Notification

  • Not Able to Find What You’re Looking For? Speak to us directly! Our experts are here to guide you through any queries or challenges.

    Speak to Us

Liquidation Preference in Venture Capital Deals

Get in touch with us

    Your information is confidential and secure

    Quick Summary

    In venture capital agreements, liquidation preference clauses are pivotal in determining the payout hierarchy during a company’s exit events, such as mergers or acquisitions. These provisions ensure that preferred shareholders receive their initial investment, often with a specified return, before common shareholders participate in any remaining proceeds. The structure of liquidation preferences can vary, with common types including:

    • Non-Participating Preference: Investors choose between reclaiming their investment (possibly with a multiple) or converting their preferred shares into common stock to share in the residual distribution.
    • Participating Preference: Investors first recover their investment and then also share in the remaining proceeds alongside common shareholders, potentially leading to a more substantial return.

    Understanding these mechanisms is crucial for both investors and founders, as they significantly influence the financial outcomes during liquidation events.

    What is Liquidation Preference?

    A Liquidation Preference provision sets out the level of priority that an investors’ shares receive for the purpose of recovering their initial investment (or a multiple thereof) upon trigger of a liquidation event. A liquidation event typically includes winding up, sale of substantial assets of a company, change of control, merger, acquisition, reorganization and other corporate transactions, among others.

    How Liquidation Preference Helps an Investor?

    1Recovery of InitialA liquidation preference allows the investors to recover at least their initial investment in a company.
    2Multiple on the Initial InvestmentA liquidation preference provision also allows the investors to earn a multiple on their initial investment, i.e., instead of 1x, investors may seek 2x or more, if so agreed.
    3Distribution in order of seniorityA liquidation preference clause allows the distribution of the proceeds to be in an order of priority on the basis of the series of securities held by the investors.

    .

    Types and Mechanics of Liquidation Preference

    Types of Liquidation Preference

    Type of LPParticulars
    Non-participating Liquidation Preference
    1xAllows the investors to recover only their initial investment in the company.
    1x or pro-rata, whichever is higher* (single dip)Allows the investors to recover their initial investment or entitles them to the proceeds from the liquidation event, basis their pro-rata shareholding in the company (on an as-if converted basis), whichever is higher.
    Participating Liquidation Preference
    1x (double-dip)Allows the investor to recover their initial investment (or a multiple thereof) in addition to a right to participate in the remaining proceeds basis their pro-rata shareholding in the company.

    *Note:The multiple on the liquidation preference may be more than 1x and the amount of distribution of the liquidation preference shall be determined basis such a multiple.

    Let us understand the mechanism of different types of liquidation preference through the below illustration:

    Investment AmountINR 10cr
    Percentage shareholding in the Company10%

    .

    Scenario 1: Non-participating liquidation preference

    1x or pro rata, whichever is higher

    Total Liquidation proceeds*Investors’ liquidation entitlement (2x)Investors’ liquidation entitlement (pro-rata)Actual entitlement
    INR 20crINR 10crINR 2crINR 10cr.
    INR 200crINR 10crINR 20crINR 20cr.

    *Note: The total liquidation proceeds are the total proceeds from a liquidation event which are subject to distribution between the shareholders.

    2x or pro rata, whichever is higher

    Total Liquidation proceeds*Investors’ liquidation entitlement (2x)Investors’ liquidation entitlement (pro-rata)Actual entitlement
    INR 20crINR 20crINR 2crINR 20cr.
    INR 400crINR 20crINR 40crINR 40cr.

    .

    This form of liquidation preference is most desirable as, while it allows the investors to recover their initial investment, it also enables them to take advantage of the upside in case the larger proceeds are accumulated from a liquidation event.

    It is however, not recommend signing up for a multiple on the investment amount.

    Scenario 2: 1x (participating liquidation preference)

    Total Liquidation proceeds*Investors’ liquidation entitlement (1x)Investors’ liquidation entitlement (pro-rata)Actual Entitlement
    INR 20crINR 10crINR 2crINR 12cr
    INR 500crINR 10crINR 50crINR 60cr.

    .

    While this may seem like a desirable form of liquidation preference, in the event the structure of a liquidation is not pari passu, i.e., in case the liquidation clause provides for a seniority, this may lead to disadvantage to the holders of equity shares (in most cases, the founders).

    Conclusion

    In conclusion, while liquidation preference is a crucial right for the investors, it is important for the founders to be mindful about the construct of this provision.

    Early stage founders are recommended to consider the 1x non-participating liquidation preference, preferably provided in Scenario 1. Excessive or stringent liquidation preferences can deter future investment rounds and put the founders at risk of reduced share in the liquidation proceeds.

    About the Author
    Garima Mitra
    Garima Mitra
    Co-founder | garima@treelife.in

    Spearheads Transactions, Contracts, and Compliance verticals. Combines expertise in business law and a passion for social impact to shape the legal and financial ecosystem for startups.

    Nikita Sukhathankar
    Nikita Sukhathankar
    Senior Associate | Transactions | nikita.s@treelife.in

    Brings deep expertise in transactions, regulatory compliance, and corporate law. Specializes in venture capital, private equity, and complex deal structuring, helping startups navigate financial and legal frameworks with ease.

    Koustubh Athavale
    Koustubh Athavale
    Senior Associate | Legal | koustubh.a@treelife.in

    Provides expertise in commercial contracts, dispute resolution, and data privacy. Leverages extensive experience in the startup ecosystem to deliver tailored legal solutions for diverse business needs.

    We Are Problem Solvers. And Take Accountability.

    Related Posts

    Conversion of Partnership Firm to LLP – Step by Step Process
    Conversion of Partnership Firm to LLP – Step by Step Process

    For many entrepreneurs in India, a partnership firm serves as the foundational legal structure for their business ventures. However, as...

    Learn MoreLearn More
    Memorandum of Association – MoA Clauses, Format & Types
    Memorandum of Association – MoA Clauses, Format & Types

    The Memorandum of Association (MOA) is one of the most essential documents in the company incorporation process, forming the foundation...

    Learn MoreLearn More
    POSH Compliance Checklist in India – Complete Guide
    POSH Compliance Checklist in India – Complete Guide

    The POSH Act, formally known as the Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act, 2013, is...

    Learn MoreLearn More

    For Customer Support

    Mumbai | Delhi |
    Bangalore | GIFT City

    Speak to Us!

    We respond within 60 minutes.

      Your information is confidential and secure

      For Customer Support

      Mumbai | Delhi |
      Bangalore | GIFT City

      Fill out the form to unlock the full report!

      Image