Notification

  • Image

    Webinar | Angel Investing in India: Mistakes First-Time Investors Avoid

    Book your seat

New Amendment: A Step Towards Making Social Media Intermediaries More Accountable

Get in touch with us

    Your information is confidential and secure


    AI Summary
    • MeitY notified amendments to the Information Technology (Intermediary Guidelines and Digital Media Ethics Code) Rules, 2021 on 28 October 2022.
    • The amendments followed a draft proposal circulated in June 2022 that invited stakeholder comments and generated significant debate on social media regulation in India.
    • The amendments introduce one or more Grievance Appellate Committees (GACs), each comprising a chairperson and two whole-time members, one of whom is a government official.
    • Users aggrieved by a grievance officer's order can appeal to the GAC within 30 days, and the GAC must endeavour to resolve such appeals within 30 days of receipt.
    • Before this amendment, the only recourse against a grievance officer's decision was to approach the High Courts or the Supreme Court.
    • The GAC is required to conduct its entire dispute resolution process online, from filing of the appeal to the final decision.
    • Social media intermediaries must now publish their rules, regulations, privacy policy, and user agreement in all regional languages, not just English.
    • Intermediaries have a new obligation to ensure users actually comply with platform rules, not merely inform them of such rules.
    • Intermediaries must now address any complaint regarding removal of content within 72 hours, and the amendments do not expressly empower the GAC to enforce its own decisions.

    Get in touch with us

      Your information is confidential and secure


      On October 28, 2022, the Ministry of Electronics and IT (“MeitY”) notified amendments to the Information Technology (Intermediary Guidelines and Digital Media Ethics Code) Rules, 2021 (“IT Rules”), categorically sending a warning to the social media intermediaries (“SMI”). This move comes five months after MeitY, in the month of June, proposed a draft of the aforementioned amendments and invited comments from the stakeholders, which garnered considerable reactions and discussions surrounding the regulation of social media in India.

      The amendments to the IT Rules provide a boost to MeitY’s objective to make internet a safe place for its users while imposing accountability on SMI.

      The amendments aim at inter alia improving the efficacy of the grievance redressal mechanism provided for in the IT Rules by providing for the establishment of appellate bodies, and proposing certain changes in the grievance redressal mechanism. Furthermore, there was a need felt to ensure better compliance by SMI of the IT Rules. In this light, we have highlighted in brief, the key amendments to the IT Rules below:

      1. Introduction of Grievance Appellate Committee

      Prior to the present amendment, the IT Rules prescribed appointment of grievance officers (“GCs”) by all SMI, to dispose of the complaints made by the users expeditiously and the only recourse available to users / stakeholders against the order of the grievance order was to contest the same before the High Courts or Supreme Court.

      To remedy the concerns of social media platform users, the amendments have envisaged establishment of one or more Grievance Appellate Committee(s) (“GAC”), each composed of a three-person panel appointment by the government. The GAC would comprise a chairperson and 2 whole time members, of which one would be a government official and the others would be autonomous representatives.

      Aggrieved users of social media platforms, would have the opportunity to, within 30 days, appeal against orders of the GCs to the GAC and the GAC shall make endeavours to resolve such appeals within 30 days from the date of receipt of such appeal. Furthermore, the GAC has been commissioned to adopt an online mode for the process of resolution of disputes, from the stage of filing an application, till decision thereof.

      While establishment of GACs is a remarkable step towards strengthening the grievance redressal framework in the SMI world, the amendments fall short in conferring express powers to the GAC, in the enforcement of its decisions.

      • Obligations of SMIs

      Previously, SMI were responsible to intimate its users of their rules, regulations, privacy policy and user agreement and the categories of content which they are prohibited from sharing or uploading on platforms.

      The amendments require SMI to make available these rules, regulations, privacy policy and user agreement in all regional languages. In addition, SMI now have the additional obligation to ensure that their users abide by the rules of the platform. This has considerably increased the responsibility of SMIs to supervise and regulate content on their websites and has attracted mixed reactions from both, the social media platforms and its users.

      Furthermore, according to the amendment, SMI must now address any complaint regarding removal of content from a platform, within 72 hours.

      About the Author
      Garima Mitra
      Garima Mitra social-linkedin
      Co-founder | garima@treelife.in

      Spearheads Transactions, Contracts, and Compliance verticals. Combines expertise in business law and a passion for social impact to shape the legal and financial ecosystem for startups.

      Koustubh Athavale
      Koustubh Athavale social-linkedin
      Senior Associate | Legal | koustubh.a@treelife.in

      Provides expertise in commercial contracts, dispute resolution, and data privacy. Leverages extensive experience in the startup ecosystem to deliver tailored legal solutions for diverse business needs.

      Pooja Savla
      Pooja Savla social-linkedin
      Principal Associate | Transactions | pooja.s@treelife.in

      Specializes in transaction advisory, including mergers and acquisitions, investment structuring, and corporate legal matters. Combines a strong background in law and finance to drive seamless transactions and business growth.

      We Are Problem Solvers. And Take Accountability.

      Related Posts

      Data Fiduciary vs Data Processor: Redrafting Your B2B Vendor DPAs Under the DPDP Act 2023
      Data Fiduciary vs Data Processor: Redrafting Your B2B Vendor DPAs Under the DPDP Act 2023

      Most Indian B2B contracts signed before 2024 were not written with the Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023 in mind....

      Learn MoreLearn More
      Who Owns the Prompt? Modifying Employee IP Assignment Clauses for the GenAI Era
      Who Owns the Prompt? Modifying Employee IP Assignment Clauses for the GenAI Era

      Most Indian employment agreements assign to the employer everything an employee creates, develops, or invents during employment. That clause was...

      Learn MoreLearn More
      The AI Indemnity Trap: Negotiating Liability When Third-Party Algorithms Hallucinate
      The AI Indemnity Trap: Negotiating Liability When Third-Party Algorithms Hallucinate

      Every founder who has embedded a third-party AI model into their product has read an indemnity clause that sounds reassuring....

      Learn MoreLearn More

      For Customer Support

      Mumbai | Delhi |
      Bangalore | GIFT City

      Speak to Us!

      We respond within 60 minutes.

        Your information is confidential and secure


        Let's talk.

        We've seen most founder problems before. Tell us yours.






          Typically responds within 4 hours
          Or reach out directly