, and regulatory requirements that make GIFT City an attractive destination for global financial institutions.
Whether you’re an investor looking to tap into India’s expanding economy, or a business exploring new markets, this guide will serve as your roadmap to success within GIFT City.
Discover how GIFT City is shaping the future of finance and how you can be part of this exciting journey. Download our guide to learn more about the opportunities, regulatory framework for the permissible sectors, incentives, and innovations that await in India’s first IFSC.
For any questions or further information, feel free to reach out to us at gift@treelife.in.
As we are witnessing NIFTY 50’s 52-week high, it’s a moment to reflect on the extraordinary journey this index has taken since its inception in 1996. Launched with an index value of 1000, NIFTY 50 has steadily grown, reaching an impressive 25,940.40 by September 2024—marking a growth of approximately 2,494%. This performance solidifies its place as a cornerstone of the Indian stock market.
The NIFTY 50 index, short for National Stock Exchange Fifty, represents the performance of the top 50 companies listed on the NSE. It serves as a key benchmark for mutual funds, facilitates derivatives trading, and is a popular vehicle for index funds and ETFs. Over the last 28 years, it has been a testament to the robustness of the Indian economy, demonstrating the potential of long-term investment in the stock market.
Over the years, NIFTY 50 has outshined other traditional asset classes like gold, silver, and real estate. While these assets have held their value, particularly in times of economic volatility, NIFTY 50 has consistently delivered superior returns.
These figures showcase how NIFTY 50 has not only matched but outpaced traditional safe-haven assets. While gold and silver offer reliability during economic uncertainty, they cannot compete with the compounding returns offered by the stock market.
The sectoral composition of NIFTY 50 has evolved significantly. In 1995, Financial Services contributed just 20% of the index. Fast forward to 2024, and they now dominate with 32.6%. The rise of Information Technology, which was non-existent in 1995, grew to 20% by 2005 but has slightly reduced to 14.17% today. This shift from manufacturing and resource-based sectors to services and technology highlights India’s transformation into a modern, service-driven economy.
NIFTY 50’s journey has not been without challenges. The index has weathered multiple crises, including the Dot-com bubble (2000-2002), Sub-prime crisis (2007-2008), Demonetization (2016), and the COVID-19 pandemic (2020). Despite these hurdles, NIFTY 50 has shown resilience, rebounding stronger each time and proving to be a robust long-term investment option.
As NIFTY 50 celebrates 28 years of excellence, its consistent returns and ability to outperform other asset classes make it a dominant force in India’s financial markets. For investors looking to balance risk and reward, NIFTY 50 remains a reliable choice, reflecting the strength and potential of India’s growing economy.
The Union Budget 2024 marks a significant milestone in India’s economic journey. This Budget underscores the Government’s commitment to maintaining fiscal prudence while driving substantial investments in critical sectors. Despite global economic challenges, the Indian economy has fared well, maintaining stability and growth. For 2024-25, the fiscal deficit is expected to be 4.9% of GDP, with a target to reduce it below 4.5% next year. Inflation remains low and stable, moving towards the 4 percent target, with core inflation (non-food, non-fuel) at 3.1 percent.
The theme of the Budget focuses particularly on employment, skilling, MSMEs, and the middle class. This budget outlines the roadmap to Viksit Bharat 2047 focusing on nine priority areas to generate ample opportunities for all: productivity and resilience in agriculture, employment and skilling, inclusive human resource development and social justice, manufacturing and services, urban development, energy security, infrastructure, innovation and R&D, and next-generation reforms.
The Budget introduces several pivotal reforms aimed at simplifying tax structures, incentivizing investments, and promoting sustainable growth. The abolition of angel tax, reduction in corporate tax rates for foreign companies, and comprehensive review of the Income-tax Act, 1961 in the coming days are expected to bolster the startup ecosystem and attract international investments.
The subsequent sections of this Budget document provide an in-depth analysis and key highlights related to personal taxation, business reforms, investment opportunities, and developments in GIFT-IFSC. Personal taxation changes include revised income tax slabs, increased deductions, and adjustments in Taxes Collected at Source (TCS) and Taxes Deducted at Source (TDS) regulations. Business reforms cover the abolition of the angel tax, reduction in corporate tax rates for foreign companies, and measures to enhance ease of doing business. Investment opportunities are improved through rationalization of the capital gains tax regime, changes in holding periods and tax rates, and amendments related to buyback taxation and Securities Transaction Tax (STT) rates. GIFT-IFSC developments include tax exemptions for Retail Schemes and Exchange Traded Funds (ETFs), removal of surcharges on specified income, and other measures. These sections provide a comprehensive overview of the Union Budget 2024’s measures to support individuals, businesses, and investors, and to enhance India’s position as an attractive destination for global investment and financial activities.
The Union Budget 2024 is a balanced and forward-looking document, reflecting the Government’s resolve to steer the economy towards sustainable growth, innovation, and inclusiveness. This detailed presentation analysis aims to provide a comprehensive analysis of the Budget’’s key highlights, policy changes, and their implications for various sectors of the economy.
|
Key indicators |
Budget 2024-25 |
Budget 2023-24 |
|
Total Receipts (other than borrowings) |
|
INR 27.2 lakh crore |
|
Net Tax Receipts |
|
INR 23.3 lakh crore |
|
Total Expenditure |
|
INR 45 lakh crore |
|
Fiscal Deficit (as % of GDP) |
|
5.90% |
|
Gross Market Borrowings |
|
INR 15.4 lakh crore |
|
Net Market Borrowings |
|
INR 11.8 lakh crore |
Notes: 1. Inflation: Low, stable and moving towards the 4 per cent target, 2. Core inflation (non-food, non-fuel): 3.1 per cent
To drive India’s growth and development, the Union Budget 2024 outlines nine strategic pillars that form the foundation for the nation’s economic agenda, aiming towards Viksit Bharat 2047. These pillars encompass key sectors and initiatives aimed at enhancing productivity, fostering innovation, and ensuring inclusive development. Each pillar is supported by targeted policy measures designed to create opportunities, boost investments, and address critical challenges. The following sections detail these pillars and the corresponding policy initiatives.

The subsequent part of this Budget document is broken down into 4 primary sections providing in-depth tax analysis including:
These sections provide a comprehensive overview of the Union Budget 2024’s measures to support global investment and financial activities.
Proposed changes in personal income tax slabs for individuals (highlighted below) resulting in a tax saving of up to INR 17,500 excluding surcharge and cess under new tax regime.
|
Existing Slabs (INR) |
Proposed Slabs (INR) |
Tax Rate |
|
0-3,00,000 |
0-3,00,000 |
NIL |
|
3,00,001-6,00,000 |
3,00,001-7,00,000 |
5% |
|
6,00,001-9,00,000 |
7,00,001-10,00,000 |
10% |
|
9,00,001-12,00,000 |
10,00,001-12,00,000 |
15% |
|
12,00,001-15,00,000 |
12,00,001-15,00,000 |
20% |
|
>15,00,000 |
>15,00,000 |
30% |
Note : Full tax rebate available for taxable income upto of INR 7,00,000
TCS collected from minors can only be claimed as credit by the parent in whose income the minor’s income is clubbed. This amendment is effective from January 1, 2025.
It is proposed to allow employees to club their TCS and TDS (other than salaries) for the purpose of computing TDS to be deducted from salary.
Treelife Insight:
TCS is usually collected on foreign travel, LRS remittances, purchase of cars beyond a limit. This will help salaried employees effectively manage tax cash flows.
It has been clarified that income from letting out of a residential house to be classified under the heading “Income from house property” and not “business income”.
Penal provisions under section 42 and 43 of the Black Money Act, 2015 proposed to not apply in case of non-reporting of foreign assets (other than immoveable property) with value less than
INR 20,00,000 (increased from earlier threshold of INR 5,00,000).
Quoting of Aadhaar Enrolment ID proposed to be no longer allowed in place of Aadhaar number for ITRs filed after October 1, 2024.
Capital gains tax regime is proposed to be rationalized with effect from July 23, 2024 as summarized below:
Rationalization of Holding Period:
|
Type of Asset |
Period to qualify as Long term |
|
All listed securities |
12 months |
|
All other assets (including immovable property) |
24 months |
Change in Tax Rates:
Long term capital assets
|
Type of Asset |
Residents |
Non-residents | ||
|
Current |
Proposed |
Current |
Proposed | |
|
Listed equity shares and units of equity oriented mutual fund |
10% |
12.5% |
10% |
12.5% |
|
Unlisted equity shares |
20% |
12.5% |
10% |
12.5% |
|
Unlisted debentures and bonds |
20% |
Applicable rates |
10% |
Applicable rates |
|
Units of REITs & InvITs |
10% |
12.5% |
10% |
12.5% |
|
Immovable property |
20% |
12.5% |
20% |
12.5% |
Notes:
Short term capital assets
|
Type of Asset |
Residents |
Non-residents | ||
|
Current |
Propose |
Current |
Proposed | |
|
Listed equity shares and units of equity oriented mutual fund |
15% |
20% |
15% |
20% |
|
Others |
No change – taxable at applicable rates | |||
Treelife Insight:
Mandatory classification of income on sale debentures (including CCDs / NCDs) and bonds as short term capital gains is a big move and could impact the Real Estate investors where such instruments are widely used. It will be interesting to see how such investors will react to this increase in tax rates.
Reduction in tax rates for long term capital gains on unlisted equity shares should give an impetus to PE / VC funds investing in startups as the lower tax rate will ultimately lead to an increase in the IRR for investors.
Reducing the period of holding for immovable properties to 24 months and reducing the long term capital gains tax rate to 12.5% will be looked at positively.
Currently, buyback distribution tax is levied on the company at ~23% on the distributed income. It is proposed to tax the buyback proceeds in the hands of the shareholders as “dividend income” at applicable tax rates. The cost of acquisition of shares being bought back to be claimed as a capital loss (depending on holding period).
This amendment is proposed to be effective from October 1, 2024
Treelife Insight:
This will deter companies from offering buybacks as there is a significant tax outflow for the shareholders under the proposed regime. Further there could be timing mismatch between the claiming of loss and payment of tax on buyback proceeds resulting in cash outflow for the shareholders.
STT rates for futures and options proposed to be increased with effect from to be effective from October 1, 2024:
|
Current |
Proposed | |
|
Options |
0.0625% |
0.1% |
|
Futures |
0.0125% |
0.02% |
Angel tax i.e. section 56(2)(viib) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 proposed to be abolished with effect from April 01, 2024
Treelife Insight:
Tax rates for foreign companies proposed to be reduced from 40% to 35%.
It is clarified that taxes withheld outside India are to be included for the purposes of calculating total income.
|
Existing Structure |
Allowable Remuneration |
Proposed |
Allowable Remuneration |
|
on the first INR 3,00,000 of the book profit or in case of a loss |
INR 1,50,000 or at the rate of 90 % of the book profit, whichever is more |
on the first |
INR 3,00,000 or at the rate of 90 % of the book profit, whichever is more |
|
on the balance of the book-profit |
60% |
on the balance of the book-profit |
60% |
Section 194-IA (TDS on sale of immovable property) – Proposed to add a proviso to clarify that the threshold limit of INR 50 lakhs is to be checked on the total value of the property and not on amount paid to each individual seller (with effect from October 1, 2024).
Excluding sums paid under section 194J from section 194C (Payments to Contractors) –Earlier, taxpayers used to deduct TDS under section 194C even if the payment was liable to TDS under section 194J because there was no specific mutually exclusive clause while defining the word “work”. It is proposed to amend the definition of “work” under section 194C to specifically exclude any sum referred to in section 194J (with effect from October 1, 2024)
|
Section |
Old rates |
Proposed new rates |
|
Section 194D – Payment of insurance commission (in case of resident person other than company) |
5% |
2% (with effect from April 1, 2025) |
|
Section 194DA – Payment in respect of life insurance policy |
5% |
2% (with effect from October 1, 2024) |
|
Section 194G – Commission etc on sale of lottery tickets |
5% |
2% (with effect from October 1, 2024) |
|
Section 194H – Payment of commission or brokerage |
5% |
2% (with effect from October 1, 2024) |
|
Section 194-IB – Payment of rent by certain individuals or HUF |
5% |
2% (with effect from October 1, 2024) |
|
Section 194M – Payment of certain sums by certain individuals or Hindu undivided family |
5% |
2% (with effect from October 1, 2024) |
|
Section 194-O – Payment of certain sums by e-commerce operator to e-commerce participant |
1% |
0.1% (with effect from October 1, 2024) |
|
Section 194F – Payments on account of repurchase of units by Mutual Fund or Unit Trust of India |
20% |
Proposed to be omitted (with effect from October 1, 2024) |
|
New Section 194T – Payment of salary, remuneration, interest, bonus or commission by partnership firm to partners |
NA |
10% on various payments made to partners – salary, remuneration, interest, bonus or commission (with effect from April 1, 2025) |
|
New Section 193 – Interest paid exceeding on Floating Rate Savings (Taxable) Bonds (FRSB) 2020 with effect from October 1, 2024 |
NA |
10% (threshold – exceeding INR 10,000) (with effect from October 1, 2024) |
|
Section 206(7) – Interest on late payment of TCS |
1% per month or part of the month |
1.5% per month or part of the month (with effect from April 1, 2025) |
Proposed to amend the definition of ‘Specified Fund’ under Section 10(4D) to include Retail Schemes and ETFs launched in GIFT-IFSC thereby extending the beneficial tax regime applicable for CAT III AIFs to GIFT-IFSC to Retail Schemes and ETFs
Treelife Insight:
Relevant only for Inbound Funds setup by pooling money from non-resident investors as the condition that units (other than Sponsor / Manager units) to be held by non-resident investors continues to apply.
Surcharge rate on interest and dividend income proposed to be removed for Specified Fund set-up in GIFT-IFSC even if setup as other than Trust
Section 68 dealing with unexplained cash credits allows the tax officer to seek an explanation to provide the source of its funds used for making investment / offer loans to companies subject to these provisions. It is proposed to amend the definition of ‘venture capital funds’ to include VCFs in GIFT-IFSC thereby exempting them from questioning by the tax officer under section 68.
Exemption from ‘Thin Capitalisation’ norms prescribed under section 94B for Bank and NBFCs extended to Finance Companies in GIFT-IFSC
Proposed to amend the definition of ‘recognised clearing corporations’ under Section 10(23EE) to include ‘recognised clearing corporations’ setup in GIFT-IFSC, thereby, exempting any specified income of Core Settlement Guarantee Fund, set up by such corporations.
]]>The “Navigating Labour Laws: A Comprehensive Regulatory Guide for Startups” by Treelife offers a comprehensive overview of India’s intricate labour law landscape, emphasising the significance of these compliances for startups. Rooted in the fundamental rights (specifically, the Rights to Equality; to Freedom; and against Exploitation) and the directive principles of state policy (contained in Articles 38, 39, 41, 42, and 43) enshrined in the Indian Constitution, labour laws in India are fundamentally welfare legislations, imposing significant compliance responsibility on employers as a result of a socialist outlook seeking to protect the dignity of human labour.
Given the dual role played by central and state governments in labour law, startups are oftentimes unaware of applicable compliances or are under-equipped to navigate the complex framework, lacking the deep technical understanding required. It is this gap in understanding that this Regulatory Guide attempts to bridge, with the major highlight being a quick reference guide for startups to identify critical compliances at both levels of governance.
Other key highlights include:
The Labour Law Handbook by Treelife is an essential guide for businesses navigating India’s complex labour law framework. Tailored for startups and growth-focused enterprises, this report simplifies intricate compliance requirements, offering actionable insights into central and state-specific regulations, statutory obligations, and upcoming labour code reforms. With detailed explanations of critical laws, practical compliance checklists, and expert recommendations, this handbook empowers businesses to mitigate legal risks, ensure workforce welfare, and operate confidently in a dynamic regulatory environment.
]]>The Indian space sector is currently undergoing a significant transformation, driven by increased private sector participation and substantial government support. With over 523 private companies and research institutions now actively contributing, India’s space economy is projected to reach $44 billion by 2033, capturing nearly 10% of the global market. This manual aims to provide comprehensive insights into the industry overview, investment landscape, legal considerations, tax incentives, and intellectual property rights essential for stakeholders in the space tech ecosystem.
The government has allocated nearly $1.6 billion for the Department of Space (DoS), which oversees the Indian Space Research Organisation (ISRO) and other space-related activities. Since 2014, there has been a notable increase in private investments, particularly in satellite manufacturing and launch services, amounting to $233 million across more than 30 deals by July 2023.
The Indian spacetech ecosystem comprises a mix of public and private entities working collaboratively to advance the country’s space capabilities. Key activities include:
India’s space sector operates under a comprehensive legal and regulatory framework designed to promote innovation and facilitate private sector participation.

Key regulatory bodies and agencies include:
The existing FDI policy allows up to 100% foreign investment in satellite establishment and operation through the government route. Proposed amendments aim to further liberalize the sector, but gaps and ambiguities remain, particularly regarding compliance with sectoral guidelines and definitions of key terms.
To encourage private participation, several tax measures have been implemented, including GST exemptions for satellite launch services and income tax exemptions for R&D expenditures. Key government schemes supporting the sector include:
GIFT City (Gujarat International Finance Tec-City) provides a favorable regulatory environment, cutting-edge infrastructure, and a robust ecosystem for space tech companies. It facilitates funding, international collaboration, and regulatory support, making it an ideal gateway for scaling operations and innovation.
The Indian space tech sector is poised for significant growth, driven by increased FDI, public-private partnerships, advanced technologies, and upcoming incentives. The development of reusable launch vehicles and the Gaganyaan mission, slated for 2025, are set to showcase India’s capabilities and bolster its position in the global space community.
India’s space technology sector is at a pivotal moment, characterized by unprecedented growth, innovation, and collaboration. This report serves as a comprehensive guide for industry players, investors, policymakers, and legal professionals navigating the landscape of India’s space tech ecosystem. The combined efforts of public and private entities are driving the sector’s ascent, positioning India as a major player in the global space economy.
]]>Shark Tank India, the Indian adaptation of the globally renowned business reality show, has taken the nation by storm. Since its debut in December 2021, the show has become a hot topic for entrepreneurs, investors, and viewers alike. But has it truly lived up to the hype?
The show boasts a panel of cutthroat investors (Sharks) like Ashneer Grover, Namita Thapar, Peyush Bansal, Aman Gupta, and Vineeta Singh, all business tycoons (Sharks) in their own right. The high-stakes environment and candid deal negotiations (pitches) have captivated audiences, with each season witnessing a surge in venture capitalist (VC) activity and startup funding. Data suggests that over INR 100 crore was invested across the first two seasons, propelling many innovative direct-to-consumer (D2C) brands and social enterprises into the limelight.
However, Shark Tank India has also faced its share of criticism. Some argue that the emotional appeals employed by contestants overshadow the business fundamentals. Others point out that securing a deal on the show doesn’t guarantee long-term success. While many funded startups have witnessed a post-show funding boost, a significant number haven’t been able to translate the television exposure into sustainable growth.
Despite the debate, Shark Tank India undeniably democratized entrepreneurship in India. It has ignited a startup revolution, inspiring millions to chase their business dreams. Whether it’s a funding platform or simply a launchpad for publicity, Shark Tank India has undoubtedly disrupted the entrepreneurial landscape in the country.
]]>Power Play: A Regulatory Guide for Indian Gaming Companies
India’s gaming industry is on the brink of a monumental transformation, evolving from a budding market to a global leader. With over 500 gaming studios now operational, the country is at the forefront of innovation and creativity in the gaming world. The country boasts a substantial gaming community, comprising 568 million gamers, out of which 25% are paying users. Industry analysts predict a future even brighter, forecasting the Indian gaming industry to surpass $3.9 billion by 2025. This phenomenal growth signals a golden era for aspiring entrepreneurs and gaming enthusiasts.
The Indian Gaming Industry: A Snapshot of Facts
As India’s gaming industry navigates through a phase of exponential growth and regulatory evolution, several key facts highlight its current status and forecast its future trajectory.
Diving Into the Ecosystem
At the heart of this revolution are game developers, gaming platforms, esports ventures, RMG (Real Money Gaming) companies, and blockchain gaming innovators. Each segment contributes uniquely to the vibrancy and diversity of India’s gaming landscape.
Navigating Success in India’s Gaming Industry
To thrive in this booming ecosystem, understanding the legal and regulatory frameworks is crucial. The distinction between “games of skill” and “games of chance” forms the legal cornerstone. Moreover, the implementation of the Information Technology (Intermediary Guidelines and Digital Media Ethics Code) Amendment Rules 2023 marks a pivotal shift, introducing a regulatory framework tailored for online gaming companies.
Innovation at the Forefront
Protecting innovation is paramount in the competitive gaming industry. Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) serve as the foundation for safeguarding game developers’ creativity and originality, covering everything from trademarks and copyrights to patents and designs. This protective measure ensures companies can maintain their competitive edge and continue to push the boundaries of creativity.
The Road Ahead
Despite facing regulatory challenges and the intricacies of GST and taxation, India’s gaming industry stands on the precipice of a new dawn. The sector’s ability to navigate these hurdles while harnessing its vast potential will shape its trajectory in the years to come. With the promise of increased FDI, job creation, and continued technological innovation, the future of gaming in India shines brightly.
Explore the Full Report
For those looking to dive deeper into the intricacies and opportunities within India’s gaming industry, our comprehensive report, “Power Play: A Regulatory Guide for Indian Gaming Companies” offers an invaluable resource on investment landscape, market size and opportunity, landmark happenings, legal and regulatory framework, compliance essentials and IPR, taxation and anticipated developments. The report equips readers with the knowledge needed to navigate entrepreneurs and enthusiasts in India’s vibrant gaming ecosystem.
]]>
]]>
Regulators position – primary breach of S 42 (Issue of Shares on Private Placement basis) of CA, 2013
Extract of S 42(7) of the CA, 2013: “(7) No company issuing securities under this section shall release any public advertisements or utilize any media, marketing or distribution channels or agents to inform the public at large about such an issue.”
“S 42 of the Act clearly provides that the private placement shall be made to a select group of persons who have been identified by the Board. The number of such persons cannot exceed 200 (prescribed in the rules). The Explanation I. to S 42(3) makes it very clear that the process of “private placement” covers:
• the offer or
• invitation to subscribe or
• issue of
securities to a select group of persons by a company (other than by way of public offer) through private placement offer-cum-application, which satisfies the conditions specified in the section.
”In summary – the concept of the term ‘private placement’ stands for the fact that the company is identifying a certain set of parties to whom it wants to offer its securities rather than making any kind of public offer which generally happens in the case of listed companies. Private is construed as 200 people.
TYKE + Company’s position
“Tyke provides value added services in the form of facilitation of connecting like-minded people. Community with start-ups. Tyke also provides the verification of KYC, identification of KYC of people who have shown interest to invest in the company.”
“The Companies have only availed the value added services (VAS) which is provided by the Tyke platform.”
In summary – Tyke calls itself like a ‘community of like minded people and startups’ where the startup is leveraging on the community to raise investments and TYKE acts as a facilitator for the investment once the proposed investor and startup agree.
Our thoughts!
In the era of Shark Tank, every individual aspires to be a ‘shark’ and wants to participate in the startup ecosystem and ride the wave. TYKE serves as a great platform to provide access to both startups and retail investors for raising money and to invest money in startups respectively. In the USA, for example, this is considered as a high risk asset class and hence there are restrictions on the annual investment amount for regular investors other than ‘accredited investor’. Keeping this in mind, in the current scenario, despite all the explanations given by Tyke and the Company, the regulator primarily points out to the intent of the law where private placement (fundraise) cannot be published in open markets to solicit any investments through communities, etc
]]>