Singapore Company Incorporation from India: A Step by Step Guide

Setting up a Singapore Pte Ltd from India is not a single filing. It is two regulatory processes running on parallel tracks, one in Singapore under the Accounting and Corporate Regulatory Authority (ACRA) and one in India under the Foreign Exchange Management Act (FEMA), 1999, that have to be sequenced correctly for the money to move and the company to exist at the same time. Founders who treat these as separate tasks usually end up with a Singapore entity that cannot receive funds, or a remitted sum sitting with the authorised dealer bank waiting for a UEN that has not been issued. This guide sets out the full sequence, the documents each side needs, the compliance obligations that start the day the company is incorporated, and the mistakes that show up most often in Treelife’s incorporation engagements.

Can an Indian citizen or Indian company incorporate a company in Singapore?

Yes. Singapore permits 100% foreign ownership of a Private Limited Company (Pte Ltd) with no requirement for the shareholder to be a Singapore citizen, permanent resident, or resident individual. The company must still appoint at least one director ordinarily resident in Singapore. Indian founders satisfy this either by relocating a director on a work pass or by appointing a nominee director through a registered Corporate Service Provider (CSP), since Indian nationals without a Singpass credential cannot self-file on ACRA’s BizFile+ portal.

Choosing the right entity structure before you file

Indian founders expanding to Singapore generally choose between three structures, and the choice determines which ACRA form is filed and which FEMA route applies on the Indian side.

A Private Limited Company (Pte Ltd) is the default choice for a founder-led business, a holding company above an Indian operating entity, or a regional sales and delivery arm. It is a separate legal person under the Singapore Companies Act (Cap. 50), carries limited liability, and is eligible for the Start-Up Tax Exemption scheme administered by the Inland Revenue Authority of Singapore (IRAS). A branch office extends the Indian company’s own legal personality into Singapore, which means Indian liabilities are not ring-fenced and the branch cannot claim the Start-Up Tax Exemption. A representative office cannot invoice, sign contracts, or generate revenue at all. It exists only for market research and liaison, and it has a fixed lifespan before it must convert to a Pte Ltd or wind up.

For nearly every Indian founder reading this, the Pte Ltd is the correct answer, and the rest of this guide assumes that structure.

StructureLegal personalityLiabilityCan trade or invoiceTax exemption eligibility
Private Limited Company (Pte Ltd)Separate from parentLimited to paid-up capitalYesEligible for Start-Up Tax Exemption
Branch officeExtension of Indian parentParent liableYesNot eligible
Representative officeNo separate entityNot applicableNoNot applicable

The complete setup in Singapore sequence, step by step

Before drilling into the Singapore filing mechanics and the FEMA mechanics separately, here is the combined sequence in the order Indian founders actually execute it. Each step is expanded in its own section further below; this is the master checklist that ties both tracks together.

  1. Decide the FEMA route. Individual founder using the LRS, or an Indian company/LLP using ODI. This decision has to come first, since it determines which documents you start collecting on the Indian side. (See “FEMA compliance” below.)
  2. Engage a Singapore filing agent and an Indian FEMA advisor in parallel, not sequentially. Waiting for one side to finish before starting the other is the single biggest avoidable delay in this process.
  3. Reserve the company name and decide the SSIC code. Submit two or three name alternatives through the filing agent. (See “Step by step: the ACRA incorporation process” below.)
  4. Prepare the FEMA-side paperwork in parallel: board resolution (ODI route) or LRS declaration (individual route), and the net worth certificate if using ODI. (See “Documents checklist” below.)
  5. Incorporate the Pte Ltd with nominal paid-up capital, typically SGD 1, to obtain the UEN quickly rather than waiting to remit the full intended capital first.
  6. File Form FC with the AD bank against the now-existing UEN and obtain the UIN. (See “FEMA compliance” below.)
  7. Remit the funds and increase paid-up capital in Singapore through a follow-on share allotment.
  8. Open the Singapore corporate bank account, submitting the CSP’s introduction alongside the company’s own KYC documents. This is usually the longest single step. (See “Opening a Singapore corporate bank account” below.)
  9. Complete the day-one Singapore registers: the nominee register (if applicable) and the Register of Registrable Controllers, both due at incorporation for companies formed on or after 16 June 2025.
  10. Hand over to the ongoing compliance calendar on both sides: Singapore’s corporate tax registration, GST assessment, AGM/annual return cycle, and audit-exemption tracking; India’s APR by 31 December and, if relevant, transfer pricing documentation. (See “Post-incorporation compliance in Singapore” and “Post-incorporation compliance in India” below.)

The week-by-week timeline further below maps roughly how long each of these ten steps takes in practice.

Step by step: the ACRA incorporation process

1. Engage a registered filing agent. Indian nationals do not hold a Singpass linked to an NRIC or FIN, which is the login credential BizFile+ requires. This means the company name reservation and the incorporation filing itself must go through a Singapore-registered filing agent or Corporate Service Provider, not directly by the founder. Choosing this agent is the first real decision in the process, since the same agent typically also arranges the nominee director and the registered office address.

2. Reserve the company name. The filing agent submits the proposed name through BizFile+. ACRA checks it against existing registrations and restricted or sensitive word lists. The fee is S$15 and, once approved, the reservation holds for 120 days. Founders should submit two or three alternatives, since a name identical or confusingly similar to an existing Singapore entity is rejected outright. Certain words trigger a referral to a separate authority before ACRA will approve the name: “bank”, “finance”, or “trust” routes through the Monetary Authority of Singapore, “school” or “academy” routes through the Ministry of Education, and “insurance” or “assurance” attracts MAS scrutiny as well. Most Indian founders naming a straightforward SaaS, trading, or services company never hit this, but a fintech or edtech name should budget an extra one to two weeks for the referral round trip.

3. Decide the SSIC code. Every Singapore company declares a primary business activity under the Singapore Standard Industrial Classification (SSIC). This code affects which licences apply later and how banks classify the company for onboarding. A software or SaaS business typically registers under 62011 (development of software) or 62012 (computer consultancy), an e-commerce business under 47912 (retail sale via internet), and a holding or management structure under 70209 (management consultancy services). A generic or mismatched SSIC code is a common source of friction at the bank account stage, covered further below.

4. Prepare the constitution and statutory particulars. The company’s constitution sets out share rights, transfer restrictions, and director powers. Alongside it, the filing agent lodges particulars of shareholders, directors, and the company secretary, along with the registered office address, which must be a physical Singapore address and cannot be a P.O. box. Singapore abolished the concept of authorised share capital and par value shares in 2006, so there is no “authorised capital” figure to declare and no par value attaching to each share; the company simply issues a stated number of shares for a stated total consideration, which is why SGD 1 in paid-up capital is a genuinely valid starting position rather than a placeholder against some higher authorised limit.

5. File the incorporation application. The agent submits the full application on BizFile+ along with the ACRA registration fee of S$300. Combined with the S$15 name reservation, the total statutory government cost is S$315. On approval, ACRA issues the Unique Entity Number (UEN), which functions as the company’s registration number, tax reference, and the identifier the bank, IRAS, and Singapore government agencies will use going forward.

6. Receive the notice of incorporation. For companies incorporated on or after 16 June 2025, nominee director and nominee shareholder information must be filed with ACRA’s Central Register at the point of incorporation itself, not as a later compliance step (Companies and Limited Liability Partnerships (Miscellaneous Amendments) Act 2024). This is a structural change from the pre-2025 regime, where nominee registers were kept privately.

Government processing for a straightforward application is typically one to three working days once documents are complete. The variable that actually determines the timeline is document readiness on the Indian side: notarised or apostilled identity documents, and the FEMA remittance discussed in the next section, both routinely add more time than the ACRA filing itself.

StepWho actsGovernment feeTypical time
Name reservationFiling agent, via BizFile+S$15Same day to 1 working day
Incorporation filingFiling agent, via BizFile+S$3001 to 3 working days
Nominee register filingFiling agentIncluded in CSP feeAt incorporation
Bank account openingFounder, with CSP supportBank dependent2 to 6 weeks

Documents checklist: what your CSP and AD bank will each ask for

The Singapore side and the India side of this process ask for different documents at different points, and gathering them in parallel rather than sequentially is the single biggest lever founders have over the total timeline.

For the Singapore filing agent, expect to provide, for every director and shareholder:

  • Passport copy, notarised where the CSP’s bank partner requires it
  • Proof of residential address dated within the last three months (utility bill or bank statement)
  • A brief CV or LinkedIn profile, since banks increasingly ask for this at the account-opening stage even though ACRA does not require it for incorporation
  • For a corporate shareholder (an Indian company investing via ODI), the certificate of incorporation, board resolution authorising the investment, and the constitutional documents of the Indian entity, each apostilled or notarised depending on the receiving bank’s policy

For the AD bank processing Form FC, expect to provide:

  • Board resolution of the Indian entity approving the overseas investment, specifying amount, jurisdiction and purpose (for company investors) or a simple declaration of intent (for individual LRS remitters)
  • Net worth certificate from a chartered accountant, based on the last audited balance sheet, for ODI route investors
  • Form A2 and the LRS declaration, for individual investors
  • KYC documents already on file with the bank, refreshed if outdated
  • Once the Singapore entity exists, its certificate of incorporation and Business Profile extract, to complete the Form FC filing itself

Apostillation is worth flagging separately: India is a signatory to the Hague Apostille Convention, so documents executed in India for use in Singapore (also a signatory) need an apostille from the Ministry of External Affairs rather than embassy legalisation, which is faster but still routinely adds one to two weeks if the founder has not done this before.

Nominee director, company secretary and the June 2025 disclosure rule

Every Singapore Pte Ltd needs at least one director who is ordinarily resident in Singapore, meaning a citizen, permanent resident, or an eligible work pass holder (Singapore Companies Act, Section 145). Founders who are not relocating appoint a nominee director through a registered CSP to satisfy this requirement.

A nominee director signs statutory forms and satisfies the residency condition, and does not have operating control, banking authority, or a say in commercial decisions. That separation should be documented in a nominee agreement, since it is what protects the founder’s decision-making authority in practice, not the label “nominee” itself.

Two rule changes from 2025 matter for anyone appointing one:

  • From 16 June 2025, companies must maintain a Register of Nominee Directors and Nominee Shareholders and file that information with ACRA’s Central Register. The nominee status itself becomes publicly visible on the company’s BizFile+ profile, though the identity of the person who appointed the nominee stays restricted to law enforcement access.
  • From 9 June 2025, arranging a nominee director “by way of business” must run through a CSP registered with ACRA. An individual arranging nominee appointments outside a registered CSP faces fines of up to S$10,000.

A separate register is easy to confuse with the nominee register but answers a different question: the Register of Registrable Controllers (RORC), required since 31 March 2017 under the Companies Act. Where the nominee register records who is standing in as director, the RORC records who actually owns or controls the company, defined as anyone holding more than 25% of shares or voting rights, or otherwise exercising significant influence over the company, regardless of whether that person is Indian, Singaporean, or based anywhere else. For a straightforward Indian-founder-owned Pte Ltd, the Indian founder is almost always the registrable controller. The private register must be set up on the day of incorporation for companies formed on or after 16 June 2025, and any change must be lodged with ACRA’s central RORC within two business days. Failing to maintain or lodge it is a criminal offence under the Companies Act, with a maximum fine of S$25,000, and this obligation sits independently of whether the company also has a nominee director.

A company secretary must be appointed within six months of incorporation and must be a Singapore resident. The secretary manages the statutory register, annual return filings, and board resolution formalities, and is typically provided by the same CSP handling incorporation.

Nominee director or relocate on a work pass: which satisfies the residency requirement?

A nominee director is the faster route and the one most Indian founders start with, since it needs no personal relocation and no visa approval timeline. The alternative is for the founder to become the resident director themselves by relocating on an Employment Pass, evaluated under the Ministry of Manpower’s points-based COMPASS framework, which requires a score of at least 40 points across salary, qualifications and workforce factors, with a minimum fixed monthly salary that scales by age. Founders running an early-stage, venture-backed business sometimes use the EntrePass instead, which sidesteps COMPASS and has no minimum salary requirement, but which comes with its own bar: the founder must hold at least 30% of the company’s shares, play an active day-to-day role as director rather than a passive shareholder, and the company, if already incorporated, must be less than six months old at the time of application. On top of those base conditions, the applicant must satisfy at least one innovation criterion, most commonly having raised at least S$100,000 from a recognised venture capital fund or angel investor, holding registered intellectual property that is not easily replicated, or being an active participant in a recognised incubator or accelerator programme. Self-funding or a friends-and-family round typically does not qualify. Neither work pass route is fast enough to unblock an incorporation that is waiting on a resident director today, which is why the nominee director remains the default for the incorporation step itself, with a founder’s own relocation planned as a separate, parallel track if it is part of the longer-term structure.

FEMA compliance: choosing your route before you remit a dollar

This is the step Indian founders get wrong most often, because it happens on the India side while the Singapore side is moving in parallel, and the two routes available carry different limits, different forms, and different eligible investors.

Route 1: Liberalised Remittance Scheme (LRS), for a resident individual. An individual founder can remit up to USD 250,000 per financial year under the LRS to fund the Singapore company’s paid-up share capital, provided the Singapore entity is engaged in a bona fide operating business and is not in the financial services sector. This is the route most solo or co-founder teams use to capitalise a fresh Pte Ltd before it has any Indian operating history.

Route 2: Overseas Direct Investment (ODI), for an Indian company or LLP. Where the investor is an existing Indian company, LLP, or registered partnership, not an individual, the applicable framework is the Foreign Exchange Management (Overseas Investment) Rules, 2022. Under the automatic route, an Indian entity can make a financial commitment (equity, compulsorily convertible instruments, and guarantees combined) of up to 400% of its net worth as per the last audited balance sheet, without prior RBI approval, provided the target sector is not restricted. Net worth of a subsidiary or holding company can no longer be borrowed for this calculation, a change introduced by the 2022 rules; only the investing entity’s own net worth counts.

Both routes converge on the same pre-remittance filing. The Reserve Bank’s own Master Direction on Overseas Investment and the underlying Foreign Exchange Management (Overseas Investment) Regulations, 2022 refer to this as Form FC, submitted through an Authorised Dealer (AD) Category I bank to the RBI’s Overseas Investment (OID) application, which generates the Unique Identification Number (UIN) before the money leaves India. A large share of advisory content still calls this filing “Form ODI-Part I”, a carryover from the pre-2022 regime, and readers will see both names used interchangeably; they refer to the same filing under the current rules. The AD bank typically takes two to five working days to process the UIN once documents are in order, and this step commonly adds two to four weeks to the overall timeline once the Indian entity’s paperwork, board resolution, and net worth certificate are accounted for. The mechanics of the ODI framework itself, including the approval route triggers and the flip structure variant, are covered in full in our guide to setting up an offshore subsidiary from India; what follows here is specific to how that framework interacts with a Singapore incorporation in progress.

FeatureLRS (individual founder)ODI (Indian company/LLP)
Eligible investorResident individualCompany, LLP, registered partnership
Annual/aggregate limitUSD 250,000 per financial year400% of net worth (automatic route)
Governing frameworkRBI LRS Master DirectionFEMA (Overseas Investment) Rules, 2022
Pre-remittance filingForm A2, LRS declarationForm FC via AD bank, UIN required
Post-investment filingNot applicableAnnual Performance Report (APR), due 31 December
Restricted sectorsFinancial services excludedReal estate, gambling, and other notified sectors excluded

A practical sequencing point that trips up even well-advised teams: the AD bank generally will not process Form FC until the foreign entity exists, since the form requires details of the incorporated company, yet the Singapore bank frequently wants to see evidence of the capital remittance before releasing the account. The workaround CSPs and AD banks have settled on is incorporating the Pte Ltd with a nominal paid-up capital first (as low as SGD 1), completing the Indian FEMA filing and remittance against the now-existing UEN, and then increasing paid-up capital through a follow-on allotment once funds land in the Singapore account. Founders who insist on remitting the full intended capital in one shot before incorporation exists are the ones who end up with funds stuck in a holding pattern at the AD bank.

Opening a Singapore corporate bank account

Banks in Singapore apply their own anti-money laundering diligence on top of the ACRA registration, and this is usually the longest single step in the whole process for an Indian promoter group, commonly two to six weeks.

Expect the bank to ask for:

  • Certificate of incorporation and the company’s Business Profile from BizFile+
  • Constitution and register of directors and shareholders
  • Passport and proof of address for every director and shareholder holding 25% or more
  • A description of the business consistent with the SSIC code declared at incorporation
  • Source of funds documentation, particularly where the initial capital originates from an Indian remittance

A mismatch between the SSIC code and the business description supplied to the bank is one of the more common reasons account opening stalls, since compliance teams flag the inconsistency and ask for clarification before proceeding. Several digital banks and payment institutions now offer faster onboarding for straightforward SaaS or trading businesses, and CSPs typically maintain relationships with two or three banks they route founders to based on the business profile.

Post-incorporation compliance in Singapore

Once the UEN is issued, a fixed compliance calendar starts regardless of whether the company has started trading.

  • Corporate tax registration. IRAS automatically registers the company for corporate income tax on incorporation. The headline rate is 17%, but the Start-Up Tax Exemption (SUTE) shelters 75% of the first S$100,000 of chargeable income and 50% of the next S$100,000, for each of the first three consecutive Years of Assessment, provided the company meets shareholding and activity conditions. For Year of Assessment 2026, IRAS initially set a Corporate Income Tax Rebate of 40% of tax payable, capped at S$30,000, then enhanced it on 7 April 2026 to 50% of tax payable, with the total benefit (rebate plus cash grant) capped at S$40,000. Confirm the applicable rate against the current IRAS notice before relying on it, since further mid-year revisions are not unusual.

A worked example makes the SUTE mechanics concrete. A Singapore Pte Ltd with S$150,000 in chargeable income in its first Year of Assessment would have 75% of the first S$100,000 exempt (S$75,000 exempt) and 50% of the remaining S$50,000 exempt (S$25,000 exempt), leaving S$50,000 taxable at 17%, or S$8,500 in gross tax. The enhanced YA2026 rebate then cuts that by 50%, to S$4,250, an effective rate of under 3% on the company’s full S$150,000 of chargeable income in that first year. This exemption applies only for the first three consecutive Years of Assessment and only while the company meets SUTE’s shareholding conditions, so the effective rate rises once that window closes.

  • GST registration becomes mandatory once taxable turnover crosses S$1 million in a 12-month period, and is optional below that threshold. Where the Singapore entity invoices customers in India, or the Indian parent pays the Singapore entity for services, that cross-border flow is also a related-party transaction under Indian transfer pricing law: documentation under Rule 10D becomes mandatory once aggregate international transactions with the group exceed ₹1 crore in a financial year (Section 92D, Income Tax Act, 1961), and a fuller Master File is triggered separately if the consolidated group’s global revenue exceeds ₹500 crore and its Indian international transactions exceed ₹50 crore (Rule 10DA). Most first-year Singapore subsidiaries will cross the ₹1 crore Local File threshold well before they approach Master File territory, so budget for basic transfer pricing documentation from year one rather than treating it as a later-stage problem.
  • First Annual General Meeting (AGM) and annual return. Under the Companies Act, a private company must hold its AGM within six months of its financial year end (FYE), unless it qualifies for the exemption by sending financial statements to members within five months of FYE instead. The Annual Return must then be filed with ACRA via BizFile+ within seven months of FYE if an AGM was held, or five months if the company used the exemption route. A company’s first FYE must fall within 18 months of incorporation, and late filing attracts a penalty of S$300 if filed within three months of the due date, rising to S$600 beyond that. Since January 2026, ACRA has also removed the informal grace period some companies relied on around the deadline, so the six-month and seven-month figures are now enforced to the day.
  • Statutory audit exemption. Most newly incorporated Pte Ltd companies never need an external audit in their early years. Under Section 205C of the Companies Act, a private company qualifies as a “small company”, and is exempt from audit, if it meets at least two of three thresholds, revenue of S$10 million or less, total assets of S$10 million or less, and 50 employees or fewer, for the immediately preceding two consecutive financial years (or the current financial year alone if newly incorporated). No application to ACRA is required; the exemption is automatic once the criteria are met, though the company must still prepare financial statements and file its annual return. ACRA opened a review of these thresholds in 2026, so founders sitting close to the S$10 million mark should watch for revised figures rather than assume the current limits hold indefinitely.
  • Register of Registrable Controllers. As set out above, this sits alongside, not instead of, any nominee register the company maintains, and it must be set up on the day of incorporation rather than added later.
  • Employment Pass or work pass filings, if any director or employee is relocating to Singapore, sit with the Ministry of Manpower and run on a separate timeline from ACRA and IRAS.

How much does it cost to incorporate a Pte Ltd from India, all in?

Government fees alone are S$315. On top of that, a filing agent, nominee director, registered office and first-year company secretary support add a further cost that varies by provider and by how much diligence and paperwork the founder’s own profile requires. Treat any flat number you see quoted online as indicative only, and get a written quote from your chosen filing agent before budgeting, since bank account onboarding fees and any FEMA advisory cost on the Indian side sit outside this figure entirely.

Timeline: a realistic week-by-week schedule

The ACRA filing itself is fast. What actually stretches the calendar is the Indian-side paperwork and the bank, so a founder planning around “incorporation takes one to three days” alone will consistently miss their own internal deadline. A more realistic schedule for a founder starting from scratch, with no documents yet apostilled and no CSP yet engaged, looks like this:

WeekWhat happens
1Engage a Singapore filing agent and, in parallel, brief an Indian FEMA advisor. Decide LRS versus ODI route. Begin apostillation of Indian-side documents.
2Name reservation filed and approved. Constitution and SSIC code finalised. Board resolution (if ODI route) drafted and passed.
3Incorporation filed and UEN issued, with nominal paid-up capital. Nominee director and registered office in place. Net worth certificate (if ODI route) finalised by the Indian entity’s chartered accountant.
4 to 5Form FC filed with the AD bank against the now-existing UEN. AD bank processes and issues the UIN, typically two to five working days once the file is complete.
5 to 6Remittance made. Paid-up capital increased through a follow-on allotment in Singapore. Bank account application submitted with the CSP’s introduction.
6 to 10Bank completes its own KYC and AML diligence. This step alone can run two to six weeks and is the most common point where a founder’s internal timeline slips.
10 to 12Account operational. GST registration assessed against the S$1 million threshold. First-year accounting and company secretarial support handed over for the ongoing compliance calendar.

Founders with documents already apostilled, an existing net worth certificate, and a straightforward SSIC code routinely compress this to five to six weeks. Founders starting from zero on the Indian paperwork should budget closer to twelve.

Post-incorporation compliance in India

Incorporation in Singapore does not close the Indian compliance loop. Three obligations follow, and missing them is where founders most often end up facing penalties, not at the incorporation stage itself.

Annual Performance Report (APR). Every Indian entity that has made an ODI must file an APR for each foreign entity, every year, on a calendar year basis, by 31 December, regardless of whether any further investment was made that year. This is a frequently missed deadline precisely because it does not track the Indian financial year ending 31 March, and it applies even to companies that funded their Singapore subsidiary through the LRS route under FEMA’s broader reporting framework, not only pure ODI cases.

Late Submission Fee (LSF), not a fresh contravention. Where a filing is late but the underlying investment was otherwise compliant, the 2022 rules route it through a Late Submission Fee rather than compounding, calculated broadly as a flat amount plus a percentage of the transaction value per year of delay for transactional filings, and a flat fee per return for periodic filings such as the APR. Missing Form FC filing altogether, as opposed to filing it late, remains a contravention under Section 13 of FEMA, 1999, carrying penalties of up to three times the amount involved.

Place of Effective Control and Management (POEM). Under Section 6(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, a foreign company is treated as tax resident in India, and taxed on its worldwide income in India, if its POEM is in India. Where every director of the Singapore Pte Ltd sits in Mumbai or Bengaluru, holds all board meetings over video call from India, and takes every material commercial decision without ever convening in Singapore, the company risks being treated as an Indian tax resident despite its ACRA registration, per the CBDT’s guiding principles on POEM (Circular No. 6 of 2017). Founders relying on the India-Singapore Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement for tax efficiency should note that treaty benefit and residency status are separate questions, and a POEM finding undermines the entire structure regardless of treaty terms. Readers weighing Singapore against UAE, the US, or the UK on tax and treaty grounds will find that comparison, including the 2016 DTAA amendment and its grandfathering provisions, in our detailed guide to choosing a foreign subsidiary jurisdiction.

FilingDue dateApplies toConsequence of missing it
Form FCBefore remittanceODI route investorsContravention under FEMA Section 13
Annual Performance Report31 December, every yearAll ODI investors, per foreign entityLate Submission Fee; can block future ODI
Annual Return on Foreign Liabilities and AssetsAnnually (RBI notified date)Indian entities with ODIReporting non-compliance
Singapore AGM and annual returnStatutory window post financial year endAll Pte Ltd companiesACRA penalties, striking off risk

Common mistakes that cost founders time and money

Remitting full capital before the Singapore entity exists. The AD bank cannot complete Form FC processing against a company that has no UEN yet. Incorporate with nominal capital first, file FC against the UEN, then increase paid-up capital.

Treating the LRS and ODI routes as interchangeable. An Indian company cannot use the individual USD 250,000 LRS limit to fund a subsidiary; it must go through ODI and the 400% net worth test. Conflating the two at the planning stage means restructuring the funding after incorporation has already happened.

Missing the 31 December APR deadline because the team is tracking the Indian financial year. The APR runs on a calendar year regardless of the Indian entity’s own accounting year end, and this mismatch is the single most common ODI contravention RBI compounding orders flag.

Choosing a vague SSIC code at incorporation. A generic code creates friction later at the licensing and bank onboarding stage, when the declared activity does not match what the business actually does.

Ignoring POEM by running the Singapore company entirely from India. A nominee director satisfies ACRA’s residency requirement, but does not, by itself, establish that commercial decisions are actually being made in Singapore. Genuine board deliberation and documented decision-making in Singapore is what protects the structure from an Indian tax residency finding, not the nominee appointment alone.

Treating the Register of Registrable Controllers as optional or forgetting it entirely. It is a separate legal requirement from the nominee register, applies from the day of incorporation, and carries a fine of up to S$25,000 for non-compliance. Founders who focus all their attention on the nominee director paperwork sometimes miss that the RORC needs setting up on day one, not whenever the CSP gets around to it.

Assuming “AGM within six months” gives more breathing room than it does. Since ACRA removed its informal grace period in January 2026, the six-month AGM deadline and seven-month annual return deadline are enforced to the day, and a December financial year end means a 30 June AGM cutoff and a 31 July filing cutoff, both of which land in a period when finance teams are often stretched thin.

Frequently asked questions

Q: Do I need RBI approval to set up a Singapore company from India?
A: Not usually. If the investment fits within the automatic route, meaning it does not exceed 400% of the Indian entity’s net worth (for company investors) or the USD 250,000 LRS limit (for individual investors), and the target sector is not restricted, no prior RBI approval is required. You still must file Form FC and obtain a UIN before remitting.

Q: How long does it take to incorporate a Singapore Pte Ltd from India, start to finish?
A: The ACRA filing itself is one to three working days once documents are ready. The realistic end-to-end timeline, including FEMA Form FC processing and bank account opening, is typically four to eight weeks.

Q: What is the minimum share capital for a Singapore Pte Ltd?
A: SGD 1. Most founders incorporate with a nominal amount and increase paid-up capital through a follow-on allotment once the FEMA remittance clears.

Q: Can I be the sole director of my Singapore company if I live in India?
A: No. At least one director must be ordinarily resident in Singapore. If you are not relocating, you need a nominee director through a registered Corporate Service Provider in addition to yourself as a director.

Q: What happens if I miss the Annual Performance Report deadline?
A: A Late Submission Fee applies, calculated as a flat amount per return, rather than a fresh contravention, provided the original investment was compliant. Repeated or prolonged non-filing can block RBI approval for any future overseas investment by the same Indian entity until the backlog is regularised.

Q: Can my Indian company hold shares in the Singapore entity, or does it have to be in my personal name?
A: Either is possible, but the route differs. A resident individual uses the LRS, subject to the USD 250,000 annual limit. An Indian company or LLP uses the ODI route under the FEMA (Overseas Investment) Rules, 2022, subject to the 400% net worth limit, and this route carries the additional APR filing obligation the individual route under LRS reporting does not carry in the same form.

Q: Is the Singapore company eligible for India’s Startup India or DPIIT recognition?
A: No. DPIIT recognition under Startup India applies only to entities incorporated in India under the Companies Act, 2013 or the LLP Act, 2008. A Singapore Pte Ltd is a foreign entity and sits outside that scheme entirely, even where it is a subsidiary of a DPIIT-recognised Indian company.

Q: Can my spouse or a family member be a co-shareholder in the Singapore company?
A: Yes, there is no restriction on family co-ownership under Singapore company law. On the Indian side, if the spouse is also remitting funds under their own LRS limit, each individual’s remittance is tracked separately against their own USD 250,000 annual ceiling.

Q: Does a Singapore holding company still get the India-Singapore tax treaty benefit?
A: Treaty benefit depends on the nature of the income and the entity’s own substance and residency, not simply on incorporation location. The 2016 amendment to the India-Singapore DTAA removed the capital gains exemption for investments made after 1 April 2017, with earlier investments grandfathered. This is a separate question from the FEMA and ACRA process covered here.

Q: What if my Singapore company’s board is entirely made up of India-based directors?
A: This creates a Place of Effective Control and Management (POEM) risk under Section 6(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. If decisions are genuinely made in India rather than Singapore, the company can be treated as an Indian tax resident despite its Singapore incorporation, regardless of what the ACRA register shows.

Q: Can Singapore employees be granted ESOPs by an Indian parent company, or does the Singapore entity need its own ESOP scheme?
A: Either structure is workable, but each carries separate tax and securities law treatment in both jurisdictions. This needs to be structured at the same time as the incorporation, not added afterward, since retrofitting an ESOP pool onto an already-issued cap table is more disruptive than planning for it upfront.

Q: What if I decide not to proceed after reserving the company name?
A: An unused name reservation simply lapses after 120 days with no further consequence. If FEMA remittance has already occurred against a Form FC filing before the decision to abandon is made, the funds need to be formally repatriated and reported, which is a separate filing from the original outward remittance.

Q: Does an NRI founder go through the same LRS process as a resident Indian founder?
A: No. LRS applies to resident individuals. A Non-Resident Indian is not subject to the same FEMA outward remittance restrictions in the same way, since NRI status changes the applicable framework. This distinction is worth confirming with an advisor before assuming either route by default.

Q: Does my Singapore company need its accounts audited every year?
A: Not necessarily. If the company meets at least two of three thresholds, revenue up to S$10 million, assets up to S$10 million, and 50 or fewer employees, for the past two consecutive financial years, it qualifies as a “small company” under Section 205C of the Companies Act and is automatically exempt from statutory audit. Most first-time Indian founders comfortably fall within this exemption in their opening years.

Q: Is “Form FC” the same as “Form ODI-Part I”?
A: Yes, in effect. The Foreign Exchange Management (Overseas Investment) Regulations, 2022 and RBI’s current Master Direction refer to the pre-remittance filing as Form FC. A lot of advisory material, including older Treelife content on the broader ODI framework, still uses “Form ODI-Part I”, a name carried over from the pre-2022 regime. Both describe the same pre-investment filing through the AD bank.

Q: What is the Register of Registrable Controllers, and is it the same as the nominee register?
A: No, they answer different questions. The nominee register records who is standing in as a director or shareholder on your behalf. The Register of Registrable Controllers (RORC) records who actually owns or controls the company, defined as anyone holding more than 25% of shares or voting rights, and it applies whether or not the company uses a nominee at all. Both need to be maintained, and both are ACRA requirements with separate penalties for non-compliance.

Q: I want to relocate to Singapore myself. Should I use an EntrePass instead of a nominee director and an Employment Pass later?
A: Only if your business genuinely meets one of the EntrePass innovation criteria, such as at least S$100,000 raised from a recognised venture capital fund or angel investor, registered intellectual property, or active participation in a recognised incubator or accelerator. The EntrePass also requires you to hold at least 30% of the company’s shares and take an active operating role, and if the company is already incorporated it must be less than six months old at the time you apply. Founders who do not clearly meet one of these criteria are usually better served by incorporating with a nominee director first and pursuing an Employment Pass once the business has trading history and can support a compliant salary.

Q: Why does Singapore have no “authorised share capital” figure like an Indian private limited company does?
A: Singapore abolished the concept of authorised share capital and par value shares in 2006. A Singapore Pte Ltd simply issues a stated number of shares for a stated total consideration, with no ceiling to raise separately before issuing more shares. This is a genuine legal difference from the Companies Act, 2013 framework in India, not just a difference in market practice.

Q: At what transaction value do I need formal transfer pricing documentation for payments between my Indian company and the Singapore entity?
A: Once the aggregate value of international transactions between the two exceeds ₹1 crore in a financial year, documentation under Rule 10D becomes mandatory (Section 92D, Income Tax Act, 1961). A separate, more extensive Master File obligation applies only to much larger groups, where consolidated global revenue exceeds ₹500 crore and Indian international transactions exceed ₹50 crore. Most first-year Singapore subsidiaries invoicing or being invoiced by their Indian parent will cross the ₹1 crore threshold quickly, so this is worth planning for from the first year of operation rather than waiting for the group to reach a larger scale.

Q: How do I know if my planned Singapore business activity is a restricted sector under FEMA?
A: The FEMA (Overseas Investment) Rules, 2022 list specific excluded sectors, including real estate business and certain gambling-related activities, and impose additional conditions on strategic sectors such as energy. A straightforward SaaS, trading, or services business is not typically restricted, but sector classification should be confirmed against the current rules before filing, not assumed from a competitor’s structure.

Regulatory references:

  • Singapore Companies Act (Cap. 50), Section 145, on resident director requirement
  • Singapore Companies Act (Cap. 50), Section 205C, on small company audit exemption
  • Singapore Companies Act (Cap. 50), on the Register of Registrable Controllers, effective 31 March 2017
  • Singapore Companies Act (Cap. 50), Sections 175, 175A and 197, on AGM and annual return deadlines
  • Companies (Amendment) Act 2005 (Singapore), abolishing par value and authorised share capital, effective 30 January 2006
  • Companies and Limited Liability Partnerships (Miscellaneous Amendments) Act 2024, effective 16 June 2025
  • Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999, Section 13, on penalties for contravention

Delaware Entity Setup for Indian Businesses & Startups: Complete Guide

Setting up a Delaware C Corporation is often the first structural decision an Indian founder faces when chasing US venture capital or scaling into American markets. The Delaware piece is, in practice, the simpler half. The India side of the transaction is where most of the compliance risk sits: the Foreign Exchange Management Act (FEMA) 1999 filings, the two separate RBI reporting obligations (the Annual Performance Report and the Foreign Liabilities and Assets Return), transfer pricing documentation under the Income-tax Act 2025, and the inbound FDI compliance when the Delaware entity eventually invests back into its Indian subsidiary. Get the Delaware paperwork wrong and you face a USD 25,000 IRS penalty. Get the India paperwork wrong and you face FEMA compounding, restrictions on all future overseas investments, and an open-ended income tax audit exposure. This guide covers both sides in full.

Why Delaware? The honest answer for Indian founders

Delaware is not the only US state you can incorporate in. It is the state that US venture capital firms and institutional lawyers have standardised around for over four decades, which means the legal precedents, term sheet templates, SAFE agreements, and preferred stock mechanics your investors will use are all designed around Delaware’s General Corporation Law (DGCL). Delaware’s Court of Chancery is a specialised business court with no jury, and disputes are resolved faster and more predictably than in general state courts. Over 68% of Fortune 500 companies and the vast majority of US VC-backed startups are incorporated in Delaware (Delaware Division of Corporations data, 2026).

For Indian founders, the practical reasons to choose Delaware are three. First, if a US VC is leading your round, their standard investment documents (Series A Preferred Stock Purchase Agreement, Voting Agreement, Investors’ Rights Agreement) are drafted for a Delaware C Corp. Asking them to modify for a different structure costs time and legal fees. Second, leading US accelerator programmes require Delaware C Corp status for participation. Third, Delaware franchise tax is calculated on authorised shares or assets, not on profits earned outside Delaware, which means a startup with no US revenue does not trigger a large Delaware state tax bill in its early years.

Delaware matters less if you are building a bootstrapped business with no plans for US institutional funding, if your only US business is a sales subsidiary rather than a parent holding entity, or if your investors are exclusively India or Singapore-based funds comfortable with an Indian holding company. Structure the decision around your capital plan, not around what other founders did.

When a Singapore Pte Ltd makes more sense

A common framework used by India-based advisors is: start with a Singapore Pte Ltd as the operating entity for Asia-Pacific customers and operational efficiency, then layer a Delaware C Corp above it as a holding entity when a US VC round is imminent. Singapore offers a 17% corporate tax rate, GDPR-compatible data regime, and neutral jurisdiction recognition across Asia. If you are not raising from a US VC in the next 12 to 18 months, this two-entity approach often makes more operational sense than a Delaware entity sitting dormant. The trade-off is a more complex three-layer structure: Indian entity, Singapore entity, Delaware entity, which triggers the two-layer cap under the OI Rules 2022 and requires careful planning before execution.

Delaware C Corp vs LLC: why the C Corp is the right choice for fundraising

The short answer: a Delaware LLC is structurally incompatible with institutional venture investment.

A Delaware C Corporation can issue multiple classes of shares: common stock for founders and employees, and preferred stock for investors with liquidation preferences, anti-dilution rights, and board seats. SAFEs and convertible notes, the standard early-stage instruments, convert into preferred stock in a C Corp. LLCs cannot issue preferred stock in the same form and do not support these instruments without complex restructuring.

LLCs also use pass-through taxation, meaning profits flow through to the individual owners and are taxed at their personal tax rates. For an Indian founder who is a tax resident of India, this creates a compliance problem: US LLC income taxable in the US on a pass-through basis, with complex foreign tax credit reconciliation in India. A C Corp pays US federal corporate tax at 21% on its US-sourced profits at the entity level. Indian founders receive dividends or salary, not pass-through income, which is a cleaner structure from an India income tax perspective.

Delaware C Corp vs LLC comparison

FeatureDelaware C CorpDelaware LLC
Preferred stock for VCYes (standard)Not in standard form
SAFE / convertible noteYesStructurally complex
Pass-through taxationNoYes (problematic for Indian founders)
ESOPs for employeesYes (standard scheme)Difficult, rarely used
US federal corporate tax21% at entity levelPass-through to owners
Annual franchise taxUSD 400 minimum (Assumed Par Value method)USD 300 flat
VC investor familiarityVery highLow for institutional VC
Suitability for Indian VC-backed startupsYesNo

For a consultant or service business with US clients and no institutional fundraising plans, a Delaware LLC or Wyoming LLC provides simpler setup and lower annual maintenance costs. It is not appropriate for VC-backed startups.

How to incorporate a Delaware C Corp: step-by-step

Step 1: Decide your share structure before filing

Most VC-backed startups authorise 10 million shares at a par value of USD 0.0001 per share. Delaware’s filing fee is partly a function of authorised shares, and a higher share count means a higher initial filing fee, reaching USD 1,000 or more for 10 million shares. Founders typically receive common stock. Future investors receive preferred stock. An ESOP pool of 10 to 15% of fully diluted shares is reserved at formation.

The decision on share count and ESOP pool size should be made before filing, not after. It is expensive to amend the Certificate of Incorporation.

Step 2: File the Certificate of Incorporation

The Certificate of Incorporation is filed with the Delaware Division of Corporations. It specifies the company name, registered agent’s address in Delaware, authorised shares, and par value. Standard filing takes 1 to 7 business days. State filing fees range from USD 89 for standard processing to USD 1,089 for immediate same-day service. Indian founders do not need to be physically present in the US to incorporate.

Incorporation service comparison

ServiceOne-time costLegal docsBank accountCross-border focusForm 5472 as ongoing service
Self-service platform AUSD 500Template-basedFintech bank partnershipModerateNo
Legal-document-focused platformUSD 799Attorney-reviewedNo (guides only)LowNo
India-US cross-border platformUSD 999Template-basedAssistanceStrong (India-US)Yes (USD 100/form)
Low-cost platformUSD 297-597Template-basedYesModerateAdd-on
Traditional registered agent serviceUSD 379+Basic templatesNoLowNo

Pricing from platform websites as of March 2026. State filing fees (USD 89 to USD 1,089 depending on processing speed) are additional for all services. Attorney-reviewed documents justify the premium for founders raising a priced VC round within 12 months, as they are designed to survive investor due diligence. For ongoing India-US cross-border compliance, confirm whether your chosen service bundles Form 5472 filing as a standard offering or charges separately.

Step 3: Apply for an EIN

The Employer Identification Number (EIN) is the US tax identification number for the corporation, equivalent to India’s PAN. Indian founders apply using IRS Form SS-4 without a US Social Security Number, by fax or mail. EIN processing for foreign founders takes 4 to 6 weeks. Without an EIN, you cannot open a US bank account or enter into most commercial contracts.

Step 4: Open a US bank account

Several US fintech banks allow account opening for non-resident founders with no US address or Social Security Number requirement. You need the Certificate of Incorporation, EIN confirmation letter, and a valid passport. The bank conducts KYC checks on all beneficial owners. Some Indian founders experience delays at AML screening for India-incorporated parent entities. Having your FEMA compliance documentation ready before the bank application speeds up approval.

Step 5: Issue founder shares and file the 83(b) election

Immediately after incorporation, founders receive their shares. If shares vest over time (standard four-year vesting with a one-year cliff), the 83(b) election must be filed with the IRS within 30 days of the share grant date. This election locks in the cost basis of restricted stock at the time of grant, when the value is effectively zero, rather than deferring recognition to each vest event. The practical result is that most future share appreciation is taxed at long-term capital gains rates rather than ordinary income rates when shares are eventually sold.

Missing the 30-day window is irreversible. There is no late filing provision. Founders who miss it face potentially large ordinary income tax bills in the US as shares vest and appreciate. This is the single most time-critical step after incorporation and, unlike most other compliance items, cannot be remedied after the deadline passes.

FinCEN BOI update: what changed in March 2025

A common point of confusion for Indian-founded Delaware entities is the Beneficial Ownership Information (BOI) reporting requirement under the Corporate Transparency Act (CTA). The rule changed materially in March 2025 and the current position is straightforward.

On 26 March 2025, FinCEN published an interim final rule that exempted all entities created under the laws of a US state, including Delaware C Corps and LLCs, from the BOI reporting requirement. A Delaware C Corp formed by Indian founders is a domestic US entity and is therefore exempt from CTA reporting regardless of who owns it.

The BOI obligation now applies only to foreign entities that have registered to do business in a US state. If your structure includes a Cayman, BVI, or Mauritius holding company that has registered as a foreign entity to do business in Delaware, that foreign entity must file a BOI report with FinCEN within 30 days of registration. It reports only non-US persons as beneficial owners.

Practical implication: if your structure is simply Indian founders owning a Delaware C Corp directly (or through an Indian entity via ODI), there is no FinCEN BOI obligation on the Delaware entity as of 2026. Verify the current FinCEN position directly at fincen.gov/boi before filing or skipping a BOI report, as the rules changed in March 2025.

The India-side FEMA framework: what changes once you set up the Delaware entity

What triggers ODI and why it applies

Once an Indian company or Indian individual makes an investment in a foreign entity (by subscribing to shares, providing a loan, or issuing a guarantee), that transaction is classified as Overseas Direct Investment (ODI) under the Foreign Exchange Management (Overseas Investment) Rules, 2022 (“OI Rules 2022”), notified on 22 August 2022. The OI Rules 2022 replaced the older FEMA 120/2004 framework and introduced a consolidated framework covering ODI (investments above 10% of foreign entity’s equity) and Overseas Portfolio Investment or OPI (up to 10%).

For the typical Indian startup setting up a Delaware parent entity, the Indian company or its Indian founders are making an ODI into the Delaware C Corp. This triggers mandatory reporting and compliance obligations.

The 400% net worth cap

The total financial commitment, covering equity investment, loans extended, and guarantees issued by the Indian entity across all overseas investments, cannot exceed 400% of the Indian entity’s net worth as per the last audited balance sheet, not older than 18 months (OI Rules 2022, Rule 10). For early-stage startups with low paid-up capital and accumulated losses, this cap can be binding quickly.

Guarantees issued by the Indian entity to support its overseas subsidiary’s borrowings count toward the same 400% cap. Investments beyond this limit require prior RBI approval under the approval route, involving project reports and financial justifications submitted to the RBI via the AD bank.

What counts toward the 400% cap

ComponentCounts toward the cap
Equity investment in overseas entityYes
Compulsorily convertible instrumentsYes
Loans to overseas subsidiary or JVYes
Guarantees issued by Indian entityYes
Overseas Portfolio Investment (OPI, up to 10%)Separate framework
Reinvested earnings of the overseas subsidiaryNo
Dividends received from overseas entityNo

Form FC and the filing sequence

Every financial commitment to a foreign entity must be reported to the RBI via the Authorised Dealer (AD) Category I bank before the remittance of funds. The form is Form FC (which replaced the older Form ODI under the 2022 framework).

The sequence:

  1. Board resolution of the Indian entity authorising the investment, specifying amount, foreign entity details, and nature of commitment (equity or loan).
  2. Valuation certificate from a Category I Merchant Banker or registered valuer for the foreign entity’s shares.
  3. Statutory auditor certificate confirming the financial commitment is within the 400% net worth limit.
  4. KYC documents of the Indian entity: Certificate of Incorporation, PAN, audited financials not older than 18 months.
  5. Undertaking confirming FEMA compliance and PMLA compliance.
  6. Filing of Form FC with the AD bank. The bank generates a Unique Identification Number (UIN) for the overseas investment, which must be quoted in all subsequent reporting.

Funds are remitted only after the AD bank processes the Form FC and allows the transaction.

Annual Performance Report: the December 31 deadline

Once an overseas investment exists, the Indian entity must file an Annual Performance Report (APR) with the RBI by 31 December every year for each foreign entity. This is a calendar-year deadline, not a financial-year deadline. It is the most commonly missed compliance obligation in the entire ODI framework.

The APR must include financial statements of the overseas entity for the relevant year. Audited financials are preferred. If unavailable by December 31, unaudited financials may be used with a disclosure, but if audited figures differ significantly when available, a revised APR must be filed.

Failure to file the APR attracts a Late Submission Fee (LSF) starting at ₹7,500 plus 0.025% of the transaction amount per year of delay. The LSF facility is available only for delays up to 3 years. Delays beyond 3 years require FEMA compounding proceedings before the RBI Enforcement Directorate, with negotiated penalties and reputational scrutiny.

A May 2025 RBI directive stated explicitly that entities with historic ODI reporting lapses must regularise before initiating any new overseas investments, or face restrictions on all future outbound transactions.

Two-layer restriction and round-tripping risk

The OI Rules 2022 prohibit creating more than two layers of overseas subsidiaries without RBI approval. A Delaware C Corp (layer 1) can have one operating subsidiary such as a Singapore entity or a Delaware LLC (layer 2), but adding a third-tier entity requires prior approval.

The RBI scrutinises structures that look like round-tripping: Indian money going out as ODI and returning to India as FDI. A Delaware parent that then invests into the same Indian operating entity creates a circular loop that will face RBI questions and potentially GAAR challenges under the Income Tax Act.

The FLA Return: the second RBI filing that founders routinely overlook

The Annual Performance Report and the Foreign Liabilities and Assets (FLA) Return are two separate RBI filings. The APR gets the most attention in compliance discussions. The FLA Return is equally mandatory under FEMA 1999, notified via AP (DIR Series) Circular No. 45 dated 15 March 2011, yet it is consistently missed in practice.

What it is: The FLA Return is an annual statistical return filed with the RBI by all Indian entities that have outstanding FDI received from abroad or outstanding ODI made abroad, as on 31 March of the reporting year. It captures the stock of foreign liabilities (inward FDI) and foreign assets (outward ODI) on the Indian entity’s balance sheet.

Who must file: Any Indian company, LLP, SEBI-registered AIF, partnership firm, or PPP that has FDI or ODI outstanding on 31 March, even if there were no new transactions during the year. If you set up a Delaware entity three years ago and made no new investments since, you still must file the FLA Return every year until the ODI is fully exited and no longer appears on your balance sheet.

Deadline: 15 July each year, reporting the position as on 31 March. If audited accounts are not ready by 15 July, the return must be filed on unaudited (provisional) figures by 15 July and revised with audited figures by 30 September. Non-filing because your audit is pending is a FEMA violation.

Where to file: The FLAIR (Foreign Liabilities and Assets Information Reporting) portal at flair.rbi.org.in. Email submissions and offline Excel sheet submissions are no longer accepted. First-time filers must register on FLAIR using the entity’s CIN and PAN, and upload a signed Authority Letter and Verification Letter in RBI’s prescribed format, along with a Class 3 DSC.

Penalty for non-filing: Up to 300% of the contravention amount under FEMA Section 13. If unquantifiable, a flat ₹2,00,000 penalty plus ₹5,000 per day for continuing default. The RBI also levies an LSF of ₹7,500 for late submission.

How the FLA differs from the APR:

FLA ReturnAnnual Performance Report (APR)
Filed withRBI (FLAIR portal directly)RBI via AD bank
Triggered byOutstanding FDI or ODI on balance sheetHaving made ODI (each overseas entity)
Deadline15 July (position as on 31 March)31 December (calendar year)
CoversAll FDI received and all ODI made (stock)Performance of specific overseas JV/WOS
Mandatory even if dormantYesYes
Penalty regimeUp to 3x amount + ₹5,000/dayLSF ₹7,500 + 0.025% per year of delay

A startup that received FDI from a US angel investor into its Indian entity, and also made ODI into a Delaware entity, must file both: the FLA Return (covering both the FDI and the ODI position) by 15 July, and the APR for the Delaware entity by 31 December. These are not the same filing.

Our FEMA and RBI compliance team manages Form FC, APR, and FLA Return filings under a single annual compliance programme. If you are mid-year and unsure whether your filings are current, reach out to our FEMA advisory team.

FC-GPR: when your Delaware entity invests back into India

This direction of capital flow is where a separate and distinct compliance obligation arises. In a standard flip structure, the Delaware C Corp raises funds from US VCs and then deploys that capital into India, either as equity into the Indian subsidiary, or as an intercompany loan.

When the Delaware entity invests equity into the Indian subsidiary, the Indian subsidiary must file Form FC-GPR (Foreign Currency-Gross Provisional Return) with the RBI through its AD bank within 30 days of receiving the funds and within 60 days of allotting shares to the Delaware entity. Late FC-GPR filing attracts compounding penalties of up to 300% of the transaction amount under FEMA.

The FC-GPR filing requires a valuation certificate from a SEBI-registered Category I Merchant Banker confirming that the issue price of the Indian shares is not lower than the fair market value determined using internationally accepted pricing methodologies (typically the DCF method for unlisted companies). This valuation requirement applies every time the Delaware entity subscribes to new shares in the Indian subsidiary, including at each funding round.

The Indian subsidiary receiving FDI from the Delaware parent must also report this investment in its FLA Return. Both the inbound FDI into the Indian entity and the outbound ODI from the Indian founders into the Delaware entity appear in the same FLA Return, each in different sections.

Transfer pricing: the obligation most founders discover too late

Why it applies from year one

Once you have a Delaware parent and an Indian subsidiary, every transaction between the two (management fees, software development service fees, IP licensing fees, intercompany loans, reimbursements) is an “international transaction” between “associated enterprises” under Chapter X of the Income Tax Act. Under the Income-tax Act 2025 (effective from 01/04/2026), Section 161(1) reproduces the arm’s-length principle: all such transactions must be priced as if they were between unrelated parties.

The Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO) at the Indian Income Tax Department actively reviews intercompany pricing for Indian subsidiaries of foreign-parented entities. Adjustments can result in additional taxable income attributed to the Indian entity, interest on the adjustment amount, and penalty of 2% of the transaction value for failure to maintain TP documentation, with a further penalty of 50% of additional tax where income is under-reported.

What you must prepare every year

The Indian entity must:

  1. Prepare a contemporaneous TP study (the “local file”) documenting functions performed, assets employed, and risks assumed by each party (the FAR analysis), identifying comparable uncontrolled transactions, and benchmarking the intercompany price.
  2. File Form 48 (formerly Form 3CEB, renamed under the Income-tax Act 2025, the CA certificate in respect of international transactions) with the income tax return by 30 November for companies subject to TP audit requirements.
  3. Disclose TP details under Clause 14AA of the tax audit report (Form 3CD).

CBDT Notification No. 157/2025 (dated 06/11/2025) prescribes tolerance bands of 1% for wholesale trading and 3% for all other transactions for AY 2025-26. No corresponding notification had been issued for AY 2026-27 as of the date of this article. Taxpayers should not assume automatic carryforward.

The Income-tax Act 2025 repeat-transaction mechanism

The Finance Act 2025 introduced a “repeat-transaction” mechanism, reflected in the Income-tax Act 2025 (Section 167 equivalent). From AY 2026-27 onwards, a taxpayer may opt to apply the arm’s-length price determined for a particular year to similar transactions in the two immediately following years, subject to TPO validation within one month. This reduces documentation burden for stable recurring intercompany arrangements such as fixed-fee software development contracts. It is particularly valuable for captive development arrangements where the pricing model does not change year on year.

Common intercompany arrangements and how to price them

The most frequent arrangement between a Delaware parent and an Indian subsidiary is a captive service model: the Indian entity provides software development, product management, or business process services to the US parent on a cost-plus basis. Benchmark gross margins for cost-plus captive arrangements in India typically range from 17 to 25% over total costs, depending on functions performed and sector. Margins outside this range attract TPO scrutiny.

If the Delaware entity licenses IP to the Indian subsidiary, the royalty rate must also be benchmarked and supported by a separate functional analysis. Royalties at non-arm’s-length rates are a primary target for Indian TP adjustments.

Safe harbour under the Income-tax Act 2025

Section 167 introduces safe harbour provisions. The CBDT may notify specific pricing guidelines that, if followed, are deemed arm’s-length. CBDT Notification No. 21/2025 (dated 25/03/2025) expanded safe harbour thresholds: the transaction value threshold for eligibility increased from ₹200 crore to ₹300 crore for AY 2025-26 and AY 2026-27. For startups with smaller intercompany transaction volumes, safe harbour routes provide certainty without a full benchmarking exercise, but they require acceptance of fixed margins that may exceed actual profitability, so the commercial trade-off must be assessed.

US tax obligations for the Indian-owned Delaware C Corp

Delaware franchise tax: avoid the default calculation trap

Every Delaware corporation owes an annual franchise tax to the State of Delaware, due by 1 March. There are two calculation methods:

The Authorised Shares Method is Delaware’s default. For a startup that authorised 10 million shares, this method produces a franchise tax bill of USD 85,000 or more because the formula applies a flat rate per 10,000 shares. Most startup incorporations result in an automatic over-billing under this method.

The Assumed Par Value Capital Method produces a far lower bill for most startups. Under this method, the tax is calculated based on the company’s total assets divided by issued shares, multiplied by authorised shares, multiplied by USD 400 per USD 1 million of assumed par value capital. For a startup with USD 500,000 in total assets, this typically produces a franchise tax of USD 400 to USD 500, the minimum.

Founders must actively elect the Assumed Par Value method or instruct their US CPA to calculate using that method. Delaware does not apply it automatically. Every startup running a Delaware C Corp should verify which method is being used. Most early-stage entities should pay the minimum franchise tax, not the default five-figure bill that the Authorised Shares Method generates.

MethodDefault?Typical bill for early-stage startupElection required
Authorised Shares MethodYesUSD 85,000+ (for 10M shares)No (this is default)
Assumed Par Value MethodNoUSD 400-500Yes (must elect or request)

Late franchise tax filing incurs a USD 200 penalty plus 1.5% monthly interest on the unpaid amount.

Form 5472 and Form 1120

A Delaware C Corp must file IRS Form 1120 (US Corporation Income Tax Return) annually, due 15 April for calendar-year entities. Because most Indian-owned Delaware C Corps have Indian founders or an Indian entity owning at least 25% of shares, they must also file Form 5472 attached to Form 1120. Form 5472 reports all “reportable transactions” between the US corporation and its foreign related parties (IRS Sections 6038A and 6038C). Reportable transactions include:

  • Equity infusion from Indian founders or Indian entity.
  • Intercompany service fees, licensing fees, or management charges.
  • Loans between the US and Indian entities.
  • Any transfer of money or property to/from a foreign related party.

A separate Form 5472 must be filed for each foreign related party. Three Indian founders each owning the Delaware entity directly means three separate Form 5472 filings. The penalty for failure to file a complete and accurate Form 5472 is USD 25,000 per form, per year, with no statutory cap. There is no statute of limitations on the underlying tax return year if Form 5472 was not filed, meaning the IRS can audit that year indefinitely.

Form 5472 cannot be e-filed for foreign-owned disregarded entities (Delaware LLCs). For C Corps, it is filed as part of the standard Form 1120 package.

Delaware registered agent

Every Delaware entity must maintain a registered agent with a physical Delaware address. Registered agent services range from USD 60 per year (some providers bundle this into monthly plans) to USD 300 per year at traditional providers. Failure to maintain a registered agent causes the company to lose “good standing” status, blocking fundraising and banking.

Full cost picture: US side and India side

Cost itemOne-time or annualEstimated amount
Delaware Certificate of IncorporationOne-timeUSD 89 to USD 1,089 (state fee, speed-dependent)
Incorporation service feeOne-timeUSD 297 to USD 999
EIN applicationOne-timeFree (IRS)
Registered agentAnnualUSD 60 to USD 300
Delaware franchise taxAnnualUSD 400 minimum (Assumed Par Value method)
Form 1120 (US CPA fee)AnnualUSD 1,500 to USD 3,000
Form 5472 per related partyAnnualUSD 100 to USD 500 per form (CPA fee)
Form FC / AD bank charges (India)Per transaction₹2,000 to ₹5,000 per transaction
APR filing (India)Annual₹75,000 to ₹3,50,000 (includes overseas audit cost)
FLA Return filing (India)Annual₹10,000 to ₹30,000 (CA fee)
TP study and Form 48 (India)Annual₹1,50,000 to ₹5,00,000
FC-GPR valuation and filing (per round)Per transaction₹75,000 to ₹2,00,000

POEM risk: when your Delaware entity may be treated as an Indian tax resident

This risk is often not assessed at the time of entity formation and tends to surface only during a tax audit.

Under Section 6(3) of the Income Tax Act (maintained in the Income-tax Act 2025), a foreign company is deemed to be an Indian tax resident if its Place of Effective Management (POEM) is in India in that year. POEM is defined as the place where key management and commercial decisions necessary for the conduct of the entity’s business as a whole are, in substance, made.

For an Indian-founded Delaware C Corp whose founders are all based in India, who conduct all board meetings from India (even via Zoom), who make all product, investment, and commercial decisions from India, and whose registered Delaware office is occupied only by a registered agent. The POEM analysis points squarely to India. If the Income Tax Department concludes the Delaware entity’s POEM is in India, it becomes an Indian tax resident and must pay Indian corporate tax at 25% (for companies with turnover up to ₹400 crore) on its worldwide income.

The CBDT issued POEM guidelines in 2017 under Circular No. 6/2017. Key factors that indicate India POEM:

  • Board meetings predominantly held in India.
  • Key executives (CEO, CTO, CPO) resident in India and making decisions for the Delaware entity.
  • Core banking decisions, contract approvals, and business strategy determined from India.
  • Delaware entity has no employees of its own; all human capital sits in the Indian subsidiary.

To mitigate POEM risk, at least some board meetings of the Delaware entity should be held outside India (even in Singapore or the UAE), key corporate decisions should be documented as having been made in Delaware or another foreign jurisdiction, and the Delaware entity should ideally have at least one director who is not an India-resident. These are not cosmetic steps. They require genuine substance and documentation.

India-US DTAA: how it interacts with intercompany flows

India and the US have a Double Tax Avoidance Agreement (DTAA) in force. Key provisions for intercompany flows:

Dividends: The DTAA reduces US withholding tax on dividends paid by the Delaware entity to Indian resident shareholders from the default 30% to 15% (if the recipient holds at least 10% of voting shares) or 25% otherwise. The Indian resident claims credit for the US withholding tax under Section 90 of the Income Tax Act.

Royalties and technical service fees: Payments from the Indian subsidiary to the Delaware parent for IP licensing or technical services are taxed at 15% withholding under the DTAA.

Interest on intercompany loans: Interest is typically taxed at 15% under the DTAA.

MAP: Where the Indian TP authority and the IRS reach different arm’s-length conclusions on the same transaction, the Mutual Agreement Procedure under the DTAA provides a binding resolution mechanism. India has concluded bilateral APAs with the US under this treaty. For founders with large, stable intercompany arrangements, entering an APA provides certainty for five prospective years with a four-year rollback option.

PE risk from the DTAA perspective: Founders working from India for the Delaware entity may inadvertently create a permanent establishment of the Delaware entity in India under Article 5 of the DTAA, subjecting it to Indian corporate tax on attributed profits. This overlaps with but is distinct from the POEM analysis: POEM makes the entire Delaware entity an Indian resident, while a PE creates a deemed India-business of an otherwise non-resident entity.

ESOPs in a flip structure: what Indian employees need to know

If the Delaware C Corp issues stock options to employees of the Indian subsidiary (a forward flip ESOP), the compliance spans three regimes.

FEMA classification at exercise: When an Indian employee exercises options and acquires Delaware shares, the acquisition is classified under the FEMA OI Framework. If the shares acquired represent less than 10% of the Delaware entity’s paid-up equity capital individually, the acquisition is OPI under Rule 7 of the OI Rules 2022. Above 10%, it is ODI under Rule 9. For most employee grants, OPI classification applies. The employee must track OPI limits and file with their AD bank annually.

LRS limit at exercise: The exercise price remittance by the Indian employee to the Delaware entity is treated as an outward remittance under the Liberalised Remittance Scheme (LRS). The LRS limit is USD 250,000 per financial year per individual, covering all purposes including travel and education. For high-value grants or accumulated multi-year options, this limit can become binding. The Indian subsidiary acts as TDS deductor under Section 192(1) on the perquisite at exercise.

Perquisite taxation: The difference between the fair market value (FMV) of the Delaware shares on the exercise date and the exercise price paid is a perquisite taxable as salary income in India. FMV for the US parent must be determined by a 409A valuation (annual, or on material events). The 409A valuation is converted to INR at the RBI reference rate on the exercise date.

83(b) election for Indian employees receiving restricted stock: If the Delaware entity grants restricted stock (not options) to an Indian employee, the 83(b) election in the US is the employee’s choice, not just the founder’s. The India-side tax treatment follows separately. Restricted stock grants to Indian tax residents are governed by Section 17(2) of the Income Tax Act, with perquisite value determined at vesting unless the ESOP is an SEBI-compliant scheme.

Common mistakes that cost founders time and money

Remitting funds to Delaware before filing Form FC. Many founders wire money from their Indian company to the newly formed Delaware entity through their regular bank as an “advance for services” or “intercompany transfer” without routing it through an AD bank and without filing Form FC. This is a FEMA violation. Penalties can reach 300% of the transaction amount. Even small amounts must be regularised through the LSF mechanism before any new overseas investment can be made.

Assuming APR and FLA Return are the same filing. They are not. The APR is filed via the AD bank by 31 December and covers the performance of each overseas entity. The FLA Return is filed directly on the FLAIR portal by 15 July and covers the stock of all FDI and ODI outstanding on the Indian entity’s balance sheet. Missing either is a FEMA violation. Missing both in the same year compounds the exposure.

Not filing Form 5472 because the Delaware entity had no revenue. Form 5472 is triggered by reportable transactions, not revenue. Any capital contribution from an Indian founder or entity to the Delaware entity in the year is a reportable transaction. Most early-stage Delaware C Corps receive capital from Indian founders in year one and must file Form 5472 as part of Form 1120. The USD 25,000 penalty applies regardless of entity size or revenue.

Using the Authorised Shares Method for franchise tax by default. The Delaware Secretary of State’s system defaults to the Authorised Shares Method when calculating franchise tax. For a startup with 10 million authorised shares, this produces a bill of USD 85,000 or more. The Assumed Par Value Method typically produces a USD 400 minimum franchise tax for early-stage entities. Most founders who do not have a US CPA reviewing their annual report discover this error only after being billed.

Ignoring TP documentation in year one. The obligation to maintain contemporaneous documentation and file Form 48 applies from the first year any international transaction occurs between the Indian entity and the Delaware entity, including the first software development service agreement or management fee arrangement. There is no revenue threshold. The statute of limitations does not protect against penalties for missing TP documentation in year one.

Missing the FC-GPR on FDI received by the Indian subsidiary. When the Delaware entity (post-fundraising) invests capital into the Indian operating subsidiary, the Indian entity must file Form FC-GPR within 30 days of receiving the funds and 60 days of allotting shares. Many founders focus entirely on the outbound ODI compliance and overlook the inbound FC-GPR obligation when capital flows back into India. Late FC-GPR filing attracts compounding penalties of up to 300% of the transaction amount.

Treelife practitioner note

In the Delaware C Corp engagements we have run at Treelife, the most consistent pattern is a timing disconnect. Founders complete the Delaware incorporation in two to four weeks using a self-service tool and then spend three to six months fixing the India-side structure retroactively.

The most serious version of this we handled was a Bengaluru-based SaaS founder who had wired USD 50,000 from the Indian company to the Delaware entity as “advance for services”, not classified as ODI, no Form FC filed, no AD bank involved. By the time we were engaged, the Delaware entity had entered into a services agreement with the Indian subsidiary with no TP documentation, had issued ESOPs to the Indian team, and had received a small FDI inflow from the US VC into the Indian subsidiary for which no FC-GPR had been filed. Three separate FEMA violations across two entities, a TP documentation gap, and a US Form 5472 that had not been filed. The FLA Return had also not been filed for the two years the structure had been in existence. The regularisation process took four months, involved LSF payments across multiple violations, a revised intercompany services agreement with a fresh benchmarking study, two years of delinquent Form 5472s filed by a US CPA, and FC-GPR late filings compounded by the RBI.

The FEMA provisions engaged were Rule 9 of the OI Rules 2022, Regulation 4 of the Overseas Investment Directions 2022, and Section 6 of FEMA 1999 for the unauthorised outward remittance. The TP obligation rested in Section 92C of the Income Tax Act (Section 161 under the Income-tax Act 2025). None of these are obscure provisions. The structural problem is that US-side incorporation advice and India-side FEMA and TP compliance are almost never handled by the same team, leaving the cross-border layer unowned.

At Treelife, we handle both sides under one engagement. The Form FC, APR, FLA Return, TP study, Form 48, FC-GPR, and US-India DTAA structuring are coordinated, not sequential.

Frequently asked questions on Setting up Delaware Entity

Q: Can a sole proprietor or unregistered Indian entity make an ODI into a Delaware C Corp?
A: A sole proprietorship or unregistered partnership can make ODI only if it holds “Status Holder” classification under the Foreign Trade Policy. For most startups, ODI must originate from a registered Indian entity (private limited company, LLP) or from the Indian founders in their individual capacity under the LRS up to USD 250,000 per year per individual.

Q: What is the LRS limit for an individual Indian founder investing personally into a Delaware C Corp?
A: USD 250,000 per financial year (April to March). All LRS remittances in that year across all purposes (travel, education, investment, maintenance of close relatives abroad) count toward this combined limit. Amounts above USD 250,000 per founder per year must use the corporate ODI route through the Indian entity.

Q: How is the Delaware C Corp taxed in the US?
A: At the US federal corporate tax rate of 21% on net US-sourced income (IRC Section 11). Delaware state does not levy a state income tax on corporations that do not conduct business inside Delaware, which applies to most Indian-founded Delaware holding entities with all operations in India.

Q: What is the timeline from decision to a fully operational Delaware entity with Indian ODI in place?
A: Typically 6 to 10 weeks. Delaware incorporation: 1 to 7 business days. EIN for foreign applicants: 4 to 6 weeks. Form FC with the AD bank: 5 to 10 business days once documents are ready. Bank account at a US fintech bank: 1 to 4 weeks. Running these steps in parallel, allow 10 weeks total.

Q: Can the Delaware C Corp hire employees directly in India?
A: No. A foreign company cannot hire employees directly in India without a legal entity or a Professional Employer Organisation (PEO) arrangement. The Indian subsidiary handles employment, payroll, and statutory compliance (PF, ESI, TDS) for India-based employees. The Delaware entity contracts with the Indian subsidiary for services.

Q: Do I need to file the FLA Return if my Indian company only made ODI (no FDI received)?
A: Yes. The FLA Return covers both foreign liabilities (FDI received) and foreign assets (ODI made). If your Indian company has outstanding ODI on its balance sheet as on 31 March, whether or not any FDI has been received, the FLA Return is mandatory.

Q: Does setting up a Delaware entity create a permanent establishment risk in India?
A: Yes, potentially. If Indian-resident founders or employees exercise decision-making authority, habitually conclude agreements, or perform the core commercial functions of the Delaware entity from India, the Delaware entity may have a PE in India under Article 5 of the India-US DTAA. PE determination is fact-specific and requires structuring advice before the entity begins operations.

Q: Can the Indian entity provide a guarantee for borrowings by the Delaware entity?
A: Yes, under the OI Rules 2022, but the guarantee counts toward the 400% net worth cap. For startups with low net worth, guarantees can exhaust headroom needed for direct equity investment.

Q: Do ESOPs issued by the Delaware entity to Indian employees require RBI approval?
A: No, prior RBI approval is not required. But the acquisition of the Delaware parent’s shares at exercise is governed by the FEMA OI Rules 2022 (classified as OPI if below 10% threshold individually). The Indian subsidiary must deduct TDS on the perquisite at exercise and maintain LRS tracking for each employee.

Q: What happens to the ODI compliance if the Delaware entity is dissolved?
A: Dissolution proceeds must be repatriated to India within 60 days of receipt and reported to the RBI through the AD bank. Failure to repatriate disinvestment proceeds is a FEMA violation. The Indian entity must file a disinvestment report confirming no dues are outstanding to the overseas entity. The FLA Return obligation ceases only once the ODI no longer appears as a foreign asset on the Indian balance sheet.

Q: What changed about the FinCEN BOI filing requirement in 2025?
A: On 26 March 2025, FinCEN issued an interim final rule exempting all entities created under the laws of a US state, including Delaware C Corps, from the Corporate Transparency Act beneficial ownership reporting requirement. Your domestic Delaware C Corp has no BOI filing obligation with FinCEN regardless of who owns it. The requirement now applies only to foreign entities (Cayman, BVI, Mauritius, etc.) that have registered as foreign entities to do business in a US state.

Q: When should an Indian startup consider a reverse flip?
A: A reverse flip (bringing the holding company back to India) is worth considering when US VC participation is no longer the dominant constraint, Indian capital markets or strategic acquirers become the exit path, or the business has enough Indian revenue to justify an Indian holding structure. The reverse flip involves a scheme of arrangement under Sections 230-234 of the Companies Act 2013, NCLT approval, and Section 47 income tax exemption subject to conditions including a no-transfer lock-in period. It is a 12 to 18-month process and should be planned well in advance of any liquidity event.

Q: How does the Income-tax Act 2025 change transfer pricing obligations?
A: The Income-tax Act 2025, effective from 01/04/2026, reproduces the arm’s-length principle in Section 161(1). The key change of direct practical benefit is that Section 167 expressly clarifies that the tolerance band (3% for most transactions, 1% for wholesale trading) applies even where only a single comparable exists, resolving a long-standing controversy under the older Section 92C. The repeat-transaction mechanism from AY 2026-27 onwards reduces annual documentation burden for stable intercompany arrangements. Core obligations (Form 48, formerly Form 3CEB, filing, contemporaneous documentation, APA/MAP access) remain unchanged.

Q: Is a Delaware entity the right first step or should we incorporate in India first?
A: It depends on where your seed capital is coming from. If your first funding is from an Indian angel or Indian family and friends, incorporating in India first and doing the ODI flip later is simpler and avoids premature FEMA obligations. If your first funding is from a US angel or you are applying to YC or a US accelerator, form the Delaware entity from day one. The structure should follow the money, not the other way around.

Regulatory references:

  • Foreign Exchange Management Act (FEMA), 1999: Sections 6, 9, 11, 13, 13(IA), 37A
  • Foreign Exchange Management (Overseas Investment) Rules, 2022: Rules 7, 9, 10, notified 22/08/2022
  • Foreign Exchange Management (Overseas Investment) Regulations, 2022: RBI circular 22/08/2022
  • Foreign Exchange Management (Overseas Investment) Directions, 2022: AD bank instructions
  • Foreign Exchange Management (Borrowing and Lending) (First Amendment) Regulations, 2026: RBI notification, March 2026
  • AP (DIR Series) Circular No. 45 dated 15/03/2011: FLA Return notification
  • Form FC-GPR: FDI reporting under FEMA (Reporting) Regulations 2000
  • Income Tax Act, 1961: Sections 6(3), 90, 92, 92C, 92CA, 92CC, 112A
  • Income-tax Act, 2025: Sections 161(1), 167, effective 01/04/2026
  • CBDT Notification No. 157/2025 dated 06/11/2025: TP tolerance ranges AY 2025-26
  • CBDT Notification No. 21/2025 dated 25/03/2025: Safe harbour threshold expansion
  • CBDT Circular No. 6/2017: POEM guidelines
  • Finance Act 2025: Amendment to Section 92CA (repeat-transaction mechanism)
  • Internal Revenue Code (IRC): Sections 11, 6038A, 6038C
  • Delaware General Corporation Law (DGCL)
  • IRS Form 5472 Instructions (December 2024)
  • FinCEN Interim Final Rule, 26/03/2025: BOI exemption for domestic reporting companies

External sources:

For Customer Support

Mumbai | Delhi |
Bangalore

Speak to Us!

We respond within 60 minutes.

    Your information is confidential and secure


    Let's talk.

    We've seen most founder problems before. Tell us yours.

    Error: Contact form not found.

    Typically responds within 4 hours
    Or reach out directly